advertisement

Public suffers when Congress, Wall Street aren't transparent

Saturday, October 4, 2008 | 10:00 a.m. CDT; updated 3:09 p.m. CDT, Wednesday, October 8, 2008

This column has been edited to remove a quote from John Snowling at the request of the author, who said he believes the quote adds confusion to the transparency argument. It has also been edited to correct Sen. Bill Nelson's name.

As the nation sloshes through the wreckage of Hurricane Subprime, wondering what fails next, transparency is suddenly a buzzword on the tips of many a congressional tongue.

A quick Google search unveils the nation's leaders calling, again and again, for less Byzantine processes, for financial information to be unleashed to the investing public, for a veritable flood of sunshine to sweep down Wall Street.

MoreStory


Related Media

Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., was emblematic of the openness movement in the nation's capitol.

"Any proposal needs to help homeowners restructure their mortgages to avoid foreclosure. Also, we need more transparency and accountability from Wall Street; and, we need to rein in excessive executive pay that isn't based on performance," Nelson said.

Others echoed that sentiment, from Sen. John McCain (who called for "transparency and accountability" on Wall Street) to Sen. Barack Obama and heck, even Ralph Nader, who has been calling for greater transparency on Wall Street for years now.

It's heartening to see America's political leadership seize on the secrecy plaguing our financial instruments, but excuse me for getting too giddy after Congress spent the better half of the week in an endless series of closed-door meetings.

That's right: in case you didn't notice, every substantial meeting in which our national leadership discussed the most dire threat to the country's well-being in modern history occurred after the press was ushered into the hallways. Secrecy has become such an accepted part of the Beltway landscape that no one seemed to protest even a little.

Surely I don't think that the ticklish negotiations over the bailout bill could take place in the light of day? Well, yes, I do. I subscribe to the quixotic notion that our elected representatives should put on their big-boy pants and do the job, free from smoke-filled rooms that embolden ideologues and provide valuable cover for discussions of election-year politics.

I ask you: could the negotiations have been less poisonous, less public interest-minded, in public, where the American taxpayer could hear directly from their elected representatives? Could the electorate have been a bit more informed with a more direct stake in the process?

It's asking a lot for a legislative culture that embraces such endemic secrecy to ask greater transparency of private companies.

A head-turning piece on the website of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press raises the troubling possibility that the accounting measures adopted by the banking industry, with the tacit approval of congressional oversight bodies, fueled the debacle.

"Some experts say the problem is not that banks and other financial services companies are required to give out more data than before, or that they're not following the rules, but others disagree," the story said.

But without access to that data, we're left to rely on the good graces of others, essentially taking for granted how the balance sheet data was computed and with what accounting methods. Others dispute that notion, arguing that accounting rules are not the problem.

"Accounting helped to make this crisis less of a crisis, if that's possible," Charles Mulford, an accounting expert and professor at Georgia Tech University, who favors disclosure of those methods, told the Reporters Committee. It gave the public a better read sooner rather than later on the problems banks are facing, he said.

I have no idea — one look at my bank balance and you'll know accounting is not my forte — but I suspect the weakness of the system has less to do with the accounting and more to do with accountability itself. The transparency problem might lie less with Wall Street and far more with the regulatory apparatus and Congress, where despite the best efforts of accountants, such disclosures mean little if you can't look at a balance sheet when assets have been securitized and know, at a glance, the obligations of the company. Closed government meets murky Wall Street, and the rest of us suffer.

Perhaps Congress can hold another round-robin marathon of closed meetings and tell us more about the transparency movement they've hatched.

Charles Davis is the executive director of the National Freedom of Information Center and an associate professor for the MU School of Journalism.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Greg Johnson October 4, 2008 | 11:37 a.m.

Charles, thanks. Yes, esoteric and shady accounting are major plausible factors in this crisis. These require sunlight and intelligence if health is to be restored to our economy. Bailouts are more like stopgap blood transfusions.

Still, a statement attributed to Mark Twain comes to mind: "It's not the parts of the Bible I don't understand that scare me, it's the parts I do understand." I understand borrowing and loaning that require continuing inflation of property value--and that scares me plenty! Can our leaders and our pundits look squarely at this real money? The virtual money--the bundling and buying of debt--might take then care of itself.

(Report Comment)
CA Wren October 4, 2008 | 11:55 a.m.

JOE SIXPACK AS PRESIDENT

Sarah Palin has portrayed herself as a kind of “Joe Six-pack”

I do not want a vice president that winks and says GOLLY.

Palin did not stumble. She memorized her material well. However the vision of Chatty Cathy kept coming to mind.

Joe six-pack dealing with the economy, war or the security of our country?

With no talking point cards to help her? What then?

John McCain is the oldest individual to run for the Office of President.

The Thought Of

Sarah PALIN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Chills me to the BONE!

Given McCains age and health history

Ms. Palin could in deed become Commander in Chief.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements