advertisement

TODAY'S QUESTION: What should Missouri do about its capital punishment problem?

Friday, January 14, 2011 | 1:25 p.m. CST; updated 3:43 p.m. CST, Friday, January 14, 2011

COLUMBIA — Missouri has enough drug supplies for five executions with the next execution scheduled for Feb. 9.

Documents uncovered by the American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri through a freedom of information request found that the Missouri Department of Corrections has a dwindling supply of sodium thiopental, an anesthetic that renders the condemned inmate unconscious. This drug is required in the state's execution protocol.

Missouri currently has 12 prisoners on death row awaiting executions, and the drug supply expiration date is March 1, according to a document supplied to the state by the ACLU.

Not only is the drug expiring on March 1, but also Hospira Inc. of Lake Forest, Ill., the drug's sole U.S. manufacturer, has blamed supplier issues for its inability to make the drug.

What do you think Missouri should do with capital punishment?


Like what you see here? Become a member.


Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Comments

Paul Allaire January 14, 2011 | 7:58 p.m.

My opinion about what they should do with capital punishment?
They should kill it.

(Report Comment)
frank christian January 14, 2011 | 9:29 p.m.

Why should availability of a prescribed drug pose your question? Have they tried "the street"? Most everything else is available there.

That innocents might die, with the forensic technology of today, holds no water with me. Were the six in AZ "guilty"?

(Report Comment)
Corey Parks January 14, 2011 | 9:30 p.m.

Looks like they better get going with just under 2 months to use it up. What are they waiting for?

(Report Comment)
Ann Edwards January 15, 2011 | 7:08 a.m.

Surely they can buy more on ebay???

(Report Comment)
Mark Foecking January 15, 2011 | 5:19 p.m.

They should change their protocol.

If it were me, I would have a licensed anesthesiologist render the convict unconscious, by whatever means he sees fit, and then have the corrections personnel administer the potassium and the paralytic. That way, the anesthesiologist doesn't do anything against his oath, and the convict is assured a humane death.

Or just use pentobarbital. If it works for animals (and it certainly will if Prop B goes into effect), it will work for humans.

DK

(Report Comment)
Corey Parks January 15, 2011 | 5:58 p.m.

I did not know that it was necessary to place the convict unconscious before delivering a bullet to the back of the neck. What is this world coming too? I bet they even use rubbing alcohol before inserting the needle don't they?

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.

advertisements