advertisement

Council approves rezoning near Grindstone Parkway

Monday, May 3, 2010 | 10:58 p.m. CDT; updated 10:37 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, May 5, 2010

*CORRECTION: Craig Van Matre is the legal representative for THF Red Oaks and THF Grindstone Plaza. An earlier version of this article misidentified his client.
John Glascock made the comment that left turns could cause risky weaving through lanes. An earlier version of this article misidentified the speaker.
The debated traffic light would allow left turns. A earlier version of this article incorrectly reported this information.

COLUMBIA — Despite concerns that installation of a stop light would slow traffic flow on Grindstone Parkway, over 20 acres of property on the road have been rezoned from agricultural to commercial land.

The Red Oak Investment Company’s plans to install the traffic light on a proposed intersection opposite to Grindstone Plaza Drive have drawn concern for several months from both the Columbia City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Those plans have been tied to the rezoning request, which has never been opposed. After a debate Monday night about finer details of the consequences of installing the light and intersection, the council approved the request to rezone the property.

Not wanting to slow down while driving on Grindstone is not reason enough to deny the request, said Craig Van Matre, the legal representative of THF Red Oaks.*

“If you deny this because of a stoplight, you will be wasting a valuable resource,” said Van Matre, who also represents THF Grindstone Plaza, the shopping center that includes Walmart and several other stores and restaurants.

Red Oaks intends to sell the property for commercial use, he said. Development at that location could benefit the city economically, he said.

One of the points discussed during the public hearing and by the council was how the new intersection could affect the flow of traffic.*

John Glascock, Public Works director*, said the option to turn left could cause risky weaving through lanes.

David Brodsky, a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission, spoke as a citizen and voiced concern for adding further impediments on one of Columbia’s busier streets.

“As the east section of town develops on the other side of 63, the west side will have to travel east across town,” Brodsky said. “I feel clogging up any of these roadways is harmful to the economic viability of the community.”

Sixth Ward Councilwoman Barbara Hoppe also questioned changing the flow of traffic. She said that her research of council meetings since 2003 didn’t seem to support installing an intersection at the proposed location.

“All my reading of what happened previously is that the plan was to keep the traffic moving on (Grindstone),” Hoppe said.

After about half an hour of discussion, Mayor Bob McDavid pointed out that both council and planning and zoning agreed that the land was best used commercially. 

"If we reject this, we are allowing planning and zoning to become traffic engineers," McDavid said. Rejecting the plan based on disagreement on traffic flow around the intersection, he said, would have "unintended consequences."

In March, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-2 to not recommend the rezoning application for the 25.3 acre property. The commission agreed rezoning for commercial use was appropriate, but concern over the traffic light overshadowed approval.

The council subsequently tabled the issue on April 7 at the request of Red Oak Investment Company.

The council approved the rezoning Monday by a 5-1 vote. Hoppe dissented; First Ward Councilman Paul Sturtz was not at the meeting.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Ann Peters May 4, 2010 | 8:48 a.m.

Good Morning, I am a Planning and Zoning Commissioner with The City of Columbia. The issue was not about zoning it was about how traffic flows. The Commission talk a great deal about Right in Right out of the property. Traffic wishing to go west should exit from the back of the property turning right to the light that is all ready installed just West of the property. The property owner wants to have traffic stop in front the the property, this is more convenient for the property owner but not the community as a hole. More back ground reading should have been done by the Missourian reporter.The minuets from Planning and Zoning are on line.
Ann K Peters

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith May 4, 2010 | 9:04 a.m.

... the community as a hole." I don't think that's an accurate description of our community. Do you?

(Report Comment)
Brian Mortensen May 4, 2010 | 10:31 a.m.

"turning right to the light that is all ready installed just West of the property."

Where is this? Green Meadows/State Farm and Grindstone?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements