advertisement

Missouri Senate moves forward with bill to cut in-home care

Monday, April 19, 2010 | 9:45 p.m. CDT; updated 12:31 a.m. CDT, Tuesday, April 20, 2010

JEFFERSON CITY — The Missouri Senate advanced a bill Monday that would reduce in-home services for those on the state Medicaid program due to the objections of some senators who said it would cut benefits without saving money.

Legislative staff estimated the bill, as written, would save the state $11 million in 2011. Sen. Tom Dempsey, R-St. Charles, who sponsored the bill, said this would be achieved in part by reducing reimbursements to those on Medicaid and allowing the state to privatize its assessments of who is eligible for in-home health care. Currently, the state health department is responsible for all assessments.

As of September, 42,827 Missourians on Medicaid received some kind of in-home health care treatment. Dempsey said reducing services is just one step towardbalancing the state budget, a process he said Gov. Jay Nixon made more painful.

"The governor's lack of a blueprint is why we got to where we are," Dempsey said.

Sen. Wes Shoemyer, D-Clarence, said he questioned whether the move would even save the state money. He added that privatizing in-home assessments would be damaging to a state workforce that he said is already underpaid and underappreciated .

"We are in some pretty tight budgetary times and some sacrifices need to be made by all people," Shoemyer said. "The last people that should have to sacrifice are our state employees."

Sen. Chuck Purgason, R-Caulfield, one of the state's leading deficit hawks, said he supported the bill, but said additional cuts need to be made across the state budget in order for cuts to be effective.

"When you talk budget, everything needs to be on the table," he said. "Everyone needs to feel the pain."


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

JOHN PAROLIN April 19, 2010 | 11:11 p.m.

How dare the State, with all it's resources, attempt to balance the budget by denying continued funding for in-home health care to individuals you would otherwise be confined to a nursing home. The federal constitution makes allowances for the rights of individuals to enjoy life, including people with disabilities. The State's primary function is to promote and foster cooperative actions by people and organizations that make a positive difference in the individual and collective lives of people at greatest risk and need in Missouri.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements