advertisement

Court upholds Missouri 'Choose Life' license plate decision

Thursday, March 26, 2009 | 5:11 p.m. CDT; updated 5:56 p.m. CDT, Friday, March 27, 2009

KANSAS CITY — A federal appeals court on Thursday upheld a lower court's ruling that required Missouri officials to issue license plates that read "Choose Life."

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis agreed with a federal judge who ruled last year that the state's process for approving or disallowing specialty license plates was unconstitutional.

Missouri officials began issuing the plates last month and about 170 are on the roads now, said Department of Revenue spokesman Ted Farnen.

The Alliance Defense Fund sued in June 2006 on behalf of Choose Life of Missouri and the group's president. The lawsuit alleged lawmakers violated free speech, due process and equal protection rights by rejecting Choose Life's application for the specialty plate, while approving other proposals.

The lawsuit named as defendants then-Department of Revenue Director Trish Vincent and the 14 members of a joint House and Senate Transportation Committee, which rejected the application after two members who support abortion rights objected without giving a reason.

For a new specialty plate to be approved, no committee members can oppose it. A formal objection from two senators or five House members before a vote also kills it.

The lawsuit claimed the process was unfair because there was no objective or written criteria for the committee to decide whether to approve a plate design.

U.S. District Judge Scott Wright agreed, ruling in January 2008 that the Choose Life plates had to be issued and finding that the state law governing specialty plates was "unconstitutionally vague and overbroad."

During arguments before the 8th Circuit in October, Missouri's attorneys argued that messages on state-issued license plates constitute government speech and can be restricted.

But the 8th Circuit, referring to legal decisions governing Choose Life plates in South Carolina, Tennessee, Arizona and Illinois, said the plates were private speech.

"Because the 'Choose Life' plate is different from the standard Missouri license plate, a reasonable observer would understand that the vehicle owner took the initiative to purchase the specialty plate and is voluntarily communicating his or her own message, not the message of the state," the three-judge panel wrote.

The court said that without any objective criteria for approving plate designs, the state law gives the joint committee members "unbridled discretion to determine who may speak based on the viewpoint of the speaker ... and is therefore unconstitutional."

Joel Oster, an attorney with the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative Christian legal organization, said group was pleased with the decision.

"The court recognized that the license plate constituted private speech and that the pro-life message can't be censored just because a couple of pro-choice senators disagree with that message," Oster said.

A spokesman for the Missouri attorney general's office, which represented the state in the lawsuit, did not immediately return a phone call for comment.

Farnen said a decision hadn't been made yet on how to proceed with the case.

In light of the "Choose Life" lawsuit, state lawmakers have considered changing how the state approves specialty plates.

A measure that has been approved by the Senate and is currently before the House would return power of approving specialty plates to the full legislature, which had that authority until 2004.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Ray Shapiro March 26, 2009 | 7:08 p.m.

"Because the 'Choose Life' plate is different from the standard Missouri license plate, a reasonable observer would understand that the vehicle owner took the initiative to purchase the specialty plate and is voluntarily communicating his or her own message, not the message of the state," the three-judge panel wrote.
--While I am against abortion being used as a form of birth control, part of one's lifestyle or just taken too lightly, I do believe that any voluntary termination of a pregnancy should be the ultimate decision of the woman, in conjunction with meetings with a spiritual advisor, psychiatrist, social worker, medical doctor, her family and the baby's daddy.
As for special "Choose Life" plates, which are not vanity plates but specially designed template plates, the state should stay out of controversial, political/religious messages.

As stated in the article...The court said that without any objective criteria for approving plate designs, the state law gives the joint committee members "unbridled discretion to determine who may speak based on the viewpoint of the speaker ... and is therefore unconstitutional."
Therefore, in my opinion, "objective criteria" is needed in the specialty plates' program or the state should do away with it entirely and let people go back to bumper stickers and plate frames. Otherwise, the state will be getting itself into the advertising business,which could get messy if there are no censor or "objective" criteria. When the religious right gets its plates, it's time for the Pro-Choice movement, the KKK, neo-Nazi groups, Libertarians, Democrats, Republicans, Communists, Socialists, NORML and every other cause to get theirs. State's should find more "dignified" revenue gimmicks then this.
Of interest:
The politics of license plates. - By Dahlia Lithwick - Slate Magazine ...
... House of Representatives approved the creation of specialty " Choose Life" license plates. ... Photograph of Virginia House of Delegates representative Richard Black by Sue ...
http://www.slate.com/id/2078247

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements