advertisement

TODAY'S QUESTION: Should the government fund broadband service for rural areas?

Monday, June 28, 2010 | 11:16 a.m. CDT; updated 11:36 a.m. CDT, Monday, June 28, 2010

COLUMBIA — Access to high-speed Internet is a right — not a privilege — for hospitals, schools, businesses and residents statewide.

That was the position of speakers at Friday's Rural Broadband Forum. There, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., and Julius Genachowski, chairman for the Federal Communications Commission, discussed the need for greater Internet access in Missouri's rural areas and various challenges facing that expansion.

Internet access in rural areas remains low because service providers have little financial incentive to serve remote, sparsely populated parts of the state. Last year, Missouri ranked 39th nationally in Internet download speed; according to a 2007 report, approximately one-fifth of Missourians live in areas without high-speed Internet access.

Areas without sufficient high-speed Internet access are getting left behind, McCaskill said at the forum. Students in those areas miss out on educational opportunities, emergency responders struggle with communication and commerce and job creation is hindered by slow Internet connections.

Expanded Internet access has long been a topic of concern for various levels of government. The federal stimulus package, enacted in February 2009, included $7.2 billion for state broadband programs; in July 2009, Gov. Jay Nixon announced the creation of MoBroadbandNow, a program focused on competing for those funds and then creating "a fiber-optic broadband backbone" for statewide broadband Internet access by 2014.

Last March, the FCC announced its own proposal to drastically change national broadband policy in order to increase access for underserved areas and to make current connections faster. But the FCC is still assessing what level of access it can provide "without busting the budget," Genachowski said at the forum.

Providers assert that though great strides have been made to give Americans greater broadband access — nearly 300 million Americans now have access, compared to approximately eight million in 2002 — government funding is needed to reach others in harder-to-reach rural areas.

Should the government fund broadband service for rural areas?


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Bill Rohde June 30, 2010 | 2:32 p.m.

There is no business case for broadband deployment in rural missouri. Too high of costs and too few subscribers. Senator McCaskill stated at the hearing that as was the case with railroads, then national highway system and telephone service, federal help or incentives are needed to deploy broadband. I agree. The federal Universal Service Fund, mandated by Congress, has worked well to bring rural America telephone services that are comparable in quality and price to those in urban areas. This program, or something similar, is needed to deploy broadband to our rural areas. Unfortunatley, the FCC's proposed Nat'l Bband Plan (NBP)if passed will phase out the Unversal Service Fund. The NBP also proposes to help fund 100 mbps services to urban America but only 4 Mbps to rural America. This is bad news for rural areas and will create a digital divide. I think rural America needs access to more than 4 meg for education, public safety, medicine, economic development, etc. Congress and the FCC needs to hear from rural America. Speak up now, before it is too late.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements