$800 million bond measure in Missouri House likely tabled

Friday, February 19, 2010 | 9:55 p.m. CST; updated 11:55 a.m. CST, Monday, February 22, 2010

COLUMBIA – A proposed $800 million bond issue to fund construction and maintenance of state higher education buildings has run into trouble in the House and is likely to be tabled before it reaches the Senate.

House Speaker Ron Richard, R-Joplin, said Thursday he doesn’t plan to assign a committee to consider the measure. Richard said he has concerns about the additional amount of debt the state would take on and how that would affect the state’s AAA bond rating, which the highest possible rating.

The bond issue was proposed by Rep. Chris Kelly, D-Columbia.

Richard was one of the 131 House members that easily passed Kelly’s previous bond proposal in a 131-28 vote last April. That proposal made it to the Senate last year before being tabled because of similar financial concerns by state legislators.

“The question is one for the voters of the state to decide,” Kelly said. “I don’t understand why these people won’t allow for a vote. It is important for the House to let the voters decide what they want to do with their money.”

Kelly said the bond proposal isn’t big enough to hurt the state’s AAA rating, and the concern of the credit rating is being used as a “red herring,” a tactic to distract from the issue at hand.

Senate President Pro Tem Charlie Shields, R-Kansas City, and House Minority Leader Paul LeVota, D-Independence, also supported Richard’s stance.

When speaking of LeVota’s support for tabling of the measure, Kelly said LeVota’s stance doesn’t match the needs of LeVota’s and Shields’ constituents, which includes the University of Missouri-Kansas City’s need for a new medical building.

In a report conducted by the Missouri Department of Higher Education last summer, the department said the medical school on the Hospital Hill Campus stood out as one of the buildings most in need of renovation, repair or replacement at UMKC.

“All of the state’s universities and business community will have to convince the Republican caucus to let the issue be voted on instead of killing it,” Kelly said.

The bond proposal has received support from the state’s higher education community, including the University of Missouri System.

In a statement Thursday night, UM System President Gary Forsee said the UM System continues to advocate and support bonding legislation.

“The state has a high AAA credit rating that we should leverage, and its current 35-year bond issue is about to expire. As the state and national economy improve ever so slightly, there is no better time for the state to move forward with this being part of our important economic recovery agenda.”

With interest rates currently low and the hunger for work displayed by construction workers and Missourians in general, Paul Wagner, deputy commissioner of the state’s higher education department, said this is a good time to invest in higher education.

“The state is never going to have the cash to fund these projects and it is always going to have to borrow to make major capital improvements,” Wagner said.

Wagner said with the stance taken by Richard, capital improvement needs for the state’s colleges and universities will be neglected for another year.

Kelly said he remains hopeful that the bond issue will get through the House.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Chris Hill February 19, 2010 | 10:16 p.m.

So, how much is Missouri's pension system under-funded anyway?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.