advertisement

Senate passes package extending Bush tax cuts

Wednesday, December 15, 2010 | 12:54 p.m. CST

WASHINGTON — The Senate has passed a sweeping tax package that would save millions of Americans thousands of dollars in higher taxes for the next two years while also reducing their Social Security taxes and extending jobless benefits.

The $858 billion package now goes to the House, where many Democrats are unhappy with a provision that allows estates as large as $10 million to pass to heirs tax-free. Democratic leaders, however, say they expect the bill to ultimately pass and become law.

A wide array of tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush are scheduled to expire on Jan. 1 — just two weeks away — affecting taxpayers at every income level. The bill, which was passed by the Senate on a 81-19 vote would extend the cuts for two years.

The Senate, which is expected to pass the bill with broad bipartisan support, debated several amendments Wednesday morning. One would make the tax cuts permanent, one would pay for part of the package by cutting spending elsewhere, and one would replace a proposed payroll tax cut with an extension of Obama's Making Work Pay tax credit. All the amendments were expected to fail, as the final details of the package were worked out days ago.

Nevertheless, many House Democrats continue to oppose the estate tax provision, though leaders in that chamber say they expect the bill to ultimately pass.

"Let's find out if Republicans really want to jeopardize income tax, payroll tax and estate tax relief for every American in order to provide a budget-busting bonanza to the country's richest estates," Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., wrote in an op-ed in Wednesday's Washington Post. "House Democrats think this trade-off should be debated and voted on in the light of day."

Rep. Bill Pascrell Jr., D-N.J., said, "We can jump up and down all we want about the higher-end estate taxes, and I don't think anything's going to change because the Senate isn't going to change it."

Obama on Wednesday urged Congress to pass the plan quickly.

"I know there are different aspects of this plan to which members of Congress on both sides of the aisle object. That's the nature of compromise," the President said before meeting with business leaders. "But we worked to negotiate an agreement that's a win for middle-class families and a win for our economy, and we can't afford to let it fall victim to either delay or defeat."

House Democratic leaders say the bill could come for a vote in that chamber as early as Wednesday evening.

"I think the Senate is going to pass this measure ensuring that no one's taxes go up by a very significant margin, and I hope that our friends in the House will understand that that's the best way to go forward — simply pass the Senate bill, get it down to a president who supports the understanding," said Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

McConnell warned House Democrats that any changes could derail the entire package.

"This agreement is not subject to being reopened," McConnell said.

The bill would extend expiring tax cuts at every income level. It also would renew a program of jobless benefits for the long-term unemployed that is due to lapse, and enact a one-year cut in Social Security taxes. The bill's cost would be added to the deficit.

Some Senate Republicans are balking at the price tag, noting that Obama's deficit commission recently outlined the massive fiscal problems facing the nation. Most Senate Republicans, however, are expected to support the bill.

"The American people are going to be looking, and they're going to say, does the Senate get it? Do they understand the severity and the urgency of the problems that face our fiscal future?" Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said Wednesday.

At the insistence of Republicans, the plan includes a more generous estate tax provision: The first $10 million of a couple's estate could pass to heirs without taxation. The balance would be subject to a 35 percent tax rate.

The lower estate tax infuriated some Democrats who were already unhappy with Obama for agreeing to extend tax cuts for individuals making more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000.

"This administration fights for nothing," said Rep. David Wu, D-Ore.

The estate tax was repealed for 2010. But under current law, it is scheduled to return next year with a top rate of 55 percent on the portion estates above $1 million — $2 million for couples.

House Democratic leaders want to bring back the 2009 estate tax levels. That year, individuals could pass $3.5 million to their heirs, tax-free. Couples could pass $7 million, with a little tax planning, and the balance was taxed at a top rate of 45 percent.

House Democrats met in a closed-door session Tuesday evening in which member after member stood up and vented about various aspects of the bill. Other House Democrats, however, said they were eager to pass the package.

Thirty-one members of the conservative Blue Dog Democrats sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi urging quick passage of the bill.

"It is time for us to put aside the partisan talking points and accomplish what the American people sent us here to do," said the letter.


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Derrick Fogle December 15, 2010 | 3:54 p.m.

The only part of this package that I have a real problem with is the Social Security tax "Holiday." What's the chance it will ever be allowed to lapse? Social Security just lost 20 years of solvency.

At least I've always figured I would have to work until I die.

(Report Comment)
Mickey Smith December 15, 2010 | 4:33 p.m.

"The bill's cost would be added to the deficit." That right there is the worrisome part. Yeah we may not pay it but our kids will be paying it back. Can the deficit really afford to get much bigger. The ship is sinking folks, duct tape can only last so long.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams December 15, 2010 | 4:38 p.m.

The title of this article will soon be incorrect.

If the President signs the bill, it will officially be the "Obama tax cuts."

I like it.

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire December 15, 2010 | 4:41 p.m.

I'm elated to see that fiscal conservatism won the last election. Now we can really begin trimming the deficit. But wait.. somewhere there's a missile to launch first.. And let's not let any freeloaders weasel their way out of paying for that missile!!! I'm tired of paying for everyone's missiles. (hic)

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire December 15, 2010 | 4:43 p.m.

Yes, you too can go to the Chinese debtor prison. The rich need your organs.

(Report Comment)
Jimmy Bearfield December 15, 2010 | 5:06 p.m.

I'll take the SS rate cut, temporarily or permanently. That's more money I can save to fund my retirement because only a fool would believe that SS will be around a generation from now.

(Report Comment)
John Schultz December 15, 2010 | 5:25 p.m.

Permanently would be great. Fund the SS balances for those over a certain age (45, 50, etc.) and let the rest of us save for a real retirement with dignity.

(Report Comment)
Paul Allaire December 15, 2010 | 5:53 p.m.

When I was young I read a lot of literature that said the program would be insolvent before what is now long ago. People still say as much, but somehow we are able to dip into it for a little "stimulus". Maybe someone should notify the FDA.

(Report Comment)
Michael Williams December 15, 2010 | 6:02 p.m.

John Schultz: For many years, I've been in favor of privatizing social security, but here's the biggest reason:

It's heritable.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements