COLUMN: Seating location of city manager symbolic of larger issue

Thursday, March 4, 2010 | 10:44 a.m. CST; updated 10:35 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, May 12, 2010

It was a small item on Monday’s City Council agenda, and council members promptly passed the buck to the mayor, who was absent.

I dredge up the seemingly insignificant question of where the city manager sits during council meetings because it seems to me – and, I’m pretty sure, to more than one council member – symptomatic of a bigger, more important issue that hasn’t gotten the public discussion it deserves so far in campaign season.


Related Media

Related Articles

That issue is the proper relationship between the manager, who is hired to administer our city government, and the council, which we elect to set policies for the manager to administer.

The bigger issue was raised last year by Third Ward Councilman Karl Skala, first when he wanted to advise City Manager Bill Watkins on the hiring of a new police chief and again when he suggested that council members should have “advise and consent” authority in the hiring of all department heads. Karl got slapped around a bit by some colleagues and the commentariat and shut up, at least temporarily.

Then last month he raised the smaller issue. Ken Green, bibliophile, newspaper reader and all-around good citizen, chimed in. The Missourian report quoted him: “Why does our City Council give our manager a seat, and dead center to boot? The city manager works for the council, which in turn works for the citizens of Columbia.”

Ken accurately summarized the theory of the council-manager form of government. His question went to the reality of it. The reality is that the manager typically sets not only the agenda for council meetings but the agenda for city government itself. There’s nothing new about that. His critics, of whom I occasionally was one, complained of Ray Beck’s dominance. It’s true that Ray was an uncommonly effective and dedicated leader. These days, his successor is playing the same role, if less overtly.

How could it be otherwise? Knowledge is power, and the manager has a huge built-in knowledge advantage over his putative bosses. He and his staff draw up the budget, the blueprint for government action. He and his staff suggest how the council should decide most of the major questions. It is, after all, his staff.

Council members, while they do hear from constituents and while some of them do undertake individual fact-finding, know mostly what the manager tells them about most issues. They’re not even supposed to question the manager’s staff except through him. They have no independent staff and no budget to hire one. That’s why the idea of student interns appeals.

Mayoral candidates Jerry Wade and Sid Sullivan have both raised in their campaign literature this problem of dependence. When Karl brought it up, though, Jerry joined the decision to table. Maybe he thought the time wasn’t right.

As outgoing Mayor Darwin Hindman ponders the placement of Bill Watkins’ nameplate, he may find the Columbia School Board’s action instructive. After Ken Green questioned the centrality of the superintendent at board meetings, Chris Belcher was displaced from the middle of the table.

My impression is that activist School Board members, unhampered by a restrictive charter, also are getting more closely involved than their City Council counterparts.

Reasonable people will disagree about the proper relationship between elected officials and hired professionals. As a small “d” democrat, I’d put the question this way: Do we want to be governed by the leaders we choose or by the administrators they select?

However you answer that question, I suspect you agree that the candidates for City Council and School Board should explain their views before we vote in April.

George Kennedy is a former managing editor at the Missourian and professor emeritus at the Missouri School of Journalism.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Mike Martin March 4, 2010 | 1:45 p.m.

Excellent column! It's always a good thing when the august man of local letters weighs in on issues like this.

I have no problem with city manager Bill Watkins sitting WITH the city council, just not at the center of the table.

Mr. Watkins is an unelected chief executive who makes roughly $150,000/yearly and whose presence is both potent and powerful.

But he is a manager, not a leader, so why does he sit where the leader of the city -- the mayor -- should sit?

Recall what Ken Green said about this same issue when the school board faced it:

"Why does our board give the superintendent a seat at its own table at public meetings - and dead-center to boot?

"Symbolically and functionally, this seating arrangement puts the superintendent on the same level as the school board. But these two governors of Columbia Public Schools occupy very different positions. The superintendent works FOR the school board, which in turn works for the residents of Columbia."

From: School board needs to show who’s the boss

Supt. Belcher wisely stepped out of the center seat:

Belcher gets a new view on meetings
Resident’s idea sparks school board seat swap.

Finally, I also addressed this issue:

"Separation of powers is a defining principle of American democracy. Our city's executive branch—the city manager and his staff—should be better separated from the legislative branch: the mayor and the city council.

"Putting the executive and legislative branches together may seem like cooperative politics, but a presiding executive with potent personal and legal authority can drive discussion and overwhelm dissent, especially among part-time volunteer legislators."

City government needs separation of powers

Mayor Darwin, before he goes, should take that center seat, and pass it to his successor.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.