Parties band together to call for balanced federal budget

Friday, January 22, 2010 | 12:00 a.m. CST; updated 9:41 a.m. CDT, Monday, April 26, 2010

JEFFERSON CITY — Two state legislators have filed a resolution calling for lawmakers in Congress to pass a constitutional amendment forcing the federal government to balance the budget.

This bipartisan effort from the parties' leading House Budget Committee members follows Republican Lt. Gov. Peter Kinder's scathing criticism of the Democratic governor Wednesday night after the State of the State address.

The representatives, Allen Icet, R-St. Louis County, and Chris Kelly, D-Columbia, said government spending in Washington is out of control and dangerous.

"Rep. Kelly and I both know there are implications to the state when the federal government spends like drunken sailors," Icet said.

Kelly said balancing the budget is an issue important to everyone and goes beyond party politics.

"Why does one's party matter to that? Why is that a relevant consideration?" Kelly asked.

Kelly blames the past and current presidential administrations for abusive spending habits.

"President George Bush drove up the budget ceiling and President (Barack) Obama is not dealing efficiently with the deficit," Kelly said. "This is a bipartisan scandal in the United States, and we bipartisanly ought to fix it."

While the Republican Party is not blameless, the majority of the problems come from the Democratic agenda in the White House and Congress, Icet said.

Kelly said two things worry him the most about the current administration's spending. Not only does the deficit spending take money out of the economy, but the current spending habits in Washington might give more power to the federal government, he said.

"The federal government's power can grow exponentially if they don't have to be responsible about the spending," Kelly said.

In 1983, the Missouri House had passed a similar resolution to the one filed by Kelly and Icet. The resolution called for a constitutional convention to ratify the Constitution for a federal balanced budget. Kelly voted for the resolution in 1983.

No action has been done with the passed resolution since the 1983 vote in the House, and Kelly said the call for action needed renewal during the current economic climate. Both the Missouri House and Senate passed the resolution in 1983. The resolution only sends a message to Congress on the General Assembly's opinion; it does not enact law.

Other states have either passed or are working on resolutions calling for a balanced federal budget to send to Congress , Kelly said.

Icet said he hopes Congress looks at stringent state laws as examples for a constitutional amendment. The Missouri Constitution requires the governor to submit a budget to the Missouri General Assembly within thirty days of the beginning of a regular session. Gov. Jay Nixon presented the General Assembly with the budget Wednesday night.

If Congress were to pass a proposed federal budget amendment, it would go to the states for ratification. Three-fourths of the states would have to approve the proposed amendment before the amendment would pass. Kelly said two more states would have to send resolutions to Congress before it could consider such an amendment.

The support for the resolution should be unanimous in the General Assembly, Icet said.

"Telling people we don't have the money to do everything isn't pleasant," Icet said. "But it's obvious to me that it makes simple sense that the federal government requires a balanced budget."


Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Bill Walker January 22, 2010 | 5:05 p.m.

The author mixes up the two methods whereby amendments may be proposed to the Constitution, by Congress and by an Article V Convention. The reference to the 1983 application refer to applications for an Article V Convention call.

The Congressional Record shows that all 50 states have submitted 750 applications for an Article V Convention call. Under the terms of Article V Congress must call a convention if 34 states submit 34 applications. Congress has thus far refused to obey the Constitution and call the convention. The texts of the applications can be read at

If you examine the record you'll find the information regarding the number of applications for a balanced budget amendment to be incorrect. The record shows 39 states have submitted such applications.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.