Weighing the options of going green

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 | 7:32 p.m. CDT; updated 9:51 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Bell peppers at the Columbia Farmers Market, shown here in 2008.

The messages are everywhere: Save the planet. Reduce your carbon footprint. Be eco-wise.

But how do consumers decide which product or action is healthiest or more environmentally friendly? Sometimes the choices are clear; other times they're murky. Here are a few assessments:


Related Media

Related Articles

Paper v. plastic.

Both can be made from recycled materials and are recyclable. Paper is made by cutting down trees — which help absorb greenhouse gases — but then again, they're renewable. Plastic bags are often made of polyethylene, produced from natural gas, which is an abundant resource but not a renewable one.

But it takes more water and energy to make paper bags than it does to produce plastic bags. Neither breaks down particularly fast in a landfill; though paper is compostible, plastics don't biodegrade easily.

An alternative is taking your own reusable cloth or plastic bag to the store. But consumers shouldn't stress too much, as long as they're recycling or reusing store bags, whether by filling paper with newspapers for recycling or carrying their lunch in plastic, said Chris Newman, an environmental scientist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Compact fluorescent light bulbs v. incandescent.

Compact fluorescent light bulbs, or CFLs, last longer and use less energy, but they also are more expensive and contain toxic mercury. That means consumers must be careful how they clean up the bulbs if they break and also dispose of them properly.

Mercury also is a byproduct of burning coal, and the extra electricity needed to power incandescent bulbs often comes from coal-fired power plants. The toxin, which can cause neurological damage in children, may get into the food chain after settling into lakes and streams.

Eventually both CFLs and incandescent bulbs probably will be replaced by solid-state, or LED, lighting. But until then, environmental groups generally advocate consumers use CFLs, though people with children will want to use extra caution.

You can safely dispose of your CFLs at Columbia’s Household Hazardous Waste Facility from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. on the first and third Saturdays of the month, from April to November. The facility is located at 1313 Lakeview Ave.

Organic v. conventionally grown food.

It's true that organic food, grown or raised without pesticides or herbicides, could be better for your health and the ecosystem. But if it is shipped from thousands of miles away, there is an environmental trade-off because of the pollution caused by trucks traveling cross-country.

Some experts say you might want to consider passing on organic produce, for example, if it has a thick skin, like bananas, or outer leaves, like corn. You also could make a point of buying locally grown food.

If you’re looking to buy local, head to a farmers market.

The Columbia Farmers Market is open from 8 a.m. to noon on Saturdays in March through November, and from 4 to 6 p.m. on Mondays and Wednesdays starting in May. The market is behind the Activity and Recreation Center, 1701 W. Ash St.

The Boone County Farmers Market is open from 8 a.m. to noon on Saturdays from April 4 to Oct. 31 for 2009, and from 4 to 6 p.m. on Mondays and Wednesdays starting May 11 through Sept. 23. The market is located at 1005 W. Worley St., behind the Sanford-Kimpton Health Department.

Drive-thru v. getting out of the car.

Idling a car engine for more than 10 seconds emits more pollution than turning it off and back on again. So if you're able, environmentalists recommend that you park your car and walk into the fast-food restaurant or the bank. Many cities recommend that drivers avoid idling as much as possible, especially on days when alerts are issued because of ground-level ozone and soot.

Or better yet, walk to the restaurant. If you can safely walk or bicycle, there is no environmental or health downside. Riding the bus or train helps take cars and trucks off the road, cutting down on tailpipe emissions, which account for a large percentage of air pollution in most urban areas.

Cloth v. disposable diapers.

Disposable diapers are convenient, but they can be costly over time and raise heath concerns over absorbent chemicals used to keep infants dry, such as sodium polyacrylate (SAP).

Cloth diaper services can be harmful to the environment because of both chemicals used in laundering and carbon emissions released in pick-up and delivery. However, if laundering at home, cloth diapers can be a cost-effective option.

Also efficient are all-in-one or "hybrid" diapers that usually have a washable cotton pant and a disposable diaper refill that can be flushed or used as wet compost. Organic disposable diapers offer an eco-friendly alternative to plastic, non-biodegradable ones that are left in landfills indefinitely.

Many parents use a combination of cloth and disposable diapers, depending on the circumstance and time of day.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.