The week in comments: SWAT raid reactions, coming to the tea party's defense, reviewing city policies

Sunday, May 9, 2010 | 5:34 p.m. CDT

Every week, readers of offer their opinions on the news and the Missourian's coverage of it. Here, we offer you a digest of some of the conversations we found most interesting. Click any of the links to join in.

SWAT raid promts police review of policy
Comments: 22 / Commenters: 20

Columbia Police SWAT team began to review their policy after a dog was fatally shot during a raid of a man's home in February. A video of the incident was released on YouTube.

Comments from Missourian readers reflected their disapproval of the Columbia Police in regard to the incident.

Carla Thomas said, "i plan on referring this case to the national humane society which i am a member of. The officers in this case should be relieved of their duties and fired." Trevor Hoffman added, "Why doesn't that bald fat cop come out and tell us how he got that warrant, OFF AN ANONYMOUS TIP. This is exactly why the people don't trust the CPD."

Doug Spencer spoke in defense of the department saying "...keeping a pit bull in the home where illegal drugs are used or sold is cliché. The officers have every right and obligation to defend themselves against the pit bulls these dirt bags keep."

COLUMN: Democrats, media stereotype tea party
Comments: 13 / Commenters: 8

J. Karl Miller's weekly column was about how the media "have moved on to demonize the tea party movement."

Mark Montgomery lead off the discussion by going against Miller, saying the group is "just a sad group of old, white, rich, malcontent republicans who hate blacks, hispanics, asians, the middle class and the poor and hate the fact that we have a black president." Janice Daniels, a tea party organizer, countered, "We the People have a right, no, a duty to restore this American Republic and we intend to do so regardless of what misinformed people say or what they call us." What ensued was a discussion of liberal versus conservative values and which party served America's best interest.

City Council will vote on conference costs for review board
Comments: 4 / Commenters: 4

Columbia City Council was scheduled to vote on how much they are willing to spend to send representatives to Seattle for the four-day National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement conference on Sept. 20 to 24.

Executive editor Tom Warhover and reporter Alison Gammon posted the first comments refining the costs of the trip for two representatives to Seattle. After that, reader Allan Sharrock said discussing the minute costs was unnecessary and instead, "The discussion should be that is costs too much and we shouldn't be wasting money." Ellis Smith agreed and said that reviewers should be looking into the details on costs instead.

GUEST COLUMN: Empowering the black powerless
Comments: 4 / Commenters: 4

This column by William E. Robertson calls for the action of local leaders to answer the question regarding the 'black powerless' community of Columbia.

Reader Tyree Byndom enjoyed the column and said it agreed with every radio broadcast Robertson has done. Mike Martin agrees with the article, but asks the following question: "But what if local Black leaders fail to act when opportunities to improve Black empowerment in Columbia arise?"

TODAY'S QUESTION: Does Columbia need a full-time SWAT team?
Comments: 4 / Commenters: 3

In response to all the attention recent SWAT team activity in Columbia gained, the Missourian asks the readers if Columbia needs a full-time SWAT team.

Eric Cox does not think a full-time team is necessary, saying "If SWAT is what it takes to protect me from the scourge that is a 25-year-old landscaper who smokes pot, than I can do without SWAT." Charles Farley says someone is lying, and it must be those in power. "The police chief should be fired. The mayor should be voted out. The judge who signed the warrant should be named, and voted out of office as well."

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


carla thomas May 9, 2010 | 5:45 p.m.

well,doug,those dogs were of no threat to you and your swat bullies!!!! those dogs were in what is known as kennel crates,yet you preceded to shoot the dogs anyway while doing so infront of that 7 year old boy which you terrorized,your swat bullies also fired shots with automatic weapons in a home where a child was present,in my mind that in it,s self is child endangerment.I urge you to prosecute the police officers featured in the following video: Missouri state statute MO ST 578.012 1 (1) & (2) which reads:1. A person is guilty of animal abuse when a person:(1) Intentionally or purposely kills an animal in any manner not allowed by or expressly exempted from the provisions of sections 578.005 to 578.023 and 273.030, RSMo;(2) Purposely or intentionally causes injury or suffering to an animal;The officers in the video are not exempt under any provision of the state statues and as such should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

your swat bullies violated missouri state statute on animal therefore i,ve sent a complaint to the national humane society against you and your swat bullies.i hope the national humane society pursues charges against the columbia police department and against you and your swat bullies.if they do pursue charges against your department and against your so called team then they have my blessing,i hope they pursue criminal charges.

(Report Comment)
Jose Melendez May 10, 2010 | 6:23 a.m.

"Dirt bags"? They shot the dogs.

Prohibitionists have planted, watered and fertilized the seeds of many class action lawsuits with their lies and fraudulent, profitable drug wars.

Schedule I, the list of drugs with “no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision” includes cannabis and cannabinoids, despite the issuance of 2003 U.S. Patent No. 6630507*, "Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants ".

Schedule III Marinol is a synthetic chemical that works like THC, a psychoactive ingredient in marijuana. It is administered at 100 percent strength, up to five times more powerful than the strongest available strains on the black market, about twice as strong as hashish. Generically named Dronabinol, warning labels specifically PERMIT driving and using machinery when users know how the medicine affects them.

For millions of Americans arrested over demonstrably false claims and outright perjury, reparations are long past due.

* Patent No. 6630507:

(Report Comment)
Carl Kabler May 10, 2010 | 8:03 a.m.

I don't think it's unreasonable for a city like Columbia, to have a (back up) SWAT team for EMERGENCY situations, such as hostage or armed robbery or murder type situtations,where they might be needed in a standoff, but really,I just can't see how using them in situations like the video clearly showed are even close to appropriate use of force or personell.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.