advertisement

Today's Question: Who is to blame for Madoff's crimes?

Tuesday, June 30, 2009 | 6:15 p.m. CDT; updated 6:27 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Bernie Madoff was a legend on Wall Street.  His clients were prominent figures such as Steven Spielberg and Elie Wiesel.  However, the biggest Ponzi scheme in America's financial history — in which newer clients' money was used to pay longer-standing clients — was only uncovered when economic conditions deteriorated to a point where it was hard for Madoff and his associates to cover their tracks. 

Perhaps Madoff's 150-year prison sentence on Monday gave some people a sense of justice.  But many questions remain about the labyrinth of the scheme. The New York Times has reported that in the span of 20 years as a financier, Madoff's actions cost customers between $50 billion and $65 billion.

In addition, the Times said the government charged that Madoff had money transferred from his firm's London office "to purchase property and services for the personal use and benefit" of himself, his family members and his associates.

Congress castigated the Securities and Exchange Commission for not following up on complaints brought about several times by an associate of Madoff. 

But who is to blame for such a crime?  Is it government watchdogs such as the commission?  Or should the victims of the Ponzi scheme be blamed for not asking enough questions about the source of their high returns on investments?


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

John Schultz June 30, 2009 | 7:45 p.m.

Perhaps government regulation led to investors being more lax in checking out their investments? If the government is looking into these companies, why should the average investor feel the need to so?

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith July 1, 2009 | 7:17 a.m.

These situations - and has everyone forgotten the S&L crisis and bailout some years ago? - serve to remind us that fiscal and moral bankruptcy aren't confined to the private sector.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements