Today's Question: Should the city cut back on social services funding?

Tuesday, September 8, 2009 | 8:33 a.m. CDT; updated 9:27 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, September 8, 2009

COLUMBIA – News of the city's potential budget cuts reported Sept. 2 in the Missourian was representative of a fundamental economic frustration.

At a time when more people need increased financial assistance from charities and other outlets, people naturally have less money available to donate to those groups.

The city has also had to make some difficult choices regarding social services. A quick look at the Missourian report explains the details.

Last year, the city set aside just over $900,000 for social service groups. The city wants to save $2 million in the next year, so trims must be made in the budget. A 5% cut in social service funding, the most drastic of the three proposals mentioned in the article, would mean a loss of approximately $45,000 for social services.

Steve Hollis, Columbia's Office of Community Services manager, explained in the article that most cities do not use general funds to take care of social services.

But the city's budget shows the general fund will suffer significant cuts. It's important to consider social services is not the only area where cuts would be made. In fact, the city's 2010 budget includes cuts in multiple city departments.

At an Aug. 17 City Council meeting, some residents expressed dismay that social services were being cut, noting that in recent years they have usually increased or at least stayed consistent. The city's Budget-In-Brief explains that revenues from the Enterprise Fund, which will see a spending increase in 2010, cannot be transferred into other areas.

Are there better ways for Columbia to save money in 2010 than to cut social services funding, or is a cut simply a byproduct of a bad economy that every department must expect?

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Phil Wilkinson September 10, 2009 | 3:29 a.m.

Stop spending money on stupid stuff!! Sidewalks to nowhere...artwork/statues that no one cares about... bicycle lanes, (look left, look right, use a mirror and stay off the phone and if someone yells BOO at you...Yell BOO back!)...Drugs-for-less park...just to name a few.
Social Services should be used for the needy. But, being qualified to receive these services does not mean that you are "In need".

(Report Comment)
Tim Donahoe September 10, 2009 | 3:43 a.m.

Bicycle lanes were/are paid for by the federal funding Columbia recieved as a test community for a nationwide non-motorized transportation program. Don't complain about the bike lanes, as they are not much more than car parking lanes on most streets that aren't say Grindstone or the like. Why the city would put in bike lanes, then allow people to park there is beyond me.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr September 10, 2009 | 4:12 a.m.

>>> Sidewalks to nowhere <<<

Sorry pal this is not Alaska by far.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.