Senate work groups discuss budget cuts suggestions

Tuesday, March 23, 2010 | 9:05 p.m. CDT

JEFFERSON CITY — In the face of a statewide budget crisis, Missouri senators spent much of Tuesday gathered in small work sessions to have what Sen. Jason Crowell, R-Cape Girardeau, called "one of the most fascinating and intensely honest discussions this government needs to have."

Eight groups met to review more than 1,500 e-mailed suggestions from Missourians on how to cut the budget. They were reviewed alongside suggestions from legislators and agency officials, some of which are already proposed as legislation.

Senate President Pro Tem Charlie Shields, R-St. Joseph, said the process was an informal method of seeking budget solutions with more "give-and-take" between legislators and agency officials than is normally seen in committee hearings.


Four senators sifted through 103 constituent e-mails and talked to education officials.

Many e-mails suggested downsizing the bureaucracy within the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and government in general.

Sen. Gary Nodler, R-Joplin, said he thought a quotation from an old colleague would summarize his view on overgrown bureaucracies: "Bureaucrats are like cockroaches: it's not what they consume; it's what they get into or mess up."

The downsizing ideas come in light of Gov. Jay Nixon's recommendation to combine the K-12 education department and the Department of Higher Education. Jeff Harris, Nixon's legislative director, said a million dollars could be saved in administrative costs if the two departments were combined.

One e-mail suggested eliminating the bureaucracy within the Education Department, which employs 1,750 people. Another e-mail suggested Missouri stop accepting funds from the federal government for higher education in order to rid the state of the bureaucracy.

The four senators, education officials and constituent e-mails also suggested:

  • Eliminating sports programs from higher education
  • Creating a television studio to broadcast lessons for at-home virtual classes
  • Dropping expensive billboards that advertise MU
  • Allowing corporations to sponsor secondary education athletics


Another Senate work session focused on finding ways to reduce the state prison population by 2,000 people.

"We can't afford, with the amount of money taxpayers are sending us, to keep all these people in prison," said the work group's chairman, Sen. Matt Bartle, R-Lee's Summit. "It's just the cold, hard reality."

Bob McCulloch, the St. Louis County prosecuting attorney, pointed out problems with state reimbursement policies.

According to McCulloch, if an offender in a county prison moves to a state prison, the county is reimbursed for the offender's stay. If the offender is not sent to a state prison and merely released after a certain amount of time, however, the county is not reimbursed.

"I'd be happy to keep this guy in my jail, but I have to send him to state jail to get reimbursed," McCulloch said.

Bartle referred to this reimbursement practice of "penalizing counties" as a "terribly perverse system" and said re-working it was a "no-brainer."

Other suggestions included setting a formula that would cap the number of non-violent offenders a county could send to state prisons — an option that didn't resonate well with a few county prosecutors.

"Do I let the child molester out, the drug dealer out, the murderer out?" asked Mercer County Prosecutor John Young. "I'm already hearing from my county that we don't have enough money. I can't control the crimes committed in my county ... I can't just say, 'We're having a cap on crime right now, so stop.'"

Missouri Supreme Court Judge Mike Wolff told the four senators the parole system has a "really good gap" between their official guidelines and the amount of offenders actually released. According to Wolff, who is also the chairman of the state Sentencing Advisory Commission, parole officers exercise their own discretion, which is often more cautious than the guidelines set in place.

"If everyone who was eligible for probation and parole got probation and parole, we would have 2,000 less prisoners," Bartle said.

Another suggestion was to raise criminal fines. Bartle said criminal fines have not increased or been adjusted for inflation since 1979. The work group estimated $27 million could be raised from higher fines.

Bartle said the "No. 1 citizen input" he received was from those against prison amenities such as cable television. According to e-mails, many Missourians said prisoners receive unnecessary luxuries, a sentiment Bartle described as "public angst."

The Missouri Corrections Department had a different take on the matter.

"If the prisoners can watch football on Sunday, it's a lot easier to manage (them)," said Matt Sturm, the legislation liaison for the department. "If there's no activity for them, they're fighting each other, or they're fighting us."

Social services

Senators spoke with the heads of the departments of Mental Health, Health and Senior Services and Social Services about the possibility of merging the three departments. Department of Social Services Director Ronald Levy said his agency has been looking into the possibility of privatizing child support enforcement, which is now conducted by about 800 state employees.

What's next

In late afternoon, the chairs of the eight work groups presented their findings to an informal session of the Senate. No votes were taken by the Senate on the proposals.

Shields said his colleagues staff would try to find current bills that could be vehicles for some of the proposals. He also said they would look for ideas that could be offered to the executive branch for executive orders to state agencies.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.