Opposed neighbors win council's support on Great Hang-ups rezoning

Monday, October 4, 2010 | 11:31 p.m. CDT; updated 2:22 p.m. CDT, Tuesday, October 5, 2010

The City Council vote was 5-2 against rezoning. An earlier version of this article gave an incorrect vote.

COLUMBIA — After four public hearings on a proposal to rezone the Great Hang-ups property and adjacent land, neighbors opposed to the request won the City Council’s support.

The council voted *5-2 to reject the request involving property at West Broadway and West Boulevard, despite the unanimous approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission last month.

Mark Nichols and Patra Mierzwa, owners of Great Hang-ups Framing and three adjacent residential properties, wanted to rezone the four-parcel property from residential to a planned business district.

Last week the planning department approved a protest petition, filed by concerned neighbors. The petition required signatures from at least 30 percent of owners within 185 feet of the property; 10 neighbors signed the petition. The approved petition meant the proposal would have required an affirmative vote by five members of the council rather than a simple majority of four.

Cookie Hagan, president of the Historic Sunset Lane neighborhood association, worried that the developers failed to include a detailed site plan that would have addressed issues such as traffic flow, entrances and exits, parking and sewer systems, she said.

“It’s very important to see a site plan because no one has bought the property yet,” Hagan said. “It’s putting the cart before the horse. We don’t want our corner to be another costly mistake.”

Second Ward Councilman Jason Thornhill moved to table the decision until the owners could submit a site plan. But the prospect of prolonging the debate, which has been ongoing for months, prompted the council to vote.

Virginia Carpenter said the neighborhood would be compromised, not enhanced, if the rezoning were to occur.

“It shouldn’t be that the wants of one overrule the needs of many,” she said. “Businesses come and go. Our neighborhood should not be a part of the gamble.”

Hagan and other opposed neighbors were pleased with the council’s decision.

“Now we have an opportunity to do something right. We care about our community, and I hope they take some time. We don’t want mistakes,” she said.

The council's rejection of the rezoning request means Nichols and Mierzwa cannot file another request for at least a year. 

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Ray Shapiro October 5, 2010 | 1:38 a.m.

Commissioners on commissions, which are ignored by the Council, should resign.
Why have these commissions if 10 neighbors can decide the future of potential businesses in Columbia, based on NIMBY, when D&H is right across the street?
Perhaps the city leaders want to keep hanging up these owners until they just leave Columbia, in disgust, and Parks and Rec can grab the land for another park.
These fellow Columbia citizens are being jerked around, in my honest opinion.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz October 5, 2010 | 11:29 a.m.

Seems to me that a site plan is only required when development is nigh, not rezoning. If the neighbors don't like it, perhaps they should buy the land and let the rest of Columbia determine what they can or cannot do with it?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.