advertisement

Collapse came quickly for Missouri football team

Friday, October 9, 2009 | 6:34 p.m. CDT; updated 6:45 p.m. CDT, Friday, October 9, 2009

COLUMBIA — It was like a heavyweight fight.

But not in the way these things sometimes are. This wasn't an epic battle between two great champions. This wasn't Muhammad Ali and Joe Frazier.

This was everything changing in a flash. This was one side standing one moment, and waking up on the canvas the next.

"It's like you get hit in the mouth once and you're kind of dazed," Tigers defensive lineman Jaron Baston said. "You get hit again, and the next thing you know you're knocked out. You don't realize it coming."

After three quarters of dominance by the Missouri defense, it took only two minutes and 58 seconds to put the Tigers down for the night. And among all the lessons that Missouri will try to take from its conference-opening 27-12 loss to Nebraska, one stands above the rest. Against quality competition when a team loses its focus, even for a moment, when it rains, it can pour.

When the fourth quarter began Nebraska quarterback Zac Lee had completed nine of his 27 pass attempts for a measly 79 yards. Roy Helu Jr., the centerpiece of the fearsome Nebraska running game, had carried the ball 11 times for just 25 yards. The Tigers' 12-point lead might as well have been five times that.

Both Baston and linebacker Andrew Gachkar said the unit was on cloud nine. Asked whether or not he thought the Tigers had rattled the Cornhuskers, Gachkar responded without hesitation.

"I think for the first three quarters we were in all their heads," Gachkar said.

Just after the fourth quarter began, it looked as if the Tigers were going to force yet another Nebraska punt. It was third-and-8 and the Cornhuskers had the ball on their own 44-yard line. Lee dropped back to pass. And as Missouri safety Jasper Simmons moved forward to defend a shorter route in the middle of the field, Nebraska wide receiver Niles Paul sprinted behind the Tigers' defense and hauled in an easy 56-yard touchdown pass.

Nebraska had finally broken through, but to Baston the play was still just a tiny crack in a previously impenetrable shell.

"Most definitely," said Baston about whether or not the team retained the confidence it brought into the quarter after the touchdown. "We were winning the game. There was no need to feel like, 'Oh here we go.'"

But sometimes a tiny crack is all something needs to shatter.

On the ensuing play Blaine Gabbert was intercepted by Nebraska defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh, and the Missouri defense trotted back onto the field with only 18 yards between the Cornhuskers and another touchdown. Two plays later Lee lobbed a pass into the end zone that managed to make its way between two Tiger defenders before being cradled by Paul for another score. A lead that felt like it was out of reach was gone.

"It's a tough feeling when you're out there playing great ball for three quarters, putting up nice numbers, best we've been playing this year, and all of a sudden it goes away," linebacker Sean Weatherspoon said.

Another sequence of Missouri interception and Nebraska touchdown followed. By then it didn't feel like a surprise. Control had shifted, and it had shifted faster than anyone on the Missouri sideline could have envisioned. And with that quickness comes the question.

How?

How does a defense that looked unstoppable for 45 minutes fall apart in an instant?

The answer?

The Missouri defense is just as imperfect as the individuals that constitute it.

As the people in the stands, in the pressbox and in front of their TV's felt the invincibility of the Missouri defense, so too did the people that form it. When dealing with human beings sometimes complacency is inescapable.

"We call it the human element," Gachkar said. "You look at the scoreboard and you're thinking, 'We got this game in the bag.' And obviously, we didn't."

As quick as Gachkar was to acknowledge the lapse in focus, he was even quicker in harping on the need to learn from it. Cornerback Trey Hobson agreed. The most important thing now is not that they made the mistakes. It's making sure they never happen again.

"When you're up like that in a big game on national television, we've just got to hold our water and stay focused the whole game," Hobson said.  "We've got to stay focused the whole game. Never get comfortable. I think we learned our lesson."

 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Bill Galvin October 10, 2009 | 2:12 a.m.

Missouri's defense needs to grow a pair....all I've heard from their camp since the 4th qaurter visit behind the woodshed, is "I was stunned", we we're dazed when they scored",WTF!!!!.....if they keep that attitude and lay down in front of good teams they should plan on losing a lot.In any case the best team won and MU's upset bid was thwarted.

(Report Comment)
mark hurst October 10, 2009 | 9:59 a.m.

well, there were some defensive lapses...BUT, the majority of the blame should go to the Offense...we were given "gifts" inside the HUSKER 30 numerous times, and failed to convert...in fact, we only got a single field goal from these turnovers etc...You can't convert 3 pts. and expect to keep Nebraska at bay, and Jake Harry did his part by planting the FUSKERS on their heels. I will say, in spite of our improved young and quick DE's, we still don't seem to put much pressure on the QB...how many sacks?
Yes, jasper and Co. blew coverage...do we blame coaching and steck? Should we Blame Gary P.? Still stubborn...maybe Gabbert sghouldn't have been playing 2nd half, injured, ineffective. But we got beat in the trenches, running game and BOTH LINES, failed to punch it in offensively...true, our D did give out in the 4th. Our WR/passing game and especially our running game were subpar, and that's putting it nicely. There's still hope, but once again, the Tigers failed on a national stage on ESPN with a chance to "show" the country...oh, we showed em!!! Still, Go Tigers!!! Mark, Dallas

(Report Comment)
chad d October 10, 2009 | 11:17 a.m.

I don't want to take away too much from Mizzery's defense, because you guys played way better than expected and ultimately very well throughout the game. As a Husker, I was impressed and felt that your defense was thwarting our gameplan. That being said, the Husker offense was performing terribly, particularly at QB. Get Zach to throw only half of his bad balls on target and we're making big passing plays, and therefore you guys aren't stuffing the box anymore and cutting down the run game. People here in Nebraska were quick to vilify Watson (indeed, I was one of them), but if just half those passes are catchable the first three quarters are an entirely different ballgame.

I also thought the Husker D was very stout. We were getting great penetration with a 4-man rush all night, which allowed us to cover your receivers better and shut down your game. Gabbert may have been hurt, but at least he wasn't throwing five feet over receivers heads. He was making catchable passes. But he was always in a hurry.

In the end, the Husker D dominated all game, and the Husker offense underachieved all game. That's the only reason it was even close. Sorry, Mizzou, but I think most people looking at this realistically will see the same thing.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements