advertisement

Citizens Police Review Board: Police acted appropriately in raid

Wednesday, August 4, 2010 | 11:29 p.m. CDT; updated 12:23 a.m. CDT, Thursday, August 5, 2010
Ed Rosenthal, left, talks with Donnie Warren one of the founders of CoMoCitizens, after the Citizens Police Review Board meeting on Wednesday in front of City Hall. Rosenthal filed an appeal with the review board concerning the Columbia SWAT team raid in February.

COLUMBIA — None of the more than 30 people who attended the Citizens Police Review Board meeting Wednesday night — including two California residents who filed the first appeal the board received — were allowed to speak before the body made its decision regarding a February raid by the Columbia SWAT team.

The board voted 4 to 3 to accept Chief Ken Burton's findings that the officers involved in the raid acted appropriately.

Review board member resigns

Commission on Human Rights and Citizens Police Review Board member Mary Bixby resigned her post from the commission Tuesday night. In a short e-mail, she said she resigned because of personal reasons, City Counselor Fred Boeckmann said.

The commission appoints one member to the board, so when Bixby resigned from her position on the commission, her seat on the board was vacated. She was not immediately available for comment Wednesday night.


Related Media

Related Articles

Ed Rosenthal and Angela Bacca, marijuana law reform activists from California, filed an appeal of Burton's internal investigation of the Feb. 11 incident at 1501 Kinloch Court in which a pit bull was shot to death by SWAT officers. A small amount of marijuana was found in the house. A 7-year-old child was also present during the raid. 

But the activists weren't allowed to address the board before it voted.

In the pre-meeting gathering, board member Susan Smith vehemently argued against allowing Rosenthal to speak before the board rendered its decision.

"We didn't ask for him to come," Smith said.

"I don't feel like this guy is going to tell us a thing that we don't know," board member Stephen Alexander added. "I don't think I want to talk to him."

The board eventually agreed.

Once the official meeting began, after more than an hour of discussion the board approved another of Smith's recommendations: that the board accept Burton's findings that the officers involved in the raid acted in accordance with the law and Police Department policies when they killed the dog in the raid.

Smith also said the board should accept the policy changes Burton has since instituted in the department and recommend that the City Council officially adopt those policy changes. Board member Steve Weinberg proposed an amendment that in future raids, a specific officer needs to be in charge of making every effort to know beforehand whether children or animals are on the premises.

But before the vote, board member Betty Wilson argued that Burton's findings about the officers' actions and the policy changes he implemented are two separate issues. She asked that the board put off a decision so Burton could provide more information about certain aspects of the department's internal affairs investigation.

"The investigation by the chief was very narrow ... " Wilson said of the department's investigation. "All I'm saying is, it should be broadened."

Ultimately, Wilson suggested splitting the motion into two separate votes. It was one of many instances during the meeting when the board seemed confused about proper procedure.

Wilson, board member John McClure and board chairwoman Ellen LoCurto-Martinez voted against accepting Burton's assessment that the officers acted within the law and department policies at the time of the raid.

Weinberg voted yes, but said he did so "with a troubled mind."

All seven board members in attendance voted to accept Weinberg's amendment and Smith's recommendation about department policies.

Some board members also indicated they'd like to move on from the Feb. 11 SWAT raid and focus the board's attention on other issues. Many said they appreciated the changes Burton put in place.

After the board made its decision regarding the raid, it briefly debated whether to allow public comment. Weinberg said he wanted to give Rosenthal 10 minutes to address the board, since he was an official complainant. He also wanted to give other members of the public time to speak.

Once again, Smith argued against allowing public comment.

"I don't think we need to hear any more, and especially from Mr. Rosenthal," she said.

Finally, the board voted to allow Rosenthal five minutes to speak and other members of the public three minutes.

Nearly all of the people who came to the microphone had praise for the changes Burton has implemented since the incident drew an international audience on YouTube.

But the board also heard frustration about its decision not to hear from Rosenthal and Bacca, the two complainants, and other members of the public who had come to talk to the board about the SWAT raid.

Rosenthal, during his comments, acknowledged that the board faced a difficult decision Wednesday night. But he criticized the board for not conducting its own investigation of the incident.

"Why didn't you hire a private investigator?" he asked.

He also said the officers involved in the incident could have been suffering from post traumatic stress disorder at the time of the incident, or could currently be suffering from psychological disorders stemming from the raid, that could make them a danger to the community.

And the board has an obligation to Columbia residents to take another long look at the raid, Rosenthal said.

Mitchell Richards, who spoke as a representative of local activist group Keep Columbia Free, said he was proud to have a police chief who could admit the department made mistakes. He said Burton's policy changes were a step in the right direction.

However, he said he was disappointed the review board was acting as advocate of the Police Department and not hearing from the public.

"There are two police media spokesmen here, they can speak for the police," he said. Police spokeswomen Jill Wieneke and Jessie Haden were in the audience.

After the meeting, Rosenthal said Smith acted as if she were a spokeswoman for the Police Department during the meeting. He said she should resign.

Burton was out of town and did not attend the meeting. Deputy Chief Tom Dresner, who was in attendance, said he had a hard time following the board's debates.

"I feel like we don't have a clear sense of direction," he said.

Will Guldin contributed to this report.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Mark Flakne August 5, 2010 | 8:26 a.m.

Susan Smith is not fit to serve on this board and should be removed. If you doubt this, go to a CPRB meeting.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz August 5, 2010 | 9:32 a.m.

She certainly doesn't have an open mind if she didn't want to allow Ed Rosenthal to speak before the board. Yes, he's not a Columbia resident, but the current ordinance does not prevent him from filing a complaint and speaking toward it. Her comments as described in the paper make her unworthy to sit on the review board.

(Report Comment)
Mark Flakne August 5, 2010 | 10:00 a.m.

This story left out the really crazy things she said. Since the Missourian offered a live stream of the meeting, I wonder if there is a recording. Her opening manifesto alone would make the case for removal quite clear.

And, btw, it wasn't just the Californians she sought to silence, she wanted no public comment at all.

(Report Comment)
Joy Mayer August 5, 2010 | 10:19 a.m.

Thanks for the question, Mark. The video live stream wasn't archived, but you can scroll through the live chat from last night's event here: http://www.columbiamissourian.com/storie...

— Joy Mayer, ColumbiaMissourian.com

(Report Comment)
Scott Lauher August 5, 2010 | 8:31 p.m.

I didn't realize that CPRB meetings were invite-only events...I mean, why should hearing from the citizens be acceptable at a Citizen's Police Review Board meeting?

(Report Comment)
Donald Warren August 6, 2010 | 3:10 p.m.

At the August 4th Columbia, MO Citizens Police Review Board meeting, Susan Smith, a board member, delivers a crazy rant about how marijuana possession is comparable to terrorist acts and manufacturing meth.

Now you tell me, who looks like a terrorist to you?

watch her here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwmVKFrqQ...

(Report Comment)
John Schultz August 6, 2010 | 3:56 p.m.

Section 21-47, subsection e of the Columbia ordinances forming the review board state:

Board members shall follow the National Association for Civilian Oversight of Law Enforcement (NACOLE) Code of Ethics.

That code of ethics can be found here:

http://www.nacole.org/images/stories/pdf...

Sure sounds to me like she flunks on respectful and unbiased treatment, among other characteristics.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements