advertisement

U.S. Postal Service stamp rates might increase; Saturday delivery in question

Tuesday, July 6, 2010 | 9:24 p.m. CDT; updated 9:20 a.m. CDT, Wednesday, July 7, 2010

COLUMBIA — With an increasing deficit, the U.S. Postal Service proposed raising the prices of stamps and postcards by 2 cents Tuesday. That and congressional hearings, which begin Monday, to possibly cut Saturday postal deliveries might cause some Columbia residents an inconvenience.

Stamps are set to increase from 44 to 46 cents and postcard rates are to increase from 28 to 30 cents. The federal Postal Regulatory Commission must approve or reject changes to stamp and postcard prices. The commission has 90 days to respond. If the price changes are approved, they will take effect Jan. 2, 2011.

According to a news release by the Postal Service, the price increases will help raise about $2.3 billion for the first nine months of 2011.

Postmaster General John Potter said in the release that “these proposed rate adjustments are moderate and part of a fair and balanced approach to insuring mail service for all Americans well into the future.”

Joanne Veto, a Postal Service senior manager, said there are two things a consumer should know about the increase in postage prices.

“The first is an increase in prices for stamps and postcards by 2 cents, and the second is the new Forever Stamp,” Veto said. “The Forever Stamp, which you can buy starting in October at the current rate of 44 cents, will keep its price and is valid forever."

Andrew DuCharme, general manager of Lakota Coffee Company, said he is annoyed with the increase in postage stamps.

“Paying 2 extra cents is not the end of the world but not something I’m thrilled about,” DuCharme said.

Increased prices with the rise of inflation are not new, but changing the amount of delivery days is.

Since the 1980s, Congress has required mail delivery six days a week. Starting Monday, Congress plans to discuss if it is time to make the change. The Postal Service has been dealing with financial issues and drops in mail volume for the past three years and is looking to Congress, said Gerry McKiernan, another Postal Service Senior Manager.

“We are projecting a $7 billion deficit for the next fiscal year, and the price increases will only raise $2.3 billion,” Veto said.

McKiernan said the shift away from paper mail to electronic communication has caused an “erosion” in the volume of mail since the Postal Service's highest year four years ago.

“The Postal Service delivered a record number of pieces of mail at 213 billion pieces in 2006,” McKiernan said. “We have never delivered more pieces of mail.”

McKiernan said the Postal Service dropped to 177 billion pieces in 2007 and 2008. With the increasing drop in mail, local postal offices are in financial trouble.

He said the Postal Service would never return to the volume of mail it processed before the recession.

One solution is to eliminate Saturday deliveries.

“Saturday is the lowest volume day of the week and in addition, at least one third of all businesses are closed,” McKiernan said. “More Americans, more homes and more places for us to go everyday have costs increasing but revenue decreasing.”

Lori Fleming, city finance director, said Columbia wouldn't be affected by five-day delivery service because city allows residents 20 days to pay a bill.

“I really don’t anticipate any affect on the city,” Fleming said. “We always provide enough days of service.”

Fleming said she encourages paperless billing options online instead of receiving a bill in the mail.

Along with eliminating one day of delivery and increasing postage rates, the Postal Service is also asking Congress to consider removing the requirement to prepay $5.6 billion dollars every year for the Postal Service Retiree Health Benefit Trust Fund, McKiernan said. The fund was established under Title VIII of the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006.

The Postal Service is finding it difficult to comply with the fund, and McKiernan said it needs some relief from Congress.

“We are trying our best, but volumes are not matching our responsibilities,” McKiernan said. “No company is paying 10 percent to accommodate entire health benefits.”

The Postal Service has expressed concerns for their customers.

“We do not want our customers to have to carry all of the burden for this deficit," Veto said. "We have gone to congress with a series of options.”

DuCharme does not anticipate a problem with his business because of the change.

“For us, the only important things we get on Saturday are checks from a wholesale account,” DuCharme said. “Most of the time, we don’t get those until Monday, anyway. Any mail on Saturday, we just get it Monday morning.”

Columbia resident Steven Schopp still gets his bills in the mail but is willing to adapt.

"Five out of seven days is plenty to get mail out. Saturday is the weekend," Schopp said. "It's usually junk anyway."


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Ramona Droege July 15, 2010 | 9:03 p.m.

If only the public knew, the Post Office is ran by a bunch of idiots. It is management top heavy and their motto is, LET'S WORK HARDER NOT SMARTER. They spend so much money on automated machines to sort the mail and make the job a lot harder to deliver it. They are losing business because of their stupid management decisions. They delay so much mail by hiding it in tractor trailers because they don't have the staff to get the mail to the carriers. They violate the contracts of both the clerks and carriers all the time. Letter carriers take pride in their jobs but management is trying to take that away from them. It has been an American tradition for many years to get mail 6 days a week why stop it now. The Post Office needs an internal investation and audit.

(Report Comment)
tom kelly July 16, 2010 | 12:00 a.m.

All I want to know is who pays for all the junk mail and coupons and Whole coupon magazines that come daily? If they pay you well to carry tons of crap to every home in America, great. But, if WE are paying to carry whole forests worth of junk, which just ends up in the trash for the trashmen to carry, then it is not OK. I tried bundling up a month's worth of junk mail and "return to sender" but the post man just laughed.

I know it's not the letter carrier's fault which is why I am asking. So anybody who works in the Post Office, get on here and let us know the true facts. thank you

(Report Comment)
Mark Foecking July 16, 2010 | 2:43 a.m.

tom kelly wrote:

"All I want to know is who pays for all the junk mail and coupons and Whole coupon magazines that come daily?"

Advertisers - businesses, political campaigns, gov't agencies, non-profits, people like that. They pay the printing costs and postage (usually presort bulk rate, which is a lot cheaper than regular first class). Another casualty of electronic communication is the printing industry.

But times march on. It's unfortunate, actually, because it's a far more complicated thing, fundamentally, to distribute mailings electronically. But it works for now, and some people are going to be left in the dust.

DK

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements