advertisement

COLUMN: Anti-Taser group's petition drive helps make Columbia great

Thursday, June 3, 2010 | 12:01 a.m. CDT; updated 1:15 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, June 15, 2010

*Ken Green's name was misspelled in a previous version of this column.

The right to petition our government for redress of grievances is one of the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. So when I read in the Missourian that a band of activists planned to exercise that right Wednesday, I tagged along. It’s always inspiring to see the First Amendment in action.

Sixteen of the People for a Taser-Free Columbia gathered in the lobby of City Hall, briefly explained their purpose to the assembled journalists and proceeded upstairs to deposit their petitions with the city clerk. Their number included three children and several well-known greybeards. Among the latter were mayoral candidate Sid Sullivan, bookseller and civil libertarian *Ken Green, and retired professor and frequent essayist Gene Robertson.

Driving force Mary Hussmann had planned to hold the media event outside, by the new Keys to the City sculpture, but the rain pushed us indoors. The sculpture (which sure looks more like a keyhole than a key) would have made a nice background for the cameras. I couldn’t help thinking of its metaphorical significance.

The kind of civic activism personified by the People for a Taser-Free Columbia surely is, and long has been, a key to what’s best about Columbia. You don’t have to agree with the goal of a petition drive to admire those sufficiently committed to a cause to hit the streets, accost perfect strangers and collect signatures. It was a petition launched by students more than 30 years ago that gave us for a time our unique status as the only city with its own deposit ordinance. It was a petition drive that abolished that ordinance. Most recently, a petition drive led to the vote that will place surveillance cameras downtown.

Many petition drives these days, of course, rely on the efforts of paid solicitors. That’s true, for instance, of the drive to do away with the Missouri Plan of selecting judges. There’s big money behind that campaign. Not so with the anti-Taser campaign.

When I asked, Mary assured me that “nobody got so much as a cup of coffee” for circulating these petitions. That makes even more impressive the 4,000-plus signatures submitted this week. Just to make sure they have the required minimum of 3,667, the People plan to continue collecting during the 30 days the clerk has to examine those already turned in.

The Taser-Free Columbia members have no illusions about the likelihood that our newly reconstituted City Council will approve the ordinance that would make it a Class A misdemeanor "for any Columbia Police Officer or any assisting law enforcement personnel or any other individual to threaten to use or to fire/activate any CED (Conducted Electrical Device), including, but not limited to a Taser, stun gun, stun belt, or shock stick, against any person within the city limits of Columbia, Missouri."

As happened with the downtown camera campaign, once the council rejects the ordinance, it will go on the ballot. The target is the Nov. 2 general election.

I remain unpersuaded of the merits of the Taser-free argument. As long as cops require weapons, this one seems to me preferable to the club or the firearm. On the other hand, there is a depressing record, even here, of Taser use that appears unreasonable and that has produced real harm. Keeping them out of untrained or ill-intentioned hands is clearly desirable. The anti-Taser folks are convinced that effective regulation is impossible.

This is a public policy debate worth having. Whether we agree with them or not, the People for a Taser-Free Columbia deserve our respect. And, as always, the First Amendment deserves our veneration.

George Kennedy is a former managing editor at the Missourian and professor emeritus at the Missouri School of Journalism.

 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Gregg Bush June 3, 2010 | 10:42 a.m.

I want to ensure that law enforcement have all the tools they need to serve and protect the community. I support firearm carrying by the police, although I wish we didn't need it.
However, the TASER use of the CPD is troubling. TASERs are lethal weapons. If they are carried and utilized with that in mind - then the police may keep them.
I look forward to a reasonable debate, and the opportunity to vote.

(Report Comment)
Carl Kabler June 3, 2010 | 10:42 p.m.

Nice well balanced perspective Mr. Kennedy, and I too concur, we should all value the first amend. while also not failing to value the second. Police AND regular citzens have a right to DEFEND themselves from violent attack and I too don't think banning tasers from EITHER group is a prudent idea.

The dividing line and heart of this issue though, seems to me, to be rooted in the question are Leo's ONLY using these tasers in self defense situations OR as some have claimed are they rather being used simply as 'cattle prods' because some officer (or non- police citizen) feels 'disrespected' or in some other way feels they must be judge and jury and inflict *punishment* on the spot.

I think this really is where the center of debate should be, around WHOEVER uses one of these things, are they doing do RESPONSIBLY and as a defensive measure, in PLACE of a gun to REDUCE violence or rather instead to punish and escalate it. ANYONE abusing their right of self defense should IMO lose it, whether cop or non Leo citizen.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements