St. Louis VA Medical Center secretary: Inadequately sterilized equipment 'unacceptable'

Thursday, July 1, 2010 | 6:26 p.m. CDT; updated 9:43 a.m. CST, Thursday, February 17, 2011

ST. LOUIS — The Veterans Administration said Thursday that the chief of dental services at a St. Louis VA Medical Center has been placed on administrative leave after the hospital urged nearly 2,000 veterans to return for blood tests because inadequately sterilized equipment might have exposed them to viral infections during dental procedures.

An independent board will also investigate how employees failed to properly sterilize the dental equipment that potentially exposed veterans to infections, including hepatitis and HIV, the administration said.

"The mistakes made at the St. Louis VA Medical Center are unacceptable, and steps have been and continue to be taken to correct this situation and assure the safety of our veterans," VA Secretary Eric Shinseki said.

The VA sent letters out Monday to 1,812 veterans who had dental procedures at the St. Louis center from Feb. 1, 2009, through March 11 of this year, saying reviews determined that some sterilization steps in preparing dental instruments were not in compliance with standards.

Officials said the infection risk is extremely low, and no illnesses have been uncovered so far out of some 100 veterans who have come in for blood work that will screen for hepatitis B, hepatitis C and HIV.

Rep. Russ Carnahan, D-Mo., said the House Veterans' Affairs Committee also said it would investigate what happened at the center and planned to hold a hearing in St. Louis. The announced investigations follow demands for action by several lawmakers from Missouri and Illinois; the St. Louis region's five VA facilities serve veterans in both states.

VA Under Secretary for Health Robert Petzel said he found there was a need for an independent review by the national Administrative Investigation Board "to determine the reasons for failure to follow correct procedures."

No date has been set for the Veterans' Affairs Committee hearing in St. Louis. Two Missouri congressmen, Republican Blaine Luetkemeyer and Democrat William Lacy Clay, also asked the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee to investigate. Both serve on that committee.

Lawmakers also want to know why it took so long for the VA to inform the veterans about the mistakes. The problem was uncovered in March and letters went out Monday.

Marcena Gunter, a spokeswoman for the St. Louis center, said the delay was because officials were evaluating the risk posed to veterans.

The name of the suspended chief of dental services was not released. A VA spokeswoman did not respond to interview requests.

The VA said patients who have had dental procedures since March 11 are not at risk because procedures were corrected.

Shinseki said that over the past 18 months, VA has implemented more stringent safety oversight at its medical facilities, and that oversight led to the identification of problems at the St. Louis facility.

VA centers around the country have had problems in recent years. In 2007, Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington came under scrutiny over concerns about conditions at the hospital and treatment of veterans. At the time, St. Louis VA officials said they were working to fix similar problems.

That same year, a surgeon at the VA hospital in Marion, Ill., resigned after a patient bled to death following gall bladder surgery. All inpatient surgeries were suspended. The VA found at least nine deaths between October 2006 and March 2007 resulted from substandard care at the Marion hospital, and another 10 patients died after receiving questionable care that complicated their health.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Allan Sharrock July 1, 2010 | 7:20 p.m.

Gatta love government run health care.

(Report Comment)
Ed Ricciotti July 1, 2010 | 9:36 p.m.

I am sure there has been privately run hospitals that have had a breech in sterile protocol. :)

(Report Comment)
Allan Sharrock July 2, 2010 | 8:58 a.m.

The difference is that when a private hospital does it I can choose to visit another place or sue. With the VA I can't. This isn't the first time the VA was mistreated vets. Lets just face the fact that they are not paid as much as the private sector and therefore they are lower quality doctors. Unless they are patriots who just want to help vets. Look at how many positions are open at VA clinics. Go to and search.

(Report Comment)
john MITCHELL July 5, 2010 | 5:45 p.m.

You can choose to goto another VA hospital at your own cost just like in the civil sector. You can also sue for malpractice. I know a few people who choose to go to other clinics further from their homes because of the type of care they recieve. I have been to dental clinics where the dental tech signs for the sterilization of the equipment prior to use, promoting accountability. The misfortunate thing with all of this is procedures are written because of someone elses mistakes and a lot of times in blood.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.