Obama: Nothing to fear here

Wednesday, November 5, 2008 | 10:00 a.m. CST; updated 2:05 p.m. CST, Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Dear Voter,

If your candidate lost, I offer my condolences. From 2000-2008, I lived with the frustration of an administration that didn’t match me politically or spiritually. It’s too early to tell what an Obama presidency will bring, but there is great news. He is not a socialist, communist or terrorist. He’s not anti-American, elitist or a dim-witted celebrity. He’s not Hollywood, not a slick-talking politician willing to do anything for a vote; he’s not even smooth.

In unscripted speeches, Obama pauses frequently, uses “ums” as placeholders and accents words in a way that create unintended periods in the middle of his sentences. The New York Times Magazine’s Matthew Bai followed the president-elect through coal country and writes, “Obama gives the impression that he’s going to show up and make his case, and if you don’t fall in love with him, well, he’ll just have to pick up the pieces and go on.”


There's no way to predict what a president-elect will pursue, so we rely on the only thing that counts: our opinion. There are a whole bunch of elated people right now and an almost-equal number not quite so much. In dedication to an inevitably bittersweet electorate, here are two columns.

Related Media

Related Articles

Obama’s case is not faith-based, and that’s a good thing. It means our next president will be able to work with policymakers who don’t share his religious views and who may not be considered friends. As Obama noted in his 2004 dismantling of Alan Keyes, personal faith doesn’t always translate well into public policy. The United States is too diverse for a politician’s deeply personal feelings to be efficiently channeled into productive lawmaking. Obama is a religious man, though, and as we found out through the Jeremiah Wright narrative, he goes to church. He told Bai, “This is a nation of believers, and I’m one of them.”

Obama is not ultra-liberal or even really a liberal. His policies will likely be rooted in nonpartisan utilitarianism, which  — let me peel off a label here — would make him a progressive moderate. In addition to a plurality of the popular and electoral vote, Obama attracted endorsements from Ken Adelman, a member of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board and a former Reagan adviser; Doug Kmiec, a legal counsel for Reagan and George H.W. Bush and a columnist for the Catholic News Service; Lawrence Korb, Reagan’s assistant secretary of defense; David Ruder, Reagan-appointed former chair of the SEC; and Paul Volcker, chairman of the Federal Reserve under Reagan. Colin Powell, Warren Buffett, professional wrestlers Hulk Hogan and Mick Foley, Emmitt Smith and poker legend Doyle Brunson — endorsements. Kirbyjon Caldwell, President Bush’s spiritual adviser and the man who gave him inaugural benedictions in 2001 and 2005, endorsed Barack Obama. Sam Maverick’s granddaughter did too.

Obama is a Washington outsider, free from weighted friendships and longstanding feuds that channel partisanship. He’s not going to invite Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer over for Skittles just because they’re Democrats, and I’d like to think Mitt Romney will be up front on his Rolodex. I expect Obama to be a lot like Michael Bloomberg, the Massachusetts-to-New York mayor who also bypassed public campaign funding.

Bloomberg flat-out just doesn’t care about party lines (lifelong Democrat, ran as a Republican, now an independent) or media bytes. He’ll sit down with Hasidic Jews (uh-oh, extremist?) but still support the Patriot Act (maybe, but at least he’s our extremist). He frowns on union strikes but only accepts a $1 salary. Obama will take on issues case-by-case. He won’t take away guns, won’t fight against religion, won’t make America into a pacifist welfare state.

The Obama presidency will also be good for the Republican Party. Without serious competition for Bush’s first six years and with consolidated, bad leadership throughout, it lost its conservative steam. Give the GOP four years of Democratic competition, and it should be vigorous again to better serve its constituents.

Greg T. Spielberg is a graduate student at the Missouri School of Journalism and a former assistant city editor for the Columbia Missourian.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Jim Dog November 6, 2008 | 4:28 p.m.

Maybe if you keep telling yourself this, Greg, it will come true...

What is the VERY FIST thing that Obama does as President elect? He names D.C.'s most partisan hack, Rahm Emanuel, as chief of staff.

(Report Comment)
Ray Shapiro November 6, 2008 | 5:19 p.m.

Greg is idealistic and hopeful. I too hope that an Obama administration unites this country more than it divides. He is politically beholding to his party for where he is today, and to those who voted him in. If he wants to lead from party strength, Rahm Emanuel fits. If he wants to also address the "Greg's" who also voted for him, time will tell. If President-elect Obama is the kind of politician I think he is, he will do both, unless he aspires to be a one-termer. I'd also hate to see the "Greg's of today," have their hopes and idealism shattered by disapointment. Let the "new man on the block" get his "ducks" in order, do his job in the White House and watch him and hold him more accountable than we did Bush, if you choose, but wait awhile before you give him his performance review or bi-annual report card. That would be most fair and appropriate considering the times we now live in.

(Report Comment)
Mike Clutts November 10, 2008 | 11:01 a.m.

I would like to agree with you but facts will start to prove otherwise. It started with Obama's first appointment as chief of staff. He appointed someone who is as partisan as they come. We can only go on his past performance, and that performance suggest that he is strictly a partisan person. I like to hope that he can bring something different, but if this pick is evident of the rest of his decisions then we will have the same partisan politics that has gone on for years and will see a one term and done for president.

(Report Comment)
Ayn Rand November 10, 2008 | 11:14 a.m.

I think it started before that, Mike. Look at his VP pick. Biden is about as partisan as they come.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.