Analysis: Obama foes contrived speech controversy to hassle president

Wednesday, September 9, 2009 | 12:40 p.m. CDT

CHAPEL HILL, N.C. — There may be a lesson plan for grown-ups in the contrived controversy about Barack Obama's back-to-school pep talk to students. It would be to do your homework, just as the president told the pupils.

That way, the people who protested the Obama speech before they knew what was in it would have realized there is nothing unusual about a president appearing at a public school as the classroom year begins. The previous three Republicans have and there wasn't any stir, aside from some Democratic nitpicking about White House expenses, proving that neither party has a monopoly on pettiness. It was routine. As, in the end, Obama's Tuesday talk was.

Then again, many people doing the complaining, and certainly the broadcast talkers and anti-Obama bloggers who fomented the whole business, were not looking for information or for reasons not to make a fuss. They wanted one, and got it.

At least some of the complainants presumably took advantage of the White House's early release of Obama's text, 24 hours in advance, so they could read what he was going to say and make sure it wasn't offensive.

And one formerly outraged Republican, Florida state GOP chairman Jim Greer, who had said the president was trying to promote socialist ideology, relented after reading the text and said it was appropriate. Although he also was quoted as wondering whether Obama would really give the same speech.

Of course he did, urging students in his televised talk at an Arlington, Va., high school to study, work hard and stick to it, all the things a president would be expected to say in such a setting.

"I expect you to get serious this year," the president said. "I expect you to put your best effort into everything you do. I expect great things from each of you.

"So don't let us down — don't let your family or your country or yourself down. Make us all proud. I know you can do it."

There was no count of his student audience; millions, presumably, despite the schools and school districts that did not show the speech because of parent protests, which were most vehement in Republican areas.

It was an invented and inflated controversy in which the administration provided its foes an easy target by issuing a proposed lesson plan in which students would have been asked to help the president meet his goals. That was revised to ask pupils to write letters about their own goals and how they would try to achieve them.

There were no Republican complaints in 1991 when President George H.W. Bush spoke at a Washington, D.C., school and told the students, "Write me a letter — I'm serious about this one — write me a letter about ways you can help us achieve our goals."

Nor did Republicans claim that Ronald Reagan was trying to create a cult of personality, as some did this time, when he spoke to students at the White House in 1988, near the end of his second term. Answering questions, Reagan boasted of economic progress and a patriotic revival under his administration. He also said he opposed rigid gun controls or handgun bans.

More politics there than in Obama's school session. At a meeting with students before his speech, the president did tell a questioning youth that he favors universal health insurance and thinks it can be done. But he never mentioned his policy agenda in his speech.

President George W. Bush was at a Sarasota, Fla., school reading to pupils on Sept. 11, 2001. He was to have delivered a back-to-school talk there, but never did. The terrorist attacks on New York City and Washington intervened.

Until now presidential school speeches hadn't been treated as anything out of the ordinary. Obama's wasn't either, but right-wing activists saw an opportunity to hassle him and to stir up people who don't like the president by inventing an issue.

This wasn't really about the propriety of a president speaking at a school or about what he might say that parents claimed they had to guard their kids against. It was about opposing Obama. There's nothing wrong with opposition. That's the way politics works.

But the underlying tone of the most vehement critics goes past the traditions of politics to the idea that schoolchildren shouldn't be listening to this guy because he shouldn't be president.

The office, whoever the man in the White House, always has commanded respect. That is eroding in the era of nonstop talk shows and angry blogs.

It has been an American tradition for losing candidates in presidential elections to urge their followers to respect the outcome, to say that the winner is their president, too. Episodes like the school speech flap say something different.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Ray Shapiro September 9, 2009 | 1:32 p.m.

(...right-wing activists saw an opportunity to hassle him and to stir up people who don't like the president by inventing an issue.")
I say thank you "right-wing activists" for being such good watchdogs.
Considering how "czars," such as Van Jones get appointed to powerful positions, "under the radar," in this new administration, I appreciate those who choose not to behave as rubber stamping bureaucrats and facilitate independent thinking as we separate the wheat from the chaff.
Nowadays, a good rule of thumb...Question everything.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr September 9, 2009 | 2:35 p.m.

It is too bad though on this "Cry Of Wolf" by the GOP koolaid drinking drones back fired right into their own faces and showed the entire nation how petty they can actually be.

I will bet anybody a dollar that if this was a White Democrat President this would not have been an issue to the GOP and it's koolaid drinking drones.

Sad but completely and totally undeniably politically correct in our society.

Anybody wanna lose a dollar?

(Report Comment)
John Schultz September 9, 2009 | 2:42 p.m.

And Chuck pulls the race card, yet again...

(Report Comment)
Gregg Bush September 9, 2009 | 2:45 p.m.

Clearly, whatever is said by the first African-American President can no way be a teaching moment for America's youth or America's parents. Clearly, this is the most brazen attempt of undermining in our Constitution and circumventing parental responsibility for educating out nation's youth. The only reasonable reaction must be suspicion since nothing good can come of this scalawag (look up the definition)! My children are too impressionable to hear anything except what I desire to tell them. My children are too weak to fend off the dastardly wiles of this charlatan, and my credibility is too low with my own children that I will be unable to convince them to differentiate the skulduggery of the President with the gospel. Indoctrination is mine alone.

(Report Comment)
Ray Shapiro September 9, 2009 | 2:58 p.m.

@Greg Bush:
This country has three camps.
Those who are busy calling one camp, "racist bigots" and the other camp viewing and reacting to "hero-worship."
Then there's everyone else.
Which are you?

(Report Comment)
Gregg Bush September 9, 2009 | 3:18 p.m.

Two studies come to mind from the Education Research Information Center.

(Report Comment)
Charles Dudley Jr September 9, 2009 | 4:34 p.m.

>>> John Schultz September 9, 2009 | 2:42 p.m.
And Chuck pulls the race card, yet again... <<<

Truth hurts doesn't it John when it gets turned right back onto those who first point the finger.

No John I am not talking about you at all but about the GOP koolaid drinking crowd who want Obama to fail at all costs.

Even to the point of their own reputations.

(Report Comment)
Douglas Schell September 10, 2009 | 7:53 a.m.

FYI, I spent 30 years as a University Business Professor so I'm glad to see someone set up this type of dialogue.

Although I would like to see Obama the usurper out of office, I agree that the "speach controversy" was "much to do about nothing." When I heard the wild accusations about a POTUS NOT doing this type of thing before, I thought about Bush being in a classroom with children I believe in Florida when 911 occured.

I beleive the most serious thing about Obama related to our children is his apparent agreement with his own appointed Dr. Ezekial Emanuel and two othewr medical advisors who are active members in the world depopulation movement through rationing of health care to the very young and very old.

I'm concerned that the Obama
administation seems unconcerned that the swine flu was developed in a lab rather than being a natural mutation in nature.

I'm concerned that the swine flu shots are highly dangerous so much so that many nurses and MDs in England are refusing to take them and several of the scientists who were involved in the development of the shots are refusing to take them.

I'm concenred that biochemical warfare has already been declared in Maine and MASS where everyone will be forced to take the shots.

All I've said can easily be verified but NOT if one is an Obama cultist.

I say to the anti-Obama people (NOT racists), pick really important things to get concerned about

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.