JEFFERSON CITY — An attorney says a health insurance measure should be stricken from Missouri's ballot because it puts voters in an awkward position. Missouri's Aug. 3 ballot proposes a two-part law. One part says the government cannot require people to have health insurance — in contrast with a new federal law. The other part allows insurance companies to voluntarily dissolve. Attorney Chip Gentry told a judge Tuesday that voters might like one part but not the other, yet would face a single "yes" or "no" vote. Gentry said it violates Missouri's constitutional requirement that legislation address a single subject with a clear title. State Solicitor Jim Layton argued both parts refer to the subject of insurance. He says ballot measures often have several components.
UPDATE: Lawyer: State's insurance measure might lead to confusion among voters
Tuesday, July 13, 2010 | 11:56 a.m. CDT;
updated 4:55 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, July 13, 2010
To read the full article, please sign up or login.
Get full access to the Columbia Missourian on your computer, phone, and tablet for just $5.95 per month.
* Unlimited access on your iPhone, iPad, Android phone and Android tablet
* All the high-quality, in-depth journalism of the Columbia Missourian and Vox Magazine, updated 24/7
* Your news. Your device. Your time.
If you'd like to read more about the value of being a member, read this column from the Missourian's executive editor, Tom Warhover.
advertisements