McCaskill slams Wall Street's use of bailout money

Saturday, January 31, 2009 | 4:01 p.m. CST

KANSAS CITY — Sen. Claire McCaskill chastised Wall Street executives who gave out $18.4 billion in bonuses after accepting a federal bailout and proposed limits on some of their salaries.

"They don't get it," McCaskill said Friday on the U.S. Senate floor. "These people are idiots."

McCaskill's proposal would force companies taking federal bailout money to limit compensation for any employee to $400,000 a year. The compensation cap would cover salary, bonuses and stock options.

This week's estimate of $18.4 billion in bonuses for Wall Street executives came from the New York state comptroller, who could not estimate how much of that money — if any — came from taxpayers.

President Obama on Thursday called bankers "shameful" for giving themselves bonuses, after the federal government bailed them out.

But critics called McCaskill's plan shortsighted. Some of the bailout money also included more modest bonuses for workers from human resources representatives to secretaries. Many of the bonuses were contractually guaranteed before the banks' troubles escalated.

"It's a stupid idea," said Woody Cozad, a lobbyist, commentator and Republican from Missouri. "I don't defend anyone who's at those companies now, but if they all need to be replaced, you're not going to replace them with anybody very good for $400,000."

So far, Missouri banks have received $641 million under the Troubled Assets Relief Program and Kansas banks have received $77 million.

McCaskill's legislation, called the Cap Executive Officer Pay Act, was referred to a Senate committee. Under the measure, firms could resume paying their executives whatever they want after the companies had repaid all their bailout money.


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Rocky Macy January 31, 2009 | 4:44 p.m.

Lobbyist Cozad's remark is laughable. The current crop of executives at these bailed-out corporations ran their organizations into the ground. Bring in the rookies and let them show the stuffed shirts how to run a business. And, yes, there are very skilled people out there who would be willing and eager to prove themselves in the business world for $400,000 a year!

Give 'em hell, Claire!

(Report Comment)
John Schultz January 31, 2009 | 8:45 p.m.

I liked the analysis of President Obama's annual benefits that one organization did (sorry, no link at the moment) and showed that his annual take, with benefits, housing, staff, etc. would be just under $60 million.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.