advertisement

Proposal a pre-emptive strike on real estate sales tax

Wednesday, May 5, 2010 | 12:01 a.m. CDT

COLUMBIA — A proposal by Missouri Realtors to bar a tax on real estate transfers would eliminate a revenue option that other states use.

The Missouri Association of Realtors on Sunday submitted petitions for a statewide vote this fall that would prevent state, county and local governments in Missouri from imposing any tax on the sales or transfer of homes or real estate. The issue could appear on the November ballot.

The tax is levied in 37 other states plus the District of Columbia, but there are no legislative proposals to introduce such a tax in Missouri.

Elizabeth Mendenhall, a Columbia resident and president of the 22,000-member Realtors Association that sponsored the petition, on Tuesday said the proposed constitutional amendment is a deterrent to introducing the tax in the future.

Mendenhall said the proposal would support the economy by keeping the housing market vibrant.

“We are fortunate to have more affordable houses in Missouri," Mendenhall said. "It is important that we do not have this tax in the future as it would make buying houses more expensive."

State Rep. Chris Kelly, D-Columbia, said “it is conceivable the amendment could reduce avenues for raising taxes in future,” and termed it as an attempt to fix “a nonexistent problem.”

Ed Robb, a policy analyst and former state representative, said the current dip in tax revenues has raised fears the state might opt to impose a real estate transfer tax but added that he was “not sure whether or not it is necessary” to enact the proposed amendment.

Mendenhall said the proposal would have “a zero effect” on Missouri’s fiscal position because the tax does not exist.

Realtors have termed it a “double taxation,” saying it amounts to paying tax twice because residents already pay annual taxes on their properties.

Robb, who has a finance background and previously taught economics at MU, said the tax in question does not qualify as a “double taxation” in the strict definition of the term.

“That’s a stretch. I would not agree in a strict sense,” Robb said.

A clear example of double taxation, he said, is the payment of taxes on dividends, which are already taxed at the corporate tax level.

The Missouri Association of Realtors announced Monday that it had collected sufficient signatures to submit a ballot proposal to the Secretary of State.

If the signatures are found to be from valid registered voters, then the proposal will be included on the ballot as a constitutional amendment in November’s general election.

Election officials have until Aug. 3 to certify the petitions for a statewide vote.

The Associated Press reported it would take 147,000 to 160,000 signatures for the proposal to be on the ballot.

Mendenhall said the association had collected “well above” the minimum number of required signatures.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Mike Martin May 5, 2010 | 10:45 a.m.

Good for the Realtors! I had to pay this onerous tax several times in another state, and let me tell you -- it's no fun.

You bust your rear end making your house as nice as it can be to sell, and you pay commissions, closing costs, etc. once you sell it.

Having the state come in and grab a chunk of the proceeds (several thousand dollars each time in my case) -- which, by the way, the Federal government used to do but stopped doing over a decade ago -- is a terrible blow. The government already collects property taxes, income taxes, capital gains taxes, estate taxes, employment taxes, all manner of fees and surcharges, and now, a fine if you don't buy health care insurance.

Rep. Kelly says "it is conceivable the amendment could reduce avenues for raising taxes in future."

I say, good! It's about time we reduced avenues for raising tax revenues, partly because our politicians routinely spend those revenues in the most foolish of ways; but mostly because we shouldn't be slaves to government.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements