advertisement

Tanning tax rolls out Thursday

Wednesday, June 30, 2010 | 8:20 p.m. CDT; updated 8:26 a.m. CDT, Thursday, July 1, 2010

COLUMBIA — Beginning Thursday, it will cost customers 10 percent more to use tanning beds.

The so-called "tanning tax" is the first provision to take effect in the federal Health Care Reform Bill that passed in March.

The tax on tanning services will help fund $2.7 billion of the total $940 billion cost of the health care bill, according to the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.

It applies to tanning beds that use one or more ultraviolet lamps with wavelengths between 200 to 400 nanometers. Not included are spray tans, tanning lotions and other sunless tanning options.

Although tanning salon owners and customers have opposed the tax as a deterrent to business, strong support has come from dermatologists who cite a link between cancer and tanning beds.

Karen Edison, chair of the MU department of dermatology, said Wednesday that anything to discourage tanning is a step in the right direction.

“The FDA has called UV light a carcinogen since 2002,” Edison said. “There is no such thing as a safe tan.”

According to the American Academy of Dermatology Association, ultraviolet radiation levels for indoor tanning devices can be 15 times greater than tanning outdoors. At the current rate, according to the association, one in five Americans will develop skin cancer.

Edison said she is concerned about the increase in skin cancer, especially melanoma, and premature aging of the skin in young women.

“We know that nearly 70 percent of those who go to tanning beds are women 16 to 29 years old,” she said. “I am seeing skin cancer in younger girls.”

John DeSpain, a dermatologist with the DeSpain Cayce Dermatology Center and Medical Spa in Columbia, also said he supports the tanning tax.

“I see people every day with skin cancer, some most likely from tanning beds,” he said. “Tanning beds cause health problems.”

Tanning salon owners, many of them women who own small businesses, worry that it will discourage customers.

Melanie Karrick, who owns Key Largo Fitness and Tanning, said she objects to the tax, although she does not yet know how it will affect her business.

“I have held my prices for many years,” she said. “It doesn’t help business owners or the customer. A 10 percent increase is very high.”

Rick Mount, owner of Profiles Tanning Salon on Vandiver Drive, said he has no official information about the tax.

“I have received zero paperwork,” Mount said. “All I know is that it is a 10 percent increase. I don’t know if it is just for packages or retail.”

He predicted that loyal customers will continue to tan because the tax is universally distributed.

“If people are going to tan, it’s not going to make a difference,” he said. “All companies are going to have the same tax.

Denise Hooton, of Columbia, who tans at Catch-A-Tan on Vandiver Drive, said the tax will not prevent her from continuing to tan.

“I don’t think it will affect my tanning, but I think it’s expensive enough as it is. I don’t think (tanning salons) need a tax,” Hooton said.

Gretchen Winkelmeyer, a junior at MU and indoor tanner at Pacific Beach Tanning Studios on Grindstone Parkway, also said she is not bothered by the tax.

“I think the tax makes a lot of sense since it is going towards health care,” said Winkelmeyer, who said she tans infrequently to avoid health risks. “I go into tanning knowing that it can cause cancer.”

 

 


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

John Schultz July 1, 2010 | 10:11 a.m.

What was that campaign promise again? "If you make less than $250,000, your taxes will not raise one penny" more or less?

(Report Comment)
Gregg Bush July 1, 2010 | 10:23 a.m.

No tan - no tax.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz July 1, 2010 | 10:48 a.m.

Did President Obama's various promises to not raise taxes on people making less than $250,000 include that disclaimer in the small print?

(Report Comment)
Tim Dance July 1, 2010 | 12:12 p.m.

Agree, no tan, no tax. Apples and Oranges. Nice try. You know that he meant income taxes, but libertarian/tea party deception is to be expected.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz July 1, 2010 | 2:35 p.m.

Oh good Lord Tim, nice job protecting the man at the top. So if cap and trade sends utility prices up, and I think Fired Up Missouri and/or Show Me Progress have had blog posts in the past month saying they will to a degree (though not as much as Republicans), is that OK?

Ain't it funny though, how candidate Obama claims that none of your taxes will rise under his plan:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8erePM8V...

Please do square that with your income tax-only assertion when you have a moment. Deception indeed!

(Report Comment)
Mark Flakne July 1, 2010 | 3:20 p.m.

Obama, Bush, and the rest of the power grabbers in Washington rely on the general ignorance of the American public at every turn. Business and corporate taxes are always passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices, lower quality goods, and fewer jobs. For some reason, so-called progressives can’t seem to understand this simple fact. Even those among their collectivist ranks who are able to communicate in complete sentences stick their collective heads in the sand when faced with reason as they clamor for higher taxes on businesses, corporations, and the rich. With heads buried, it stands to reason that the “tax the rich” mantra is likely trumpeted from an alternative orifice.

Obama knows that by applying taxation to rich individuals and corporations he can set himself as hero to the ignorant voting masses while driving the country into further economic despair. Then he can buy votes with welfare checks.

It’s Trickle Down Economics turned on its head to become Trickle Down Taxation.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements