Missouri judge rejects lawsuit over stem cell research

Thursday, January 15, 2009 | 4:44 p.m. CST; updated 5:32 p.m. CST, Thursday, January 15, 2009

JEFFERSON CITY — For the second time, a Missouri trial judge ruled against critics of embryonic stem cell research who want to block state funds from going to life science grants.

At issue is $21 million that would flow from the Life Sciences Research Trust Fund to the Life Sciences Research Board, which then distributes the money as research grants.

Stem cell critics sued over fears for how the money is to be used.

In November, Judge Richard Callahan rejected the lawsuit. He let the critics refile, but sided with the state again on Thursday.

The lawsuit contended that existing limits on how life science grants can be used were trumped by a 2006 constitutional amendment endorsing stem cell research. The stem cell critics had argued that without the restrictions, the life science grants shouldn't be allowed.


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.