advertisement

Bill gets amendment to ban chemical abortions

Tuesday, March 4, 2008 | 7:01 p.m. CST; updated 11:15 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, July 22, 2008

JEFFERSON CITY — A House bill originally designed to enable the Health Department to monitor the sales of prescriptions is being bogged down with several amendments, one of which would ban the chemical abortion.

The amendment, approved by the House Tuesday 113-36, would classify mifepristone, used to induce an abortion, as an illegal drug.

“I’m a pro-life Democrat and a firm believer in maintaining the life of a fetus,” said the amendment’s sponsor, Rep. Ray Salva, D-Jackson County. Salva said that mifepristone causes the fetus to separate from the uterus, which is different from the “morning after pill,” which aborts an egg.

“The difference between it and the morning after pill is that the morning after pill aborts the egg before it travels and attaches itself the uterus, which of course women experience during their menstrual cycle every month,” Salva said.

The amendment was attached to a bill to require electronic monitoring of prescription drugs. The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Kenneth Jones, R-California, said he wasn’t thrilled about the addition of the abortion issue into his bill but said that he doesn’t think it will affect the passage of his bill.

“He put it under a Class I drug, and Class I drugs have a lot of addictive qualities, but no medical qualities,” Jones said. “It just doesn’t fit there. Whether you put it there or not, it doesn’t fit with the federal standards for a Schedule I drug.”

Planned Parenthood Affiliates in Missouri said they think the amendment has nothing to do with the original intent of the bill and said mifepristone does not fit as a Schedule I drug.

“You can’t get it from a pharmacy. It’s not a prescription. You can only get it from an abortion provider,” said Michelle Trupiano, the organization’s spokeswoman.

Questions also were raised about the prescription-drug database that would be created and maintained by the state under the bill.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri has said it has reservations about the bill and the privacy issues it brings up. Spokesman John Coffman said the ACLU opposes the legislation unless improvements can be made regarding the privacy aspects.

Before adjourning for the day Tuesday, the House adopted an amendment that would make it a class D felony to violate confidentiality provisions involving the database. A class D felony could result in a maximum of four years in prison.

The House did not take a final vote on the bill.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements