First red-light cameras to go up at Worley, Providence

Tuesday, September 16, 2008 | 7:30 p.m. CDT; updated 9:33 a.m. CDT, Thursday, July 9, 2009

COLUMBIA — The city expects to install two red-light cameras by the end of the year at the eastbound and westbound approaches to the intersection of Worley Street at Providence Road, despite the legal controversy surrounding the devices.

LaserCraft Inc., the Norcross, Ga.-based company contracted to manage the cameras, worked with the city last spring to do a traffic study analyzing intersections where motorists frequently run red lights. Assistant City Manager Tony St. Romaine said the city is now ready to move ahead.

"Once we get (the Missouri Department of Transportation's) approval to install those cameras, we can get that whole system up very quickly," St. Romaine said, adding that might take 60 to 90 days.

The city plans to install 14 more red-light cameras, but those locations have not been picked. Once installed, there will be at least a 30-day grace period when violators will receive warnings in the mail instead of tickets.

The city will continue ironing out its plans for red-light cameras at a meeting Sept. 24, but questions about whether the cameras are legal remain unanswered.

"I think that there will probably be issues raised with legality, that would be my expectation," said Mayor Darwin Hindman, an advocate of the cameras. "If I was a defense attorney, I would look at all the cases and form some sort of legal defense and have what we're doing tested."

The city has been stalled by legislative threats to outlaw red-light cameras in Missouri. Amendments to a state transportation bill would have required that revenue from red-light camera fines be shared with school districts, that points not be assessed against violators' driving records and that drivers only pay civil fines.

Sen. Jason Crowell, R-Cape Girardeau, was leading the charge to pass the bill, citing mistrust of the private companies who run them and the pictures taken during red lights being of the license plate, not the driver. Although nothing has passed, it's likely bills will be filed again.

"Part of the problem we've been dealing with is monitoring the legislature," said Sgt. Timothy Moriarty, Traffic Unit supervisor for the Columbia Police Department. "They keep talking about new laws and new legislation, and we've been holding back on our program."

Columbia modeled its program after one in Arnold, a city 20 miles south of St. Louis where the red-light camera ordinance is being challenged in federal court on the grounds that it unconstitutionally shifts the burden of proof to the defendant by presuming that the owner of the vehicle was the driver at the time of the violation.

Traffic defense attorney Bob Murray, of Columbia, is ready to defend any future clients in Columbia ticketed by the red-light cameras. He said the cameras are unlawful because vehicle owners ticketed will be presumed guilty. This would compel a citizen to have to testify, which he said violates the Fifth Amendment.

Murray also argues that the pictures taken of the vehicle license plates violate the Fourth Amendment as warrantless searches and seizures.

"No one's in favor of people running red lights, it's a very dangerous situation," Murray said. "But I think there are better ways to solve the problem."

Hindman said it's reasonable to charge vehicle owners with violations because there is a presumption that the owner would be driving his or her own car.

"In my opinion, you've got enough evidence there," Hindman said.

LaserCraft cameras will take pictures of the license plates of cars that run red lights. The pictures will be stamped with the time, date and location of the violation. Vehicle owners will be fined $97.50 plus a $22.50 court cost through the mail. Moriarty said that licensed owners can sign affidavits stating that they were not driving but that it is unclear whether the actual driver would then be held responsible.

"It's going to be an interesting issue, especially in the city of Columbia with such a transient population, people moving and teenagers who don't own their own cars," Moriarty said.

St. Romaine said it is basically up to the ethics of the driver to pay the ticket. And if the driver wants to go into court and swear it wasn't him or her, there won't be a record of their face on camera. The tickets will include a link to the LaserCraft Web site, where those ticketed can look up a 12-second video of their violation.

LaserCraft will receive $28.50 per ticket issued.

Along with a fine, the city intends to report violations to the Missouri Department of Revenue to determine whether points will be tallied against the driver's record.

Residents have criticized the cameras for their "Big Brother" effect and would prefer to be pulled over by a police officer, but Moriarty said it's not easy for police cars to stop someone who has run a red light. Even if officers see violations from the right vantage point, it is often difficult to go after them in traffic.

"The whole idea really is to reduce accidents," Moriarty said, "and it's not really meant to be put up as a secret spy type of thing to get a bunch of money for the city, which doesn't go to the Police Department."

The push for red-light cameras began in 1997, when Hindman first asked for an examination of the cost and effectiveness of the systems.

"I always thought it was an important thing to do," Hindman said. "Naturally, I'm anxious to see it put into place. I'm disappointed that it has taken so long, but I think it is an important step in the right direction."


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Susan Gill September 17, 2008 | 11:25 a.m.

I've been dealing with the red-light cameras in Riverside, Ca., for a couple of years now. The technology employed on our cameras can actually have a picture of your face along with your license plate. Why is this not the technology being used in Columbia's new cameras? This way, the courts will have definite proof as to who was driving, and the courts won't be bogged down with people trying to challenge the tickets. Also, our fines in the area vary from $420-460; that definitely discourages drivers from running red lights.

At first it was annoying, but with all the accidents I've seen at intersections caused by people who run the lights, I think that the harsh fine has been working to make people more aware of their safety and the safety of others.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz September 17, 2008 | 12:15 p.m.

This seems like an odd location for red light cameras. The north and south approaches likely have far more traffic than the east and west approaches. I also can't recall seeing many red light violations at this intersection when going to and coming from work.

This intersection is also not one of the top 14 intersections for accidents reported, according to a report from Sgt. Moriarty, as represented in a graphic from a late March story in the Missourian. I had previously requested information from the Columbia Police Department regarding crash causes for various intersections in Columbia, but don't seem to have that information handy at the moment. Seems like the Missourian might want to get those statistics for future stories and see if red light cameras are put in the correct places.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.