advertisement

Letter: Midwives should be licensed in Missouri

Tuesday, April 22, 2008 | 10:00 a.m. CDT; updated 1:55 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, July 22, 2008

It is high time that certified professional midwives be licensed in Missouri. For the past 50 years, these highly skilled practitioners have been deemed felons. During the past 20 years, a small but mighty group has been at the capitol daily, fighting for change. Every spring begins with a bill to legalize midwives but ends with disappointment for home-birth families. Our state leaders keep deciding that women cannot make their own decisions and should not have freedom over their own births. This is a public health outrage, and it has gone on long enough.

It won’t be long before I am having babies myself, and I should be able to find a home-birth midwife in the Yellow Pages. Enough talk on safety already. The research is overwhelming; midwives and home births are safe — in fact, optimal! Read the certified professional midwives 2000 study in the British Medical Journal. Rent “The Business of Being Born.” Browse www.childbirthconnection.org. You’ll soon see this isn’t about safety. It’s about power.

The power should not reside within the capitol walls. The power should not rest with the Missouri State Medical Association. The power should belong to Missouri people. I am a Missourian, and I am saying “yes” to midwives. I’m saying “no” to collaborative practice and I’m saying “no” to the Board of Healing Arts as well. And I’m in good company. I wonder when my government, the public servants, will start listening.

There are four weeks left to license midwives this year, and it’s time. It was time half a century ago.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Mike Bellman April 23, 2008 | 12:07 p.m.

I think opinions will be swaywed if the proponents of Midwives, begin to pronounce it as it is spelled. "Mid-whiff-ery" sounds like a pompous and deliberate pronounciation. From my perspective is grows from the same root as the intentional spelling of "womyn" as an affront to not needing "man".

Hogwash. As far as I know, all births involve a "man" at one point or another. You can't escape your biology by substituting your vocabulary.

Now say it right: Mid-WIVES....

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements