Senate committee advances state department cuts

Thursday, April 8, 2010 | 12:01 a.m. CDT

JEFFERSON CITY — Proposals to consolidate parts of Missouri's executive branch took a step forward in the Senate but stagnated in the House during two committee hearings Wednesday.

In the Senate, the General Laws committee passed two pieces of legislation, one to implement an audit of all departments to find wasteful resources and another to consolidate the Elementary and Secondary Education and Higher Education departments. However, a separate proposal in the House to merge the state highway and water patrols was met with significant opposition.

The Senate committee, by a 5-0 vote, approved a constitutional amendment that, if passed as is, would abolish all but one of the state departments. But its sponsor said that's not the desired outcome. Senate Speaker Pro Tem Charlie Shields, R-St. Joseph, called it a "shell bill" that will be significantly altered. This shell bill could be an avenue, he said, for combining the two education departments, a move that has been pushed by Gov. Jay Nixon.

Shields gave the Senate another means to consolidate Wednesday with a separate constitutional amendment that would modify the state Board of Education so it covers all public schooling in the state, including higher education.

"We also believe you may have to have two separate amendments at the same time, and they'll both have to pass," Shields said of the education consolidation. "But it's April, and we do have time to put them together, but we want to get the vehicles moving and work on the details as the month goes on."

Shields said the education consolidation would save millions of dollars, and streamlining departments would increase efficiency and quality of education.

"The reason to do it is to create a better higher education system," Shields said. "Right now DESE (Department of Elementary and Secondary Education) is a very strong department; higher education is a weak department."

By another 5-0 vote, the committee approved a Shields-sponsored bill which would require the state commissioner of the Office of Administration to issue a report by the end of the year analyzing programs in every executive department that can be cut or consolidated. Three people speaking on behalf of alcohol manufacturers and distributors testified they feared the bill would be used to combine the Missouri Division of Alcohol and Tobacco Control with the Department of Revenue.

Shields said he was not sure what the bill would be used for. He said he had merely thought about moving the liquor board but not yet moved to act on that notion.

"I've been here 20 years, and I've never before had groups testify against a thought in my head," said Shields, who served in the House from 1991 to 2002 before moving to the Senate. "The bill doesn't say anything. I haven't executed my thoughts and already they're against it."

Senate General Laws Committee Chairman Jack Goodman, R-Mt. Vernon, acknowledged that, with five weeks remaining in the session and a likely contentious budget debate slated to begin next week, it will not be easy to pass these bills. But he added that, with a budget shortfall in the hundreds of millions, any measure that can save money could still make it to Nixon's desk by the middle of May before the session ends.

"It's very possible to get this done in five weeks," Goodman said. "Unless we hear that this is really bad policy, we have to take a long look at any cost-cutting measure we can."

In the House Public Safety Committee, a plan that would combine the highway and water patrols was faced with stern opposition.

Currently, both patrols fall under the jurisdiction of the Department of Public Safety. Under the proposed legislation, the water patrol would become a subsidiary of the highway patrol.

The bill's sponsor, Rep. Jeff Roorda, D-Barnhart, touted the consolidation of the two patrols as a cost-saving measure. According to testimony by Public Safety Department spokeswoman Andrea Spillars, the measure could save the state as much as $3 million annually.

"This is about efficiency," said Spillars, who spoke in support of the bill.

But former Missouri Water Patrol Colonel Rad Talbert said the move was a "knee-jerk reaction" to the state's budgetary woes, which have left lawmakers scrambling for solutions.

Talbert said the plan, which would assign troopers to the highway and water patrols interchangeably, could be dangerous and costly. Supplemental highway patrol training for water patrol officers would demand as much as $180,000, and even then, he said, lives would still be at risk.

"To put an officer in a boat that drives so differently than a car is looking for a disaster," Talbert said.

The committee's chair, Rep. Mark Bruns, R-Jefferson City, said the committee could vote on the bill next week.

Back in the Senate, Shields said the proposed consolidation  for the highway and water patrols doesn't appear as likely to garner support nearly as much as his proposal to combine the education departments.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Norma Huckstep April 17, 2010 | 3:19 p.m.

It's odd that Mr Shields is defensive with relation to public testimony against ".....thoughts that were just in my head....". Clearly - the thoughts were not "just in his head" - or the public wouldn't have known about them. Therefore, the public would have had no need to inform the legislature in public testimony of the seriously potential negative effect of his "thoughts". If a legislator is bringing up a bill - let's make certain all intended facts are in the intial draft of the bill. This is NOT the time to be playing "shell" games.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.