MU administrator opposes alternative teacher certification bill

Monday, March 31, 2008 | 7:48 p.m. CDT; updated 10:46 p.m. CDT, Monday, July 21, 2008

JEFFERSON CITY — An associate dean of the College of Education at MU opposes a Senate bill allowing an out-of-state organization to certify elementary and high school teachers.

Deborah Carr, associate dean for academic programs, testified before a special House Student Achievement Committee on a Senate-passed measure that would allow persons without education degrees to teach full time in public schools if certified by a national organization.

Despite Carr’s protest, the bill was passed 6-1 by the committee and has been referred to the Rules Committee.

Carr said the organization, the American Board of Certification for Teacher Excellence, requires too few hours of classroom experience prior to certification.

“This is certainly not enough preparatory time,” Carr said.

She said she would only support the program outlined in the bill if it targeted high-need subject areas such as math and science.

Rep. Timothy Flook, R-Liberty, who serves on the committee, said he also supports “narrowing the bill to math and science.”

In addition to Carr, two professors from William Jewell College near Kansas City testified in opposition to the bill. Donna Gardner, who also represented the Missouri Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, and Cynthia Green said ABCTE lowers certification standards.

“What we do is effective,” Gardner said. “Missouri has already adopted alternative teacher certification.”

She said there are more than 35 programs for “successful alternative certification” in the state, including one at William Jewell.

Sen. Luann Ridgeway, R-Smithville, who sponsored the bill, said the state’s existing programs force career-changers to quit their jobs to either attend classes or start teaching without any preparation.

But Gardner said professionals looking for careers in education can find programs where classes take place at night.

Rep. Ed Robb, R-Columbia, said he understands the opposition from an economic standpoint.

“If I were from a college of education, I’d be afraid this program would dilute my business,” he said, suggesting that these colleges “do something similar to ABCTE.”

But those who testified at the hearing said they think ABCTE produces unprepared teachers.

“Do you want to drive a car that doesn’t have seat belts, doesn’t have brakes, doesn’t have the proper safety equipment?” Green said.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Kenneth Clifton April 1, 2008 | 11:24 p.m.

If testing for qualification is insufficient to establish competency, let's remove the requirement for Praxis and such. Note that ABCTE's test has been proven to be more difficult (a higher failure rate) than Praxis, as well.

Meanwhile, I expect that many could b.s. their way through Education courses without knowing a thing about how to teach.

Kenneth Clifton

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.