Missouri's Jerrell Jackson drop swings momentum at Insight Bowl

Tuesday, December 28, 2010 | 11:08 p.m. CST; updated 11:18 p.m. CST, Tuesday, December 28, 2010

TEMPE, Ariz. — As Missouri's Jerrell Jackson entered the locker room at halftime, his 118 receiving yards were easily forgotten.

His seven catches approached his season high of nine in Missouri’s victory over Oklahoma. He’d capitalized on his speed throughout the half to make big plays and, after missing the beginning of the season with a broken wrist, he looked completely healthy. He should have walked off the field with a confident swagger. If you’ve ever watched Jackson, you can picture the bounce he should have had in his already energetic walk.

The last seconds of the half, though, changed all of that. Missouri ended the half down by only one touchdown. The Tigers knew they’d have the ball to begin the second half, but Jackson and his teammates had come close to a tie game. The tie hit Jackson in the hands — literally — but he couldn’t quite hold on to the points.

After an 11-play, 214-yard drive in which Missouri quarterback Blaine Gabbert looked like the high-level NFL quarterback prospect that he is, Jackson was poised to score. Gabbert’s pass was on target, but as Jackson sprawled over the yellow W in the Iowa end zone, Missouri’s chance at a halftime tie disappeared. It was the definition of a momentum shift as the football ricocheted into Iowa defensive back Brent Greenwood’s hands.

The play came as Missouri seemed to finally find a balance in its game. The first half of Tuesday night’s Insight Bowl was studded with flashy plays from Missouri. Gabbert, who went 23-31 for 284 yards, relied on long catches from Jackson, Wes Kemp and T.J. Moe, and Missouri’s passing offense was marked by a fast tempo and rapid substitutions. The long passes and diving catches didn’t pay off at first, though, and the Tigers’ first touchdown came on a 10-yard run by Henry Josey. What should have been the final drive of the quarter was the first in which Gabbert’s long passes seemed to pay off in the red zone.

On Monday, Gabbert emphasized his team’s need to score early.

“Any time you can score points on your first drive — whether it be a touchdown or a field goal — it just gives the team confidence that you can score points at will,” Gabbert said.

Although his team did score a field goal on its first drive, the three points seemed almost underwhelming after both the early Iowa touchdown and the speed and efficiency with which the Tigers had moved down the field. Missouri scored first in all but two of its games — both Illinois and Nebraska came out to early leads — and it has not had much experience with coming back from behind this season.

As the half came to a close, Missouri seemed to have found its rhythm, and as the ball spun out of Gabbert’s hands and the clock ticked to zero, a comeback was close. It was just a fingertip, a slippery grip, a sliding cleat away. In the end, it was just one drop, a few yards lost by Jackson after 118 gained, and the Tigers had 30  minutes left to make the comeback a reality.

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Yves Montclear December 29, 2010 | 7:50 p.m.

The Missouri Tigers had ample opportunities to win their Insight Bowl game. Over and over again. In fact, I still can't believe they lost. I keep shaking my head, thinking I will wake up.

But, to write a headline that seems to single out one player as possibly the cause of their defeat, is simply poor journalism.

Anybody who watched the game (besides apparently the headline writer of this article), knows that isn't true.

(Report Comment)
Joan Niesen December 30, 2010 | 11:57 p.m.

Mr. Montclear,
I believe that the copyeditor who wrote the headline meant to emphasize that Jackson's drop swung the energy of the game before halftime. Instead of going into the locker room tied with Iowa, Missouri was still down and had turned the ball over to end the half. That's the sentiment that I hoped to convey in my story--that the drop and consequent interception turned the momentum against Missouri at the half--and I don't think that the headline in any way is meant to blame Jackson for the loss.
- Joan Niesen

(Report Comment)
Yves Montclear December 31, 2010 | 12:41 a.m.

Joan, I understand, you wrote a good article about the game, that was well written. I read it.

The 'headline' for the article with Joan Nieson as the author of it, you on the byline, was not well written. Tell the copyeditor that is my opinion.

Here is the headline again:
--Missouri's Jerrell Jackson drop swings momentum at Insight Bowl--

What am I supposed to assume from that headline? If I don't read the rest of the story and just that headline?

It reads to me, like Jackson's drop lost the game. And that is so far from the truth, to only be laughable.

(Report Comment)
Dave Barnick August 21, 2012 | 1:56 a.m.

Nearly two years have past and this headline is still appropriate.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.