I get it: Daniel-Vandiver story didn't fit moment

Friday, November 14, 2008 | 12:00 p.m. CST

Dear Reader,

I get it.


Related Media

Related Articles

I think.

A week ago, and the Missourian published on their front pages a story about the girlfriend of Chase Daniel.

Uproar ensued.

The story ran 1,000 words; opinion from readers ran more than 9,000 words in the comments section online. I received e-mails and was stopped in the street. Debates – some of them quite emotional – broke out in newsrooms and classrooms at the MU School of Journalism.

As I drove home Wednesday evening, I even heard discussion on KCOU, a radio station more given to cutting edge music than journalistic critique.

My initial reaction: Huh?

The story described the courtship between Daniel and Blaire Vandiver, who have been dating for more than a year. There were no allegations made, no wrongdoing exposed — just a nice piece on a young woman and the most popular football player in greater Mizzouland.

Some of the complaints centered on the story’s prominence. I get that. It could have been relegated to the sports section.

Others said the story wasn’t newsworthy. No question there. One of the young deejays on KCOU used the phrase “interest worthy.” That’s a better description.

Another complaint: The story was too one-dimensional by defining Vandiver only by her relationship with Daniel. OK (though editor Greg Bowers and reporter Brittany Darwell never conceived it as a full profile of the young woman).

In making the decision about placement, several editors said they worried about “voter fatigue” – so many heavy stories in such a short span. They underestimated the continuing hunger for hard news, which frankly newspapers haven’t seen from readers for a while now.

I could see the opinions. I couldn’t understand the emotional response.

Art Schneider helped. “We are, perhaps, in a benchmark period in American history,” he wrote in an e-mail.

Perhaps the Vandiver-Daniel story served as an affront to the seriousness of the moment.

The world, and our country’s democracy, may be on the cusp of major change, and there’s no guarantee the direction will be positive.

The economy is a full-on collision on the interstate. We the People are now We the Panicked. More people are going hungry. Businesses are failing.

Meanwhile, the election pumped a sense of optimism – tentative, yes, with asterisks scattered about like flakes in a snow globe – among many people here and around the globe.

The Missourian has done plenty of light features. A newspaper is filled with things such as comics, advice columns and games. Fun stories and profiles often grace the front page or home page. Editors sometimes say they are “for the mix,” to give variety to an otherwise serious or depressing page.

But many of you have said not at this moment, when you want your newspaper to reflect the mood and voice of this time.

I get it.


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Charles Dudley Jr November 14, 2008 | 5:00 p.m.

Let them cry IMHO. Publish and portray the stories your staff feel as a consensus view are good and upstanding and the staff after a consensus discussion think some readers will like if not all. Nobody is ever going to like everything you post or publish but that is how it goes.

Do not kiss the general public's back sides just to sell a paper because then you lose track of your real mission and that is to be true to the spirit of journalism.

Many many small newspapers die off yearly due they bow down to the general public trying to please all and in the end lose sight of themselves.

Journalism is all about human interest and as such there are so many aspects of human interest types of stories that they can never be truly fathomed from somebody just petting a dog on the street to a huge formal wedding to something more serious as somebody who was loved by the community passing away.

Just do not ever second guess or lower your own expectations to meet the cries of the public in general as then as I stated you will lose track of yourself and your mission.

I think you are doing a very fine job and to all of you who don't go put your job applications in at the Missourian and get off your back side and go work along side the editors,reporters,print operators,distributors and contributors who create this paper every day so we all can enjoy not only local news but a little bit of national news as well.

Go work for change instead of sitting behind your monitor crying for it but unwilling to go do the real leg work.

(Report Comment)
Rachel Davis November 19, 2008 | 11:48 p.m.

Tom, what in the world are you talking about?

(Report Comment)
James Herring December 30, 2008 | 2:08 p.m.

Again, let me say that I liked the article. I get tired of doom and gloom and all the negativity that goes on in the world and seems to get reported. This is what I like about the Missourian. Keep up the good work.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.