MU study finds carcinogen in some Columbia wells

Thursday, September 11, 2008 | 8:11 p.m. CDT

COLUMBIA — Organic matter in nine out of 14 of Columbia's wells is contributing to the formation of a carcinogen in the city's drinking water, a new study by MU researcher Enos C. Innis has found. The study was funded by Columbia Water and Light in response to elevated levels of trihalomethanes, which are carcinogenic, reported in the city's drinking water in 2007.

In the new report, which was released after three months of testing, the wells indicate high levels of organic matter that contribute to the formation of trihalomethanes, said Connie Kacprowicz, spokeswoman for Columbia Water and Light.

Trihalomethanes are the product of a reaction between organic matter and the chlorination process used to disinfect well water before it enters the distribution system.

"There is a high level of organic components in the wells," Kacprowicz said.

Also, elevated levels of chloride found in the wells in previous studies indicate that the organic matter might be seeping underground from nearby wetlands at the Eagle Bluffs Conservation Area. Wastewater treated in city-operated wetlands is used to flood the state-owned conservation wetlands, located near city wells in the Missouri River bottoms near McBaine.

Chloride levels, used to trace organic components, have increased since the city started flooding the Eagle Bluffs wetlands with treated wastewater. Though it isn't definitive, the timeline of these effects is a cause for concern that wastewater is infiltrating the well system.

"Organic matter can come from a number of sources, such as rainwater, river water, aquifers or treated wastewater effluent," Kacprowicz said. "The higher chloride levels can be a result of any of these factors.

"I don't think we're in the position to say one way or another that the source is Eagle Bluffs," she said. "We need to see more research, but it is a possibility."

John O'Connor, an environmental engineering consultant and former MU water engineering professor, is more uneasy. He would rather see "a more urgent treatment" than a full year's worth of testing.

He said adding ammonia to neutralize the chlorine's instability could reduce the levels of trihalomethane. He said many other cities use this approach and that it actually decreases the chlorine taste in the water.

The city has considered the use of ammonia, but more testing needs to be done, Kacprowicz said.

Levels of trihalomethane in the city's drinking water have exceeded the threshold set by the federal government.

Chlorine is necessary to get rid of bacteria and other water-borne diseases. The city, in response to the higher trihalomethane levels, decreased the amount of chlorine used in the treatment process.

"It's a balancing act," O'Connor said. "You need to keep a residual amount of disinfectant in order to control microbial growth, but then there's going to be trihalomethanes. You walk a tightrope."

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Jack Norris September 12, 2008 | 1:28 p.m.

It's a balancing act indeed. I would, however, like to stress the importance of chlorine (as stated) in the water purification process. Chlorine has been used for nearly 100 years in this way, and is one of the cheapest and most readily available tools we can use to keep our water safe and clean for consumption.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr September 12, 2008 | 4:02 p.m.

What other chemicals did they not test for that could be in there too?

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr January 11, 2009 | 11:34 a.m.

Looks like this former City Of Columbia Employee is finally speaking out on this subject:

>>> John Betz said he’s pleased that Columbia is pursuing ammonia treatment to address the city’s trihalomethane problem, but he has bigger issues on his mind.

"To me, the THM problem is just the tip of the iceberg," the former director of the city’s water treatment plant said, referring to the carcinogenic byproduct formed when chlorine, a disinfectant, combines with organic material in the city’s drinking water. "I’m worried about underarm deodorant, mouthwash, pharmaceuticals. My question would be, ‘OK, we’ve taken care of the THM problem, but what about all the stuff that’s getting into the drinking water?’ "

Betz has been reading a recent draft report of the U.S. Geological Survey, an organization that has studied the water in the city’s wells near the Missouri River bottoms by McBaine since the early 1990s. <<<

I'm wondering if this gentlemen has read these article too:

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.