IBM could bring $4.3 M to schools, slow budget cuts

Monday, May 24, 2010 | 7:30 p.m. CDT; updated 10:02 p.m. CDT, Monday, May 24, 2010

COLUMBIA — After several years of budget cuts, including more than $4 million last year, IBM's arrival in Columbia could be a major boon for Columbia Public Schools.

At a news conference May 17 to announce IBM's new facility, Mayor Bob McDavid said the company could bring $4.3 million in additional tax revenue for the district. Superintendent Chris Belcher said the district would receive the money over 10 years, which would mean about $400,000 of additional income each year.

Belcher said the new facility could result in the purchase of about 300 homes in and around the city. About 65 percent of the school district's operational revenue draws from local property taxes, so an increased demand for homes could only help the school district.

"We've obviously been hurting due to lower sales taxes and lower property tax revenues," Columbia School Board President Jan Mees said. "It will definitely help our coffers."

Mees said the projected windfall could help recoup the significant losses in revenue suffered in the past couple of years. The board has been trying to manage money shortfalls to cover the district's "most pressing needs," she said, but it's "like hitting a moving target."

In a Thursday morning work session, the board decided it would vote on a budget that would eliminate 79 employee positions at its next meeting. IBM's presence in the city, though, could lessen the cuts for a while.

"It's a very tight budget, and we're trying to be as efficient as possible," said Jonathan Sessions, the newest member of the board. "We may now have opportunities that we may not have had before."

But the money is not expected to solve all the district's woes. Belcher said the money would go toward hiring teachers because new homes usually mean new students. He doesn't anticipate trouble with the increase in enrollment, though.

"We're at 17,000 students now; a growth of 300 more will be dealt with," Belcher said.

Mees said the district is used to accommodate a changing population. A new high school and elementary school are currently under construction. They were paid for by two bonds, the latest of which Belcher thinks enticed IBM to move to Columbia.

Belcher was acting as the spokesman for the district at a reception for IBM and city officials involved in the deal on the night of the municipal election in April. It was there he learned the $120 million bond passed by 77 percent of Columbia voters.

"I think it's a good thing the bond issue passed with such a high majority because it showed IBM we're a progressive community," Belcher said.

Belcher said he attended three or four of those receptions as the representative for the district. Some see the decision of IBM as a stamp of approval for the district.

"It definitely has a connection to the quality of our public schools," said Michelle Baumstark, spokeswoman for the district.

Mees also sees future gains for the district because of the move. She said it might attract other companies to Columbia as well.

"This may be the start of something big for the community," Mees said.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Robert Jones May 24, 2010 | 8:59 p.m.

My question to the school district is, have they told the realtors they have changed the mapping of the district? I still see on a lot of the websites of realtors that they have the wrong schools listed on their websites. This to me is a major oversite. Yes the average wage for an perspective IBM employee is approximately $55,000. If the school district thinks that these people will be buying houses in Thornbrook with a price tag of $250,000, which haven't changed much on the remapping, they must be out of their minds.

(Report Comment)
Ray Shapiro May 24, 2010 | 10:03 p.m.

("Belcher said IBM's move will result in the purchase of about 300 homes in and around the city.")

Is Belcher saying that IBM plans on relocating 300 families for jobs which I thought were going to existing residents and future MU grads?

(Report Comment)
Ellis Smith May 25, 2010 | 6:27 a.m.

Ray Shapiro says "... for jobs which I thought were going to existing residents and future MU grads." REALLY? Where does it say that the jobs will all be awarded to existing residents and future MU grads? In fact there are laws in this country concerning discriminatory hiring practices, and any policy of excluding hires from other geographic and/or university or college venues would violate those laws. MU is not the only institution of higher learning in either this city or this state whose graduates might be qualified to work for IBM.

Geez! How can a city with three institutions of higher learning in it be so "provincial"?

(Report Comment)
Ray Shapiro May 25, 2010 | 2:08 p.m.

What's wrong with being "provincial?"
If I didn't care about the residents of Columbia, I also wouldn't care about this...

(Report Comment)
Audrey Spalding May 25, 2010 | 7:07 p.m.

I wrote about this press conference and article on the Show-Me Institute's blog. In short, there is no substance to back the projected $400,000 additional tax revenue for the school district.

However, it is a certainty that the city council's purchasing of the LeMone property has reduced the school district's tax revenue income by roughly $47,000 per year.

PS. I once reported on the Columbia Public School District for the Missourian.

(Report Comment)
Robert Jones May 26, 2010 | 1:57 p.m.

We will see. I would be willing to bet... 1.That there will be more people from outside coming in. 2. Most of which will be renting, thus not paying any new property taxes. And when they continue to make budget cuts from Columbia Public Schools you can say, "My goodness, he was right."

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.