advertisement

Dinner train wins time to develop accessible car

Advocates for those with disabilities move, but fail to sway, City Council
Monday, September 20, 2010 | 11:17 p.m. CDT; updated 8:38 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, July 12, 2011

COLUMBIA — The company bringing the Columbia Star dinner train to town will have five years to provide a car accessible to people with disabilities, the Columbia City Council decided Monday night.

"I hope that the company will make this happen," Sixth Ward Councilwoman Barbara Hoppe said.

The decision means the train, which is now waiting to be shipped from Iowa, could arrive in Columbia within two or three weeks. Plans call for dinner rides from Columbia to Centralia and back.

Representatives of Central States Railroad Associates said they are excited about the possibility of creating a dinner train with a car fully accessible to people with disabilities, but it will need a source of outside money to do so. Greg Weber, manager of the dinner train, talked with City Council members about the issue Monday night.

Advocates for people with disabilities have said the dinner train should have an accessible car the day it begins business here, especially if it receives city support. Several people spoke at Monday's meeting, including Kathleen Weinschenck, her partner Greg Ahrens and Disabilities Commission Chairman Homer Page.

"It will be considered a step backward for the disability community if the dinner train comes to Columbia without an accessible car," Page said. "Columbia has made a commitment to make an accessible community."

Council members struggled. Mayor Bob McDavid said there was no solution that entirely satisfied him. In the end, the council voted unanimously to extend the deadline from two years to five years for coming up with some way of providing an accessible train car.

Weber and Central States President Mark Vaughn wrote a letter to the city dated Monday, saying the expense of creating a vintage rail car that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act is too high.

"As a small business, we simply cannot carry such financial burden alone on a large project such as this," the letter stated.

Still, the Disabilities Commission did not support the proposal.

"Five years seem a long time (to me)," Page said. "I am concerned accessibility would not take place."

Central States argues that vintage trains are exempt from meeting ADA requirements because they are antiquated rail cars.

City Attorney Fred Boeckmann, asked to weigh in on the legal aspects of the matter, said he had read the company's arguments but had not researched the issue himself. He doubted whether complying with the disabilities act would ever become economically feasible. Hoppe was more optimistic, saying city grant writers and others might be able to find creative sources of funding.

Lorah Steiner, executive director of the Columbia Convention and Visitors Bureau, sees both sides. She backed Central States, saying the company wants to serve people with disabilities, but she agreed it will need time and money to do so. She has previously said that requiring compliance with the ADA from the outset would prevent the dinner train from coming to town.

"It is important not to confuse desire with what it is economically feasible," Steiner said.

Weber agreed during the council meeting, saying the company probably would not come to Columbia if it were required to bring a compliant car immediately.

The big picture is price versus good will. Central States said it would cost $175,000 to make a vintage rail car accessible. It would need wider aisles, a compliant restroom and a side-entry door. That would eliminate seats necessary to produce the right amount of income to make the dinner train business viable, it argues.

The letter from Central States said it is willing to work with the city to add an ADA car to the historic train in the future. By doing so, it would become one of the first companies in the country to offer a fully compliant, vintage dinner train.

"We are really looking forward to coming to Columbia," Weber said. "We feel this is a good area."


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Kirsten Richards September 21, 2010 | 6:16 p.m.

I am ashamed to live in a city that though generally considered enlightened and progressive has decided to sell out their disabled citizens.

Accessible train cars are not rare or a novelty. I've ridden in them. Neither is discrimination, even 20 years after the passing of the ADA.

No, the ADA does not exempt vintage facilities when they have been renovated. At the time of renovation they are supposed to be brought up to code. A vintage dining car isn't going to meet city health code either, but I presume the necessary funds were spent to comply with those regulations.

The city picks and chooses who counts and who doesn't. The disabled apparently count only when it comes to collecting their taxes, and not when it comes services provided by the city. What makes this so wrong is that the city is funding this business and stabbing the disabled in the back all at the same time.

I don't suppose the city bothered to at least set up an escrow account for the money that needs to be set aside for this delayed compliance. What's to stop the company from making their money in five years and when the novelty wears off just leaving town to avoid having to comply? If they had to set aside from their income 1/5 of the amount needed to comply each year, they'd have a vested interest in following through with their promise. With an escrow account, if this company jumped ship without complying, the money set aside could be used for accessibility with the next hair-brained adventure the city decides to spend tax-payer's money on.

I for one encourage everyone to boycott this business until they come to realize that Columbia doesn't consist of a two class system and that the disabled are not second class.

(Report Comment)
Bill Fisher September 21, 2010 | 8:15 p.m.

Chill, Kirsten, the disabled-accessible cars are on the way. They first need profits before they'll have enough money to pay for the upgrades.

This is great news, and I'm glad it didn't get held back from everyone just to satisfy a few who may or may not even use it.

(Report Comment)
Ray Shapiro September 21, 2010 | 10:45 p.m.

@Kirsten Richards: Great post and I agree with what you stated, in its entirety.
If every one who has a relative with mobility issues or has a friend, (or just a heart), understands the snub that has taken place during our city's and the Chamber of Commerce's negotiations with this private enterprise, (which will profit from local touristy activity on "public" rails), then an escrow account would provide a bit of credibility and meaningful assurance.
Family, friends and all compassionate people should hold off on supporting this "dinner train" until a "good faith" account is in place. And, if they want our business and it becomes feasible to be ADA compliant before a half a decade, then that would just be more brownie points for them.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements