Truck-only lanes to be topic for public hearing Wednesday

Tuesday, March 3, 2009 | 9:18 p.m. CST; updated 1:49 p.m. CST, Wednesday, March 4, 2009

COLUMBIA — The Missouri Department of Transportation is scheduled to host a public session in Columbia Wednesday about truck-only lanes on Interstate 70.

The truck-only lanes have received preliminary approval from the Federal Highway Administration. The proposal is a new strategy for the Improve I-70 program that seeks to widen the interstate across Missouri.

If you go

WHAT: Missouri Department of Transportation public hearing for Improve I-70 project

WHEN: 4-7 p.m. Wednesday

WHERE: Activity and Recreation Center, 1701 W. Ash St.

Related Links

Related Articles

The state and federal agencies have studied ways to improve the 50-year-old interstate since 1999. The most recent study, completed in 2006, recommended expanding rural stretches of the interstate to six lanes. According to the design, the stretch in Columbia between Stadium Boulevard and U.S. 63 would be expanded to eight lanes.

That plan also suggested that the state redesign and rebuild certain interchanges and bridges.

The new strategy still calls for rebuilding and widening the interstate to eight lanes through Columbia. The entire interstate will be eight lanes, with two lanes in each direction for general traffic and two lanes in each direction for trucks.

Bob Brendel, outreach coordinator for MoDOT, said the retooled plan with truck lanes would require no additional land than earlier designs.

This alternative, Brendel said, arose from public concerns of mounting truck traffic and a national effort to improve freight flow.

"We have heard overwhelming support," Brendel said. The goal of the hearings being held around the state, he said, "is to determine if this strategy fits within the footprint the previous study identified."

Columbia officials could not comment on the city's position in the matter.

Even though the response to creating lanes dedicated to truck traffic has been positive, Brendel said there is no funding available for the project's estimated cost of $3.9 billion. But the department will continue the process, which Brendel said would allow construction to begin more quickly should funding become available.

Officials at the public session will present a report evaluating how the truck-only lanes alter the effects and recommendations found in earlier studies. Brendel said a $2 million grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation funded the latest study.

The report states truck lanes would enhance safety, decrease travel times and increase efficient movement of goods. Such lanes would better handle the weight of large commercial vehicles and could ease traffic flow in times when general traffic lanes are closed.

The truck-only lanes span a 200-mile corridor from Independence to Lake St. Louis. Some more complicated ramps, including those at Stadium Boulevard and U.S. 63, would be redone to provide semis interchanges to their specified lanes.

Such studies are required for the state to receive federal funding for major highway improvements, which can cover up to 80 percent of the costs.

Following the hearings, Brendel said the transportation department evaluates the public comments and determines if it must make changes to the plan. A final draft of the document goes to the Federal Highway Administration for approval. The state Highways and Transportation Commission gives final approval. Then, Brendel said, the plan will "sit on the shelf" until funding becomes available.

"The funding decision will be made by somebody other than MoDOT," he said. "The legislature or citizens will determine at what level they want to fund. It's an expensive project that would require funding above the level at which MoDOT is funded today."

The Improve I-70 program reported that commercial trucks account for 30 percent of the highway's daily traffic. That traffic is expected to double by 2030.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Anthony De Sporenza March 4, 2009 | 4:43 p.m.

This is the wrong link, FYI. I'm trying to navigate to FS No. 9.

(Report Comment)
Anthony De Sporenza March 4, 2009 | 4:51 p.m.

While I'm here, this project sounds nightmarish. Eight lanes? I think it will create more accidents rather than less. Good article, though.

By the by, on Campbell Brown last night they were bashing this project

for not really "counting" as stimulus, as if rural projects don't don't matter. To me, building things that weren't properly funded is is the whole point. Thirty jobs are created and we don't have bridge collapse.

(Report Comment)
Ayn Rand March 4, 2009 | 5:03 p.m.

Can you imagine how many businesses would have to be bought out to make room for the new 63-70 interchange, plus the road itself? I-70 Drive SE also would be wiped out.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr March 4, 2009 | 6:37 p.m.

How come Mayor Darwy did not have a fire hat on too?

(Report Comment)
John Schultz March 4, 2009 | 9:05 p.m.

Ayn, my understanding is that I-70 Drive SE already has a precarious future based on the six-lane widening that is theoretically planned for I-70 (once Missouri hits the Powerball a few dozen times to come up with the money to pay for it, of course).

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.