advertisement

Report says Missouri universities', colleges' tuition may soar, economy may suffer

Tuesday, December 23, 2008 | 8:13 p.m. CST; updated 10:43 a.m. CST, Wednesday, February 11, 2009

COLUMBIA — Potential cuts in state funding for colleges and universities could result in extreme tuition increases, the possible closing of one university and a negative impact on the state's economy, the Missouri Department of Higher Education reported Tuesday.

The report, which was submitted to the General Assembly on Monday, summarizes potential impacts of funding reductions at state universities and colleges. The information was an overview of all cuts facing state-funded institutions and highlighted several where the impacts would severely impair a school’s ability to serve its students.

Among those listed:

  • Harris-Stowe State University: Cuts of 20 to 25 percent could force the school to close.
  • Missouri Southern State University: Tuition increases of 23 to 38 percent would be needed to account for lost funding.
  • Missouri Western State University: A 25 percent cut would take $1.3 million away from scholarships, financial aid and employment opportunities.
  • Missouri State University: A 25 percent budget cut would equal more than the total amount of scholarships and financial aid awarded to students, or the entire budget of any of the colleges at the university.  
  • Truman State University: A 25 percent reduction, and possible cuts of 15 and 20 percent, would prevent the institution from fulfilling its mission as a highly selective public liberal arts institution.

Reductions in state funding could lead universities to ask for a waiver from a state law that prevents raising tuition above the Consumer Price Index, a common measure of inflation.   

Community colleges also would be hit hard by funding reductions, and tuition increases of up to 17.4 percent were predicted along with the potential closure of some facilities.  State Fair Community College would have to eliminate its Lake of the Ozarks Education Center and two campus childcare centers in St. Louis, the report said.  Additionally, the report summarized potential layoffs of up to 234 positions.  

University and college administrators and state officials warn that further reductions in funding would limit access to higher education and threaten Missouri's economy.

Constance Gully, the vice president for business and financial affairs at Harris-Stowe State University in St. Louis, said tuition would have to be increased beyond what many Harris-Stowe students could afford, and they would no longer be able to continue their education. Enrollment declines would result in revenue losses that could threaten the school's continued existence, Gully said.

Gully also said that if Harris-Stowe were closed, the student population would not have an alternative for higher education. The mission statement for the university is to provide affordable education to St. Louis residents who would not necessarily be served by other institutions.

"They would have a huge population that would be eliminated as far as access to higher education. Our prayer is that cuts will not reach 20 to 25 percent," Gully said.

The report also predicted that reduced state funding would lead to several academic programs being eliminated at community colleges, including technical education, career education and continued education.

Evelyn Jorgenson, the president of Moberly Area Community College, said that the school's student population is largely made up of adults retraining for new jobs or part-time students who are already struggling to afford community college.

In addition to potential layoffs contributing to Missouri's unemployment rate — which, according to the U.S. Department of Labor, is up 1 percent compared with this time a year ago — funding reductions would affect local businesses across mid-Missouri, Jorgenson said.

"We have nearly as many students in Columbia as we do in Moberly. There will be impact on businesses that sell us equipment and supplies, students that have to pay more for tuition, and if positions are eliminated, there would be continued unemployment," Jorgenson said.

Community colleges serve a critical role in bad economic times, said Paul Wagner, deputy commissioner of the Missouri Department of Higher Education.

"In times of economic downturn, community college enrollment goes up. When you cut institutional funding in this environment, when they're some of the most poorly funded in the nation, you can't expect them to teach and serve the same number of students," Wagner said.

Wagner was the primary author of the report, which states that institutions of higher education account for $3 billion of the state's economy. The report also predicts that reduced state funding would have a proportional effect on local communities.

Missouri Southern University, located in Joplin, could raise tuition by as much as 38 percent. Spokesperson Rod Surber was concerned what impact such an increase would have on the school's students and the region's economy.

"We believe that Missouri Southern is one of the economic engines of the region. We have about 500 employees; we generate a lot of revenue in this region," Surber said.

Surber, like other university and college administrators, said he worries about the effects of tuition increases on students who are already struggling to make ends meet.

"About 30 percent of our students are non-traditional; a lot of those students have families and children to pay for in addition to paying for school," Surber said.

Wagner said the Department of Higher Education submitted the summary report on Monday to both the Missouri State House of Representatives and Senate appropriations committees.

Missouri ranks No. 47 in the nation in per capita support for higher education, spending $159 per student as compared with $297 in Kansas, $303 in Arkansas, and $227 in Illinois. Missouri's low ranking is largely the result of spending cuts in 2001-02, when the state budget was balanced by reducing higher education funding, according to the report.

"These scenarios are really the beginning of this conversation," said Wagner, who expects the issue will not be resolved until the state budget is finalized this spring.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Robert Johnson December 24, 2008 | 8:06 a.m.

We also have a constitution that does not let us spend in a deficit. That forces us to make tough choices and often puts us at the bottom of lists in regards to what states pay for this or that.

It also eliminates the state from being on the verge of bankruptcy like California or New York.

I guess my point is that many states are spending more than Missouri but not having to balance the books so its not a fair comparison. Imagine if you had a limitless credit card. You would probably spend more on EVERYTHING than someone who budgets carefully etc.

(Report Comment)
Ayn Rand December 24, 2008 | 8:33 a.m.

But responsible states will be forced to bail out irresponsible ones.

(Report Comment)
Wayne Duncan December 24, 2008 | 8:54 a.m.

There has to be something wrong with the way Missouri handles it money. AR finished 2007 fiscal year with right at a billion dollar surplus and their total tax bite is much lower than MO plus a number of types of income are not even taxed in AR. In 2005 we moved to Arkansas from Columbia because of the lower taxes. My guess is that MO is wasting a lot of money on nonsense stuff that AR is not. That is why they can spend $303 per student while MO limps along at $157.

(Report Comment)
Robert Johnson December 24, 2008 | 9:24 a.m.

And responsible people will be forced to bail out the irresponsible like our current mortgage crisis.

Thats life I guess.

I dont know about the arkansas/missouri thing.

(Report Comment)
Robert Johnson December 24, 2008 | 9:29 a.m.

Taxes are higher in Arkansas.

State sales taxes are 6% compared to 4.225 in missouri.
Gasoline taxes are 21.87 cents per gallon compared to 17.6 cents in missouri
Income taxes are 1-7% compared to 1.5-6% in Missouri.

You might have been talking about property taxes which would be up to the individual county and not state.

(Report Comment)
Shirley Baugher December 24, 2008 | 2:30 p.m.

It seems the real issue is one of economic development. And higher education is critical to the economy of a state. Perhaps MO has too many institutuions of higher education; most states do. However, a lack of investment in higher education AND the public schools is a lack of investment in our futures.

(Report Comment)
Ayn Rand December 24, 2008 | 2:37 p.m.

Shirley, explain how Missouri secondary schools are underfunded.

(Report Comment)
Shirley Baugher December 28, 2008 | 2:04 p.m.

Ayn, I didn't say secondary schools were underfunded..I indicated that all public education is important to a strong economic state...

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr December 28, 2008 | 2:23 p.m.

Shirley Baugher such is true but that first must start in the home first and foremost but until that happens in our society in this country everything coming up out of this issue is so much spitting into the wind.

(Report Comment)
Wayne Duncan December 28, 2008 | 6:33 p.m.

Its true that AR sales tax is higher than MO at 6% for nonfood items and 3% for food items. However, local sales tax are much lower, so the total is about the same as MO. The 5 cents a gallon higher gas tax provides for good surface road although many are crooked, especially in the northern part of the state. When it comes to income tax, social security income is not taxed and each person can drop $6000 of pension income from taxes. On real estate taxes each household gets a $350 tax credit and if your 65 your real estate taxes cannot be increase regardless of the appraised value. Even if your under 65, real estate taxes can only go up 5% per year regardless of how the appraised value may go up.

(Report Comment)
Ayn Rand December 30, 2008 | 11:43 a.m.

Shirley, you did say that secondary schools are underfunded: "However, a lack of investment in higher education AND the public schools is a lack of investment in our futures."

(Report Comment)
Emmanuel Tiagaraj April 15, 2009 | 10:37 p.m.

Hi friends, i have received a lot of good information in your page. I have an idea here. We can know more about drug rehabilitation here.
______________________________________________________________
Emmanuel

<a href="http://www.drug-intervention.com/missouri-drug-intervention.html">Drug Intervention Missouri</a>

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements