GUEST COMMENTARY: Fiscal reform committee's recomendations not likely to solve problems

Thursday, November 25, 2010 | 12:01 a.m. CST

We have seen the future and it is grim.

That glimpse of the road ahead arrived in the form of a preview of the Bowles-Simpson Commission's report on the kinds of things government has to do (and not do) if we want to avoid economic doom.


Related Media

Things like giving up tax breaks we never even knew were breaks, extending our working years to the cusp of senility, absorbing even higher gasoline taxes, accepting (if you're a government worker) a pay freeze and (if you're well-off) paying more into Social Security but taking out less.

Oh, it's going to be a fun time, the future is. I can hardly wait for it to get here.


The Commission — officially named the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform — was created by President Barack Obama to find ways to avoid the 12-car wreck our economy is headed for. It's ostensibly a bipartisan group, meaning that it's made up of partisans on both sides of our political divide.

Its co-chairmen are Erskine Bowles, a Clinton apparatchik, and Alan Simpson, formerly a maverick Republican Senator from Wyoming — now just strange. Their report, a trial balloon designed to see where the shooting will come from when the full report comes out, is what we're talking about now.

As it turns out, the shooting will come from everywhere. The Democrats hate the cuts in programs. The Republicans are angry about the tax hikes. The military-industrial complex loathes the cuts in military spending. Farmers can't abide doing away with farm subsidies. Old people object to losing their Social Security cost of living increases, and the middle-aged are appalled at the thought of waiting until they're 69 to collect retirement benefits.

The good news is, I suppose, that none of the above has even a remote chance of being made into law. No sane politician would vote for any of that, unless he or she is planning on an early retirement.

The American people have made it plain that they don't want draconian sacrifice; they don't want any sacrifice at all. They want all the benefits due them (plus 10 percent) and they want someone else to pay for it.

The bad news is that even if all of those things were done — all the cutting, all the taxing — it still wouldn't be enough to make the looming budget deficits go away.

That's because the plan doesn't seriously address the continuing explosion of health care costs, particularly for a rapidly aging population.

It assumes that politicians will slow the rise by "establishing a process to regularly evaluate cost growth" and taking "additional steps as needed."

Alan, Erskine ... if they could do that, we wouldn't be in this mess in the first place.

As it is, the plan is a deeply conservative document. It cuts spending $2 (some say $3)  for every $1 it asks in tax increases. And while some of the taxes fall on the wealthy, most (like the reduction of mortgage interest deductibility) are aimed at the middle class.

In return, the plan would cut the upper income tax rate from 35 percent to 23 percent and corporate tax rates from 35 percent to as low as 26 percent.

Everybody likes lower taxes but that represents a shift from the not-so-rich to the rich and very rich.

So we'll blunder ahead. We'll do nothing, argue about everything and slouch toward disaster.

The worst is what's happening to the states, which isn't dealt with in the Bowles-Simpson report. Their revenue sources are tapped out, so they're cutting to the bone and then cutting the bone. And the last slice comes from education budgets.

You know, we can treat old people badly, we can deny the rich their second homes, we can leave farmers to their own devices, and we can limit ourselves to one war at a time. We can even (sob) let our national parks go to ruin.

But when we fail to educate our children, we maim the future.

If we have a future.

Donald Kaul worked some 30 years as a syndicated Washington columnist for the Des Moines Register before retiring at the dawn of the new century. When the nation responded by electing George W. Bush —  as president — he quickly saw the error of his ways and re-enlisted in the fray as a columnist for, a project of the Institute for Policy Studies. He lives in Ann Arbor, Mich.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.