advertisement

Columbia proposes closing Lake of the Woods Pool to save money

Saturday, August 2, 2008 | 5:11 p.m. CDT; updated 11:53 p.m. CDT, Saturday, August 2, 2008
People swim Friday afternoon at Lake of the Woods Pool. The public pool may be closed after the end of the season.

COLUMBIA - Swimmers and sunbathers at Lake of the Woods Pool said they're disappointed by a city proposal to close the pool next year to save money.

Matthew Pierce, 9, took the news with a furrowed brow, pausing midway through his Rocket Popsicle on Friday afternoon to ask if it were really true. He said he would be upset if the pool closes.

MoreStory


Related Media

"It's so small; she can keep an eye on us the whole time," he said, gesturing toward his mother, Rebecca Pierce. She agreed with her son.

"I'd hate to see it go. I really would," Pierce said. "It has been a great family experience."

City Manager Bill Watkins listed the closing of Lake of the Woods Pool next summer as one of several cuts in the "squeaky" budget for fiscal 2009. Closing the pool would save the city about $13,000, or 0.00005 percent of the total proposed operating budget of $256.6 million.

Pierce and her family began visiting the facility this summer when they bought a house down the road. She said that she and her husband were planning to buy a pool themselves until they found the aquatic center at Lake of the Woods.

"We're here every day, except when it rains," she said. Melanie Karrick has frequently used the pool on the city's east side for the past six or seven years. She thinks closing it would be a mistake.

"The pool has the feel of a smaller neighborhood pool. It's well-run, calm and family-oriented," she said. "And it's the only one on this side of town."

Karrick's daughter, Michaela, 7, said she would miss the slides and ice cream at Lake of the Woods and would want to swim at Stephens Lake if the pool closes. Her mother, however, said she preferred the pool's staff of lifeguards.

"There's definitely a sense of security here," she said.

Expenses such as lifeguards, concessions and maintenance contributed to the recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Department staff that the pool be closed, recreation services manager Gary Ristow said. The pool's revenue last summer covered only 38 percent of its costs. Ristow said that when the staff looks for possible cuts, it homes in on the most heavily subsidized programs. They consider other factors as well. That led to the recommended closing at Lake of the Woods and to proposed elimination of the Adaptive Recreation Program at Paquin Tower. The latter idea would save the city an estimated $88,000.

"The pool may just be closed for a year," Ristow said, citing the recent economic downturn as the driving force behind the cuts.

Cindy Squire of Murry, which is northeast of Columbia, worried about what a year without proper maintenance would do to the pool.

"If they shut it down for a year, there could be cracking problems," she said. "Also, frogs and snakes and things like that could get in."

Squire added that the pool's location near the city/county line draws people from outside Columbia. "Tons of folks come from the fringes to use this area," she said. "It's a nice facility and it's shaded."

Attendance at Lake of the Woods lagged last summer, attracting the lowest number of patrons in the past five years. According to the Parks and Recreation 2007 annual report, the pool brought in a total of 3,502 people last year, compared with 5,486 people in 2003.

Monica Melton, another of Friday's pool patrons, said attendance fluctuates. She said she had seen three large groups of children there Friday, but noted that the low attendance levels earlier in the year were too low for the pool to remain open.

"No one was here, and they need at least 10 people to keep it open," she said.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Charles Dudley Jr August 2, 2008 | 6:51 p.m.

They forget to tell you here about this quote:

"That led to the proposed elimination of the Adaptive Recreation Program at Paquin Tower. The latter idea would save the city an estimated $88,000."

that this is only the cost of three employee salaries of one full time specialist and two part time employees one being disabled herself. Yet they are going to hire 12 new city maintenance workers to add to the number of those city workers usually just standing around watching one city maintenance worker do most all of the work.

I feel bad as well for those people at Lake of the Woods and I understand maybe they have more people needed being it is a public pool and my question is do these programs fit in with the "Visioning Committee's" ideas for a future Columbia or not?

There is so much talk going on behind doors that is not being let out to the citizens of Columbia for them to know about.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr August 3, 2008 | 12:23 p.m.

I keep looking at this number "0.00005 percent of the total proposed operating budget" and find it so detestable that the City Of Columbia who had to have gone through the vote to build this facility now would even consider this as part of the "City Manager's Budget Proposal".

Another question I have as well is are these types of facilities built as a "money making enterprise" or as a "service provided to the citizens of Columbia" for all to enjoy in which case as a service they are not expected to make money as that is what you have other tax revenues to cover those services.

Did they build this facility for the citizens of Columbia or did they build this facility to make themselves look good in the public eye only and now it seems to only take those services away?

Each and every tax paying citizen of Columbia and surrounding areas should be asking yourselves the same questions right now and thinking about the coming times when you go to the poles to re-elect those who represent our city and it's interests.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements