advertisement

Residents ring in first year of smoking ban

Wednesday, January 9, 2008 | 9:16 p.m. CST; updated 5:05 a.m. CDT, Monday, July 21, 2008

Columbia — Mona Ajans’ heavy-smoking father died of heart failure in his 60s. One of her brothers in Germany died of a massive heart attack two years ago after smoking most of his life.

Her brother refused to visit her in Columbia because of the 9-hour flight in which smoking wasn’t allowed.

And 20 years ago, her husband stepped in and shredded a carton of cigarettes she had hidden in order to keep her from starting down the same path.

“You lose your freedom when you are addicted,” Ajans said.

It’s easy to see why Ajans came out to celebrate the one-year anniversary of Columbia’s smoking ban on Wednesday, which was hosted at The Blue Note by the Campus-Community Alliance for Smoke-Free Environments and the Smoke-Free Air for Everyone.

The celebration was meant to act as a show of thanks to the City Council for passing the ban and gather people together to show their support, said Dean Anderson, the project coordinator for the alliance.

Linda Green said she is relieved to not have to worry about the health of her son, who is a musician working at bars and restaurants. Another attendee, Michael Wilson, said he quit smoking 27 years ago and feels he can enjoy his food better at restaurants with the smoking ban in place.

However, there are some people who aren’t in such a celebratory mood.

Boone Liberty Coalition chairman Greg Rennier issued a statement Wednesday that the group feels it is inappropriate to mark the anniversary of the smoking ban.

“What they are celebrating are the property rights taken by the government,” said John Schultz, a liberty coalition member.

He said the ban has caused some restaurant and bar closings, job losses and decreased sales tax revenues in the city. He said the smoking ban is a “one-size-fits-all policy” and that a majority of restaurants and bars were already smoke-free.

Kevin Everett, an alliance member and MU professor, disagreed.

Everett said he found through his own research that smoking bans in other cities have reduced 80 percent of contaminants in the air from second-hand smoke.

“The right to breathe clean air is a fundamental right of all,” Everett said. “It is premature to evaluate that (economic impact) in Columbia. Studies I read encourage us to wait at least a year to see what the economic impact has been.”


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Tom Head January 10, 2008 | 1:13 p.m.

?

(Report Comment)
John Schultz January 10, 2008 | 4:44 p.m.

It probably should have been reported that Kevin Everett is not just an "alliance member" but is listed as the "principal investigator" on the CASE website:

http://www.casemo.org/people/everett.sht...

He is also leading the Mobilizing Tomorrow's Leaders for a Smoke-Free Missouri effort that was funded by a (multi-million dollar, if I remember correctly) grant from the Missouri Foundation for Health.

http://www.fcm.missouri.edu/research-cur...

I don't understand the context of the 80% quote. I would think with a smoking ban that 100% of the secondhand smoke contaminants would be gone.

And if it's a right to breathe clean air, why didn't the city outlaw the sale, possession, and use of tobacco in the city limits? Shouldn't the city council have done so if secondhand smoke is as bad as claimed by those pushing the ban? People can still smoke on sidewalks, parking lots, 50% of outdoor patios, parks, bike trails, and many other places. Will we see SAFE and CASE come back emboldened in a couple years and try to push smoking bans in private cars and homes?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements