advertisement

Republicans criticize Nixon on tax raises, budget

Thursday, January 21, 2010 | 12:01 a.m. CST; updated 8:49 p.m. CST, Tuesday, February 23, 2010

JEFFERSON CITY — A deep partisan divide emerged Wednesday night following Gov. Jay Nixon's State of the State address to a joint session of Missouri's legislature.

While Nixon praised his administration's efforts to manage the state's budget shortfall, his address was followed by a blistering attack by Republican Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder. Some of the initiatives Nixon focused on heavily, such as the curbing of payday loans and the cutting of business taxes to spur growth, were either dismissed or harshly criticized by Kinder and House Republican leaders.

In a televised address after Nixon's address, Kinder accused Nixon's administration of enticing some legislators with offers to work in his administration in exchange for votes on certain bills. Kinder also accused Nixon's administration of breaking the promise the governor made Wednesday to not raise taxes and also claimed that he "cooked the books" to make the 2010 budget.

"Last year, the governor refused to consult with us," Kinder said. "He borrowed money from the state's rainy day fund, shuffled money in closed door meetings and 'cooked the books' with Wall Street-style accounting."

Kinder, who has served in his position since 2005 and is the only Republican statewide office holder, has delivered the Republican rebuttal to both of Nixon's State of the State speeches. Seizing on the growing national unpopularity with President Barack Obama's proposed policies, Kinder devoted a large portion of the response to criticizing the health-care reform bills being debated in Washington and the federal stimulus plan.

While the Republicans took shots at Nixon, the governor's speech took full advantage of the theatrical power inherent with State of the State addresses.

Speaking to an overflow crowd from the dais of the House Speaker, Nixon brought in Missourians as visual assistance to promote a diverse array of initiatives: the CEO who moved his company from San Diego because of lower taxes and the Ray family in St. Louis who gave him the opportunity to promote a continued freeze in higher-education tuition.

He said these initiatives would require bi-partisanship, especially because the Republicans control both the House and Senate.

"In everything we do this year, we must put our differences aside and put Missouri first," Nixon said. "Our most pressing economic challenges ... are too important to be sidetracked by partisan bickering."

Rep. Allen Icet, R-St. Louis County, who chairs the House Budget Committee, said last year's budget negotiations were dominated by the administration, and fellow Republicans also criticized Nixon for only issuing his 2010 budget right before the address was delivered, not giving the legislators a chance to look at it.

"If we had bipartisanship, it would make my life much easier," Icet said. "I would not characterize what happened last year as bipartisanship."

While Sen. Frank Barnitz, D-Lake Spring, was unhappy with the Republican response, he was most upset with the accusation that Nixon's administration used misleading accounting techniques to balance the budget. He said the state's Constitution has been amended in such a way that book-cooking could not occur and equated Kinder's speech to one that would be heard during a campaign, not as an official party response.

"I think the Republican response was that he (Nixon) had 'dismantled' the budget or broken the budget," Barnitz said. "You can't dismantle our budget because of previous things with the Constitution. I don't think anything they threw out there was anything other than a partisan way of trying to divide. I found it to be very combative."

Kinder accused Nixon's acceptance of stimulus funds as a reason why unemployment has risen in 2009 and used the salaries of Nixon's staff as a mechanism to portray the governor as out-of-touch with the financial problems of many Missourians.

After asking for a cut in salaries for 2009, Nixon's administration asked for an increase this year. Nixon currently has five members of his staff making over $100,000 annually, compared with two in the final year of former Gov. Matt Blunt's one term in office.

State Budget Director Linda Luebbering said the salary increase was necessary given the increased burden Nixon's staff has in facing what she last year called the "worst economic conditions in our lifetimes."

She said the problems facing Missouri were based on global factors and not an indication that Nixon's policies were detrimental.

"All states are facing difficult budget times," Luebbering said. "The governor's office took cuts last year. It needs more resources to manage difficult times."

After several requests, the governor's office was unavailable to comment on the accusations Wednesday night.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements