Missouri House approves spinal cord funding measure

Monday, May 3, 2010 | 8:41 p.m. CDT

JEFFERSON CITY — An amendment that would prohibit embryonic stem-cell research from being funded by University of Missouri System grants was narrowly approved by the Missouri House on Monday.

The amendment was attached in a bill which would increase five-fold the amount of money UM Curators can grant for research on spinal cord injuries, from $50,000 to $250,000.

Before the full House overwhelmingly voted to raise available grants, Rep. Therese Sander, R-Moberly, was narrowly able to add on an amendment that would prohibit any funding recipient from using money on embryonic stem-cell research, which she said "kills children."

The 77-73 vote split party lines, with a number of mostly rural Democrats supporting the amendment. Many Republicans voted no, including bill sponsor Rep. Steve Hobbs, R-Mexico, and Speaker Ron Richard, R-Joplin. One of the supportive Democrats, Rep. Rachel Bringer of Palmyra, said it would clearly redefine acceptable norms for UM-funded research.

"Tremendous numbers of Missourians are very concerned about what medical research we do," Bringer said. "We have to make sure we set limits for the moral values of our state."

Hobbs said he feared the "superfluous" amendment would make the state less attractive to researchers and said it was puzzling that Sander would amend something that is already prohibited or that could at least be stopped in the appropriations process.

"I think there's a lot of us trying to figure out what (Sander) was doing," Hobbs said. "I know I still am."

Rep. Chris Kelly, D-Columbia, said the amendment does nothing that isn't already in state law other than to "pander" to hard-line social conservatives.

"This creates the impression that we, in this state, are out of our minds," Kelly said. "There's no reason to approve this but to play to the most extreme instincts of some of our citizens."

While Hobbs opposed the amendment, he said he didn't think it would be enough to hamper the main effects of the bill, which passed 150-3. Hobbs said the bill would be a major economic boon to research facilities, namely in Columbia. The region's representatives spoke strongly in favor of the bill, saying it is a boon for MU researchers.

Hobbs said increasing the grant money was critical to attracting private researchers to work with public universities across the state, including the campuses in Rolla, Kansas City and St. Louis.


Hobbs said he was more concerned about the fact the bill needs to be reconciled with the Senate-passed version, which doesn't have an amendment similar to Sander's. The Senate and the House must hold a conference committee next to work out a compromise on such differences between their versions of the bill.

"There is still a lot more discussing left to do," Hobbs said, adding that he will speak Tuesday with Senate sponsor Bill Stouffer, R-Napton. "What the final bill will look like, I don't know. But I know that today was a great step forward."

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.