advertisement

GUEST COLUMN: Health care reform for the Ninth District

Tuesday, July 21, 2009 | 1:14 p.m. CDT; updated 11:03 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, May 4, 2010

As you know, in the next few weeks, there will be a lot of talk in Washington about reforming our system of health care. As the American people struggle to make ends meet, too many also live with the challenge of affording basic health care for themselves and their families. 

I believe that America’s health care system is broken and must be fixed. I understand concerns about getting and keeping affordable coverage. I believe that poor quality care is caused by overuse, misuse, waste, fraud and doctors having to practice defensive medicine. All of those things drive up health care costs.

I believe there are several common-sense things we can do to improve our health care system, and as the House continues to discuss and develop its approach to addressing health care, one thing is clear — small business owners need meaningful reform that increases access to quality, affordable health care. Sadly, many of the provisions in the Democrats’ draft bills and most recent proposal fall far short of achieving those goals. Specifically, I oppose employer mandates that threaten the viability of our nation’s job creators. An 8 percent pay-or-play mandate would inevitably harm job creation. Research by the National Federation of Independent Businesses shows an employer mandate could cost 1.6 million jobs  — hardly what this country needs in these challenging economic times. 

Recently, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) found that the Democrats’ House bill would cost a hefty $1.04 trillion and leave many Americans still uninsured. To be sure, I believe in and will continue to champion increasing access to insurance. However, in a lagging economy with a mounting unemployment rate, a trillion dollars is a lot of money to spend to leave many people still struggling to buy basic health care. Moreover, reforming health care does not mean we have to penalize businesses with more taxes. Under the Democrats’ House plan, many small businesses would be hit with a penalty equal to 8 percent of payroll if they fail to provide health insurance to workers.

As a small business owner and a member of the House Small Business Committee, I am keenly aware of the difficulties small businesses face in providing their employees with health insurance. That is why I support Small Business Health Plans to allow small businesses to pool together and increase their purchasing power so that they can provide health benefits to their employees at the same prices that are available to large corporations.

I support quality, affordable health care and believe that we should look closely at several potential health care reforms, such as making it easier to transfer care from one job to another. 

We should consider putting stronger rules and regulations on health care providers that would, among other things, require health insurers to cover pre-existing conditions. We should look at health care tax credits to ensure that hard-working folks have access to affordable health care in the first place, and in recognizing that not all high school and college graduates are able to find a job that offers health care coverage after graduation, we should consider allowing dependents to remain on their parents’ health policies up to the age of 25.  This would reduce the number of uninsured Americans by up to 7 million, according to the Congressional Research Service. 

We must also act to prevent abusive lawsuits from driving up the cost of care and driving doctors out of business. While I support health care reform, I cannot and will not support a public health care system that rations health care and allows a government bureaucrat to make life-and-death decisions when it comes to people’s health.

I have already supported legislation that provides health care coverage to low-income children.  H.R. 2 — introduced in the House on January 13, 2009, and voted on the next day — had a number of serious flaws, which led me to support a better, longer-term extension of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. I voted for a seven-year extension of SCHIP that prioritizes covering low-income children without raising taxes. The plan I voted for would not have forced children with private insurance into a government-run health care system, nor would it have spent my constituents’ hard-earned tax dollars to provide insurance for families making $80,000 per year in New York. In addition, the plan I voted for maintained the requirement in current law that prevents illegal immigrants from gaining access to taxpayer-funded programs. 

Additionally, I have signed legislation that would initiate an evidence-based public education campaign about breast cancer in women under age 40, and I opposed a recent action by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to deny Medicare coverage of computed tomography colonography screenings, also known as virtual colonoscopies. A lack of awareness and decreased access to screenings and detection undoubtedly result in a much higher mortality rate for cancer than there ought to be.

Given the health care shortages throughout the country, including many parts of my district, I have signed legislation that would improve access to health care by increasing the number of physicians trained in high-need specialties and by expanding the nation’s graduate medical education training capacity to a larger number of suburban and rural hospitals.  Rural areas continue to suffer from a lack of diverse providers for their communities’ health care needs. 

As Congress tackles these and other important issues, I will continue to work tirelessly to make sure that any reforms to our world-class health care system do not destroy the absolute right of patients to make very personal decisions on treatment with their doctors, without interference of a third party like the government. 

Although not everyone agrees on this issue, I believe that we can all agree at least on this point: Any decisions we make on health care should not be motivated by politics but, rather, by providing better care for all Americans and all Missourians.

Blaine Luetkemeyer is the U.S. House representative for the Ninth District of Missouri.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

William Monroe July 24, 2009 | 11:06 a.m.

About time we heard from our Representative on a substantive topic, no matter how off the wall he is.
"...I cannot and will not support a public health care system that rations health care and allows a government bureaucrat to make life-and-death decisions when it comes to people’s health."
Well...who would support such a thing. This is NOT what is proposed and our Rep knows it. Blaine's statement is the 9 second sound bite he has been coached to use in referencing a Public option and has nothing to do with reality.
Also...
We now know where Blaine Leuktemeyer's priorities are:
"...one thing is clear — small business owners need meaningful reform that increases access to quality, affordable health care."
I concur with this completely...but there is so much more need out there than that which applies solely to "small business owners". As a member of the insurance industry Blaine knows a lot about denying coverage due to preexisting conditions and claims to support the end of that standard insurance industry practice. This is also laudable as are some of his other, nibbling 'round the edge of the problem "solutions" he has supported. What about the 47 Million uninsured in this country? We need a public health option to compete with private insurance to bring down costs and provide coverage for folks who now have no where to turn. Every year thousands are going bankrupt due to medical expenses...bringing down small businesses along with the rest of us.
We need real solutions...not sound bites. We need him to support President Obama's efforts to bring America into the 21st Century, with a health care system equal to tht of other industrialized nations.
Bill Monroe, Fulton

(Report Comment)
Ray Shapiro July 24, 2009 | 2:17 p.m.

We need to drive down the expense of health care.
The health care industry needs to be reformed.
If you follow the money, insurance companies are the root of the problem.
Obama is not reforming the health care industry.
He is becoming an insurance salesman.
Insurance is just another bureaucracy.
Government workers push paper. Insurance companies dole out benefits, (aka entitlements). It's a perfectly understandable fit, but highly flawed.
True changes to improve health care accessibility could look something like this:
1. Eliminating health care as an insurable commodity from insurance companies. Eliminate malpractice premiums to insurance companies as this too puts a financial burden on the health care industry.
2. Shift most of the responsibility of accessibility to the AMA. The AMA, directly or through Medical Schools can work out the "malpractice" issue with their accountants and attorneys concerning "risk-management."
3. Government employees manufacturing medical supply/equipment can offset the expense of health care "accessories."
4. Government employees can manufacture most medications.
(Research and development can continue with the "inventors.")
5. The government and the AMA can work together to reduce/subsidize the schooling and certification of physicians and key medical professionals.
6. Remove the military from the management of VA hospitals. Assign these hospitals to Health and Human Services and afford accessibility to vets and the indigent.
These are just a few ideas I've made up off the top of my head. I could come up with more. So can other people. It amazes me that politicians see orchestrating an insurance industry coup as their only option. Even Republicans buckle under the influence of insurance company stockholders and board of directors. The American public is being duped by Democratic Party propaganda and blinded by Presidential charisma. Our health care system is not broken. It can be improved with some tweaking to move the "doctor" culture in the right direction.

The feds already have too much debt and overspend on everything. Their current plan will only cost the taxpayer and employers more money and heart ache.
When it comes to "reforming health care" they should be looking outside the insurance box and focus on the psyche of doctors, nurses, medical technicians, counselors and physical therapists and patients more so then on their own agenda for an all encompassing bureaucracy.
Obama is wrong on this one.
His ego, and the power crazed efforts of other political left liberal progressives, prevents him from seeing anything but that agenda.
Insurance czar should not be part of that agenda.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements