advertisement

Local readers should not be left unaware of state events

Thursday, August 20, 2009 | 12:01 a.m. CDT; updated 1:27 p.m. CDT, Thursday, August 20, 2009

Sunday’s Columbia papers ran stories that had nothing to do with the citizens of central Missouri and, I believe, seem to be only fillers in our two papers. Yes, the Missourian is now calling itself “hyper-local,” which may be why I cannot get a copy outside of city limits. The Tribune seems to think about the news, but I usually buy the Post-Dispatch for business and political news in Missouri.

There were two stories concerning this state that were not reported in either paper.

The first I found on AOL News, which in turn lead me to the Aspen Daily News. Sprint vice president of corporate brand marketing Tom Murphy, 45 of Kansas City, was killed when according to AOL News a “boulder the size of a cooler” hit his car. The accident happened on Colorado State Highway 82 between Aspen and Glenwood Springs, about one mile north of Snowmass Canyon. Murphy and his family were starting their trip home after vacationing in Aspen.

Troy Hooper, editor and writer for the Aspen Daily News told me in a telephone interview that the story was picked up by the Associated Press. A quick search found the story in more than 30 newspapers and television stations outside of Colorado and KC. However, the Missourian and the Tribune did not run the story.

Why is this story important to those living in the middle of Middle America? First, a large number of us also take vacations in Colorado or Utah. We drive from the Show-Me State or rent a car in Denver or Colorado Springs to drive into the hills. Most drive as if they were in central Missouri on I-70 cruising toward their destination. After 25 years, five months and 22 days living in Denver, I can say that you must be very aware of the “Falling Rocks” signs on Colorado highways.

Second, Murphy’s death will affect Sprint PCS, a Kansas City metro business and its customers in central Missouri. This is a local issue.

The second story was in Sunday’s St. Louis Post-Dispatch, front page above the fold. State Sen. Jeff Smith, D-St. Louis, was apparently under federal investigation concerning his 2004 campaign for U.S. Congress. The complaint, filed by then candidate and now Rep. Russ Carnahan, involved a flier that contained “false and malicious information intended to deceive potential voters and evade proper federal disclosures,” according to the Post-Dispatch. The investigation was closed due to the lack of evidence and the investigation of another man.

The story also reported that rumors that Smith was a target in a voter fraud case are not true, according to the FBI.

Now Smith is discussing leaving the senate mid-term.

Columbians were left blissfully ignorant of the situation.

My regular readers know my disdain for how Missouri legislators conduct their business. The contention between the Republicans and Democrats is like watching the Hatfields and McCoys in a face off across the Big Sandy River. It is a good thing that weapons are not allowed under the Gray Dome.

This story has more to do with ethics in Missouri’s – and by extension the United States’ – political arena. I am not advocating that our elected and appointed officials live in a glass house and maintain a cloistered life of purity. Political fights, however, should be more than an unruly feud but more like a Golden Gloves boxing match. No punching below the belt, no “rabbit punches,” break when the referee says break, no cheating or lying and shake hands before and after the match. To maintain a true representative democracy, cooperation is key.

Our newspapers are small. Too many believe they are not worth the price of admission. The Internet, television and radio have the advantage. However, the newspaper allows for a deeper investigation of a story, allows for a diversity of opinion and provides the reasoning why these stories are important to their readers. At least they should.

As readers, you need to demand that our papers report on those stories that deal with central Missouri. Stories concerning local, state and federal politics. About local, state and national business how these stories affect central Missouri. Isn’t that what a newspaper is meant to do?

 

David Rosman is an award winning editor, writer, professional speaker and college instructor in communications, ethics, business and politics. He welcomes your comments at ProfDave1011@netscape.net.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

tina fey August 21, 2009 | 7:43 a.m.

Hey Dave, the clue phone is ringing and there is a message for you: The Columbia Missourian is not a 'newspaper'. It is a student-run, college-themed journalistic experiment supported by federal and state funds and coordinated by liberal junkies (George Kennedy, Tom Warhover, you, et al.) who could never create a profit-driven news business model. Serious intellectuals do not read the Missourian. (I only do to keep tabs on the disaffected, wacko liberal drop outs who wield their mighty pens and their Walter Mitty dream scape. Some of us reach for the stars, Dave, some of us settle for Columbia College). You non-student adults who are responsible for 'newspaper' content could never produce a 'newspaper' because you carry extreme left-wing political bias that is out of sync with mainstream political thought. Furthermore, your 'outsider' position and attitudes only produce scorn from local readers. So Dave, pick up that clue phone, and reach for the stars.

(Report Comment)
Daniel Jordan Jordan August 21, 2009 | 6:41 p.m.

Wow, tina, that was a really nice thing to say.

Do I correctly understand your position to be that Mr. Rosman should not contribute to the Missourian?

If so is that because of the paper's standards, his opinions, or both?

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr August 21, 2009 | 7:02 p.m.

Too bad Tina does not have the guts to use their real name isn't it?

(Report Comment)
Daniel Jordan August 21, 2009 | 7:19 p.m.

Charles Dudley Jr., I entirely agree.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr August 22, 2009 | 4:41 a.m.

>>> When you post, please use your actual name. <<<

(Report Comment)
John Schultz August 22, 2009 | 12:26 p.m.

How do we or the Missourian know you are really Charles Dudley, Jr? Get over it and let the Missourian deal with it if they wish. You have your own forum to run if you want to be an administrator.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr August 22, 2009 | 12:55 p.m.

John Schultz how do we know you are the real John Schultz?

If you do not like my posts just do not read them. :)

(Report Comment)
John Schultz August 22, 2009 | 3:23 p.m.

You missed my point, but got it unconsciously with your last sentence. If you don't like "tina fey"'s posts or "Ayn Rand"'s posts, don't read them and don't whine about them being pseudonymous.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr August 22, 2009 | 3:42 p.m.

John Schultz you miss the point as in if these anon posters really want themselves acknowledged why not use your real name for some creditability. It is too easy for them to blow their hot air behind a fake name instead of standing up and be counted by using their real name.

Then again maybe they are radical Libertarian whack jobs and in that case who cannot blame them for not wearing a bag over their heads or in this case using a anon name. :)

(Report Comment)
John Schultz August 22, 2009 | 4:13 p.m.

Chuck, I didn't miss your point in whining about "tina fey." Maybe you should investigate pseudonyms (you do know that some of the Founding Fathers published papers in such a manner before the American Revolution, don't you?) and reputation-based markets. Even if Ayn Rand, for example, is not known to me, the fact that he or she uses the same name for every post here lets me assign their posts a level of competency and respect, much like I do to your posts. If you want to whine about the people who are using obvious fake names, contact the Missourian and rant at them directly. I don't think anyone else is as concerned about a couple people posting comments on the Internet. Stop being exclusive.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr August 22, 2009 | 5:38 p.m.

John Schultz it is their rules I was pointing to not my own. Get over yourself dude.

The Missourian staff read over all of these comments whether you might think so or not. I heard that each prolific poster here has a sort of pseudo cult following.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz August 22, 2009 | 8:45 p.m.

If the Missourian staff read all the comments, why do you need to harp on people? Is it because they posted something you disagree with? Let the staff deal with it.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr August 22, 2009 | 9:32 p.m.

John Schultz cry more.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements