Columbia Public School System thinks ahead of proposed food guidelines

Friday, January 14, 2011 | 6:39 p.m. CST; updated 1:40 p.m. CST, Sunday, January 16, 2011

COLUMBIA — The approval of proposed federal guidelines to improve nutrition in school meals wouldn't be much of a surprise for Columbia Public Schools.

“We’ve been ready for a while,” Laina Fullum, director of nutrition services for Columbia Public Schools, said.

The U.S. Agriculture Department published a proposal Thursday to update nutrition standards for school meals subsidized by the federal government. The proposed changes would require schools to add more vegetables, fruits, whole grains, fat-free and low-fat milk and to reduce saturated and trans fats, sodium and calories.

“A lot of these things we’re already doing,” Fullum said.

Throughout the past year Fullum, who is also a registered and licensed dietitian, said the city's school system has implemented pilot programs that address the lack of nutritional options in areas that needed more attention.

While some of the proposed nutrition standards pose challenges to the Columbia school system, a number are already in place.

According to the proposal, these standards include:

Limit calories

For breakfast, the USDA recommends minimum and maximum calorie levels for school meals based on age group: grades K to 5, 350 to 500 calories; grades 6 to 8, 400 to 550 calories; and grades 9 to 12, 450 to 600 calories.

For lunch, the USDA recommends: grades K to 5, 550 to 650 calories; grades 6 to 8, 600 to 700 calories; and grades 9 to 12, 750 to 850 calories.

"This is something we've already had under control," Fullum said. Reduction in calorie intake is managed through the serving sizes in meals, she said.

The number of calories in food can be monitored by checking the labels of every food item they purchase, Fullum said. In addition, a list of nutritional labels offered through the Columbia Public Schools website shows the ingredients of foods offered.

Gradual reductions in sodium

During a 10-year period, the new rule would require schools to reduce the amount of sodium in school meals by approximately 25 to 50 percent.

Fullum said the school system's strategy to lower sodium and maximize nutritious content is to keepcooking simple. This can be accomplished by cooking from scratch, she said.

Eliminate trans fats

This proposed rule would require schools to minimize trans fats in school meals to zero grams of trans fat per serving (zero is defined by the FDA as less than 0.5 grams per serving). 

Fullum said reaching this goal shouldn't be a problem because they're aware of this information from the nutritional labels they keep for the food they buy.

Increase servings of fruits and vegetables

This proposed rule calls on schools to require one cup of fruit for breakfast and a half cup to one cup of fruit and three-fourths to one cup of vegetables for lunch.

"We offer fresh fruits and vegetables at all meals," Fullum said. "When they are required to be on a tray, that's when the cost issue may come in."

Limit milk to fat-free and low-fat and flavored milk to fat-free

"We don't serve anything but skim milk or one percent," Fullum said.

Increase amount of whole grains

The proposed rule would require that eventually most grains be whole grains.

"That's going to be a challenge for us," Fullum said. Whole grains cost a lot depending on the food, she said. However, the schools have been introducing whole grain into meals through foods such as whole grain rice and oatmeal, she said.

Require schools to serve a grain and a protein for breakfast meals

Breakfast is a struggle now for Columbia Public Schools, Fullum said. One reason is the short turnaround time cooks have between breakfast and lunch. In addition, introducing new foods into breakfast will cost more.

The cost to abide by the new rules is a concern for Columbia Public Schools, Fullum said.

To offset some of the costs, Columbia Public Schools wants to regionalize where the foods are prepared. Cooking would be concentrated in only a few schools, then the food would be distributed to the rest of the schools, she said.

Consolidating the cooking sites would also cut back on waste and increase efficiency, Fullum said.

Fullum said she thinks the students' reaction to the potential change in foods is a "mixed bag."

With some students' already eating more healthily at home, Fullum said teachers' acting as role models would be "a huge part in marketing this to children."

She said the school system tries to reach out in several ways as well to encourage students to eat healthier.

"Our cafeterias are littered with nutrition information," Fullum said.

She said the schools also offer nutrition education classes and some have a fresh fruit and vegetable program that provides students with a healthy snack during the day.

"I think that our community is so ready to make these changes," she said, "because we have a very proactive and interactive community."

Like what you see here? Become a member.

Show Me the Errors (What's this?)

Report corrections or additions here. Leave comments below here.

You must be logged in to participate in the Show Me the Errors contest.


Michael Williams January 14, 2011 | 9:04 p.m.

Those lunch calorie values for the 9-12 age group seem quite small. Especially for those who are very, very active....e.g. athletes, those staying for after-school activities, etc.

(Report Comment)
Maria Oropallo January 14, 2011 | 10:36 p.m.

Michael, I agree. The supposition is that all kids need to have calories restricted. Not true for many active elementary and middle school kids. Shouldn't the emphasis be on less processed foods?

(Report Comment)
qqwweerr qqwweerr January 15, 2011 | 7:02 a.m.
This comment has been removed.
Michael Williams January 15, 2011 | 9:23 a.m.

Maria: I agree. I learned long ago as a parent (and now a grandparent) that kids will eat when they need to, and they will eat just enough calories to meet their activity and growth needs...if they are active. The problem for many kids is their exercise-effort is inconsistent with their caloric intake, so they get fat. Kick 'em outside!

I believe schools should provide an abundance of foods that are healthy (I don't even have a problem with processed ones...if they are good foods), then let the kids sort it out. Heck, I even support "seconds" for those that feel they need it.

I also support "closed campuses" so the grown-up rugrats won't sneak out for fries at the local hamburger joint! I placed my kids in someone elses' custody so they could be taught. I expect schools to keep them there until the day's teaching is done, then send them home to me. Does it do us any good at all to say "Kids should have the freedom to go off-campus and do/eat what they want", and then bemoan them eating junk and getting?????

I just shake my head at such logic.

(Report Comment)

Leave a comment

Speak up and join the conversation! Make sure to follow the guidelines outlined below and register with our site. You must be logged in to comment. (Our full comment policy is here.)

  • Don't use obscene, profane or vulgar language.
  • Don't use language that makes personal attacks on fellow commenters or discriminates based on race, religion, gender or ethnicity.
  • Use your real first and last name when registering on the website. It will be published with every comment. (Read why we ask for that here.)
  • Don’t solicit or promote businesses.

We are not able to monitor every comment that comes through. If you see something objectionable, please click the "Report comment" link.

You must be logged in to comment.

Forget your password?

Don't have an account? Register here.