Senate gives quick initial OK to bill on illegal immigration

Tuesday, April 1, 2008 | 3:53 p.m. CDT; updated 8:48 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, July 22, 2008

JEFFERSON CITY — State senators gave quick preliminary approval today to legislation cracking down on illegal immigrants and those who hire them.

The bill would require police to check immigration status after arrests; block illegal immigrants from receiving public benefits such as aid for food, housing or retirement; and withhold state money from cities with policies to not cooperate with immigration authorities, among other things.

It's the first immigration bill to be brought to the Senate floor this session. Senators endorsed the bill after barely an hour of debate. When the first-round vote was taken by voice vote, just five senators — two Republicans and three Democrats — were on the floor.

Afterward, Senate Majority Leader Charlie Shields, R-St. Joseph, joked that the debate was so much shorter than anticipated that it messed up his floor debate schedule.

Sponsoring Sen. Scott Rupp also told reporters that the quick endorsement was surprising. The Senate has no time limit and discussions about controversial bills sometimes stretch for days.

"I didn't expect to get it through in an hour," said Rupp, R-Wentzville, who promoted his bill as "a levelheaded approach, not heavy-handed in any way."

Rupp's legislation still needs another vote to move to the House, which already has passed a bill that would bar illegal immigrants from attending public colleges and universities.

The Senate measure includes a less stringent version of that provision. In Rupp's bill, illegal immigrants born before Aug. 28, 2008, and who complete at least three semesters in a Missouri high school could still go to state colleges, as long as they don't receive resident tuition rates.

Rep. Jerry Nolte, chairman of the House immigration committee, said a person's lawful residency "needs to be a bright-line test" for determining college enrollment. But Nolte, R-Gladstone, said he needs to study the bill further before deciding whether to compromise on that point.

Joan Suarez, chairwoman of Missouri Immigrant and Refugee Advocates, said the bill is poorly drafted, tramples due process rights, turns every government employee into the immigration police and would be regretted.

"It's going to increase racial-profiling, it's going to increase tensions and it's going to make people feel very unwelcome and unsafe," she said.

Washington-based Pew Hispanic Center, using census data, estimates that 35,000 to 65,000 illegal immigrants live in Missouri. That's somewhere between the population of Cape Girardeau and St. Charles and just a fraction of the 12 million people the center estimates to be in the U.S. illegally.

Legislative leaders have made immigration legislation a priority for the session.

But the prospect of new restrictions on employers has prompted opposition from business groups. Of particular concern are bills to require every business to use the federal E-Verify program to check whether newly hired employees can work in the U.S.

Rupp's bill requires state and local governments, such as school districts, to use the database. Businesses that have a government contract worth more than $5,000 or that receive state loans or tax breaks also would be required to use it.

Private businesses wouldn't have to use E-Verify, but if they don't and are caught knowingly hiring an illegal immigrant, they could lose their business license. Under the bill, businesses found unknowingly employing an illegal immigrant would need to fire the worker and begin using the database.

Rupp said his version is an attempt to compromise — allowing private employers to decide whether to opt in but creating an incentive to do so.

Arizona already requires employers to use E-Verify, and several other states are considering legislation to do so. But E-Verify has strict rules for when employers can check the work eligibility status of new hires. The system can't be used to screen job applicants or check existing employees.

Another concern raised by critics is that misspelled names and last names entered as middle names have led to mistakes in determining whether a worker can be hired.

Gary Marble, the president of Associated Industries of Missouri, one of the business groups worried about mandated use of the federal database, said Rupp's legislation seems to be moving in the right direction.

"We have no problem with a state law that is more responsive, we just have a problem with a state law that is going to be more regulatory," Marble said.

Another provision would criminalize the transport or hiding of an illegal immigrant. Moving an illegal immigrant in Missouri or helping conceal someone who is not legally in the U.S. would be a felony carrying at least one year in prison and a fine of at least $1,000.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Dave F April 3, 2008 | 4:12 p.m.

Los Angeles’ sanctuary law, and all others like it, contradicts everything that has been learned about public safety.
The former LAPD Chief Daryl Gates enacted Special Order 40 in 1979 — in response to the city’s burgeoning population of illegal immigrants. It showed that even the most unapologetic law-and-order officer is no match for the immigration invasion. Order 40 as it was called prohibits officers from "initiating police action where the objective is to discover the alien status of a person. The Scourge of Sanctuary Cities has brought to communities, dangerous gangs, drug peddlers, human slavery and 12 to 20 million foreign nationals who taxpayers are supporting. American citizens should wonder how much it is costing their state in subsiding cheap labor, because of the pariah employer infestation.

Assemblywoman Mimi Walters, a Republican from Oceanside, said illegal immigrants cost California taxpayers an estimated $9 billion each year. How many in the California penal system are illegal aliens, and why have they not been deported to their own country for their own government to support them?

The illegal invasion can only be understood by the corrupting influence
on politicians of money for cheap labor for the Republicans or the
Welfare votes for the Democrats that makes them dishonor their Oath of
Office, the US Constitution against Invasion, and Enforcement of our
Immigration Laws! Powerful forces at work to stop relevant immigration
enforcement, that includes La Raza and friends, big businesses, the
church machine and other special interest lobby.

Specifically Democrats must demand from their Senators and Representatives to co-author THE FEDERAL SAVE ACT. If you believe in "Rule of Law" and not the rhetoric of lies from special interest groups. Then REGISTER YOUR OUTRAGE at ongoing efforts to keep our country from enforcing its immigration laws!

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.