advertisement

TODAY'S QUESTION: Is Obama's response to the Gulf crisis too little, too late?

Monday, June 14, 2010 | 10:16 a.m. CDT; updated 6:15 p.m. CDT, Monday, June 14, 2010

COLUMBIA — For more than seven weeks, oil has seeped steadily into the Gulf of Mexico. For almost as long, President Barack Obama's response to the environmental disaster has been a subject of great debate.

Critics have characterized Obama's response to the crisis — which began with an offshore explosion on April 20 — as slow and "detached," according to a CNN report. His first three visits to the region were brief — and only to Louisiana; he didn't speak to Tony Hayward, chief executive of BP, for the first 50 days of the disaster.

Meanwhile, supporters have praised Obama's attempt to understand the complex situation unfolding in the region in the face of limited and suspect information from BP, according to the CNN report.

This past weekend, Obama pledged a whirlwind week to stepped-up national response to the crisis. His pledge includes visits to three of the four affected Gulf states — Alabama, Florida and Mississippi — on Monday and Tuesday.

The president will then discuss the oil spill in a nationally televised address from the Oval Office  at 7 p.m. Tuesday. This will be Obama's first speech from the Oval Office.

All this comes before the president's first face-to-face meeting with top BP executives on Wednesday. Obama is expected to make strong suggestions that the company establish a corporate-funded escrow account to pay for damage claims filed by individuals and businesses.

The legality of this ultimatum — which could affect the company's ability to pay its shareholders —has been researched extensively by White House lawyers and justified on the basis of the 1990 Oil Pollution Act, according to a New York Times' article.

Since the explosion, tens of millions of gallons of oil have leaked from a broken well about one mile below the water's surface. The offshore spill — the largest in U.S. history — has already devastated the region's economy and environment.

Is Obama's response to the crisis in the Gulf too little, too late?


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Mark Foecking June 14, 2010 | 3:46 p.m.

What does anyone expect Obama to do about it? The government doesn't have near the equipment or expertise that BP does, and BP knows it is in its best interest to stop the leak as soon as possible also.

He could have saved a bunch of jet fuel by not going there at all. Whether Obama visits the Gulf or not will have zero effect on how quickly this gusher gets capped.

DK

(Report Comment)
Jim Smith June 16, 2010 | 1:23 p.m.

I agree that visiting the site does no good, unless he plans shoveling some beaches. I do beleive, however, that they should not have refused the forign aid that has been offered us. Why not get everyone you can possibly muster down there to soak up that mess?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements